Installing the Dansguardian package in PFSense - One user's experience
-
Can you check if there is any errors on console/system logs?
How old is your dansguardian install?
-
I didn't really see any errors on the logs or console…. i think it's probably about a year old installation at best. I have upgraded it whenever the upgrade was available from the main repository. I think dg is actually installing, but i'm not seeing any portions of it available for configuration in the GUI.
-
but i'm not seeing any portions of it available for configuration in the GUI.
If you can't see it on pfsense menu, try to remove/install the package again.
-
hi Marcello,
I've done that probably 5 times and still not showing up…it just stops at that one point and nothing happens, even if i let it sit there for an hour it never finishes apparently.i'm tempted to blow it away tonight and reinstall pfsense2 and restore backup and try again... hate to do that if i don't have to though.
doesn't appear that it's fully installing when i run the package, it goes through some of the motions but never registers the service as available and the GUI components never show up.
-
I'm have no idea what's going on with your install, I've tested here and could uninstall/install dansguardian without errors.
I'm going to test it on other machines too.
-
ok, well, i guess i have no other choice but to fully wipe the pfsense install and start over… luckily, i don't have a very involved configuration so it shouldn't take too long, just have to deal with a wife who will not be happy for me blocking her facebook time. lol
-
Nice write up.. i have installed Dansguardian and configured it as you said. but after finishing 1st step, when i test it I cannot browse anything at all, no good site, no bad site, no pfsense either. any idea what i am doing wrong.
OK.. managed to setup DG successfully. Now, how do i check the reports based on AD username??
-
OK.. managed to setup DG successfully. Now, how do i check the reports based on AD username??
with a tail -f on /var/log/dansguardian/access.log or with sarg package. :)
-
Hi all
Marcello thx for the DG packages, using this topic i have it running almost perfekt.
The problems that i have are that sarg its showing only the logs for 2 days (13 and 21 August) and only with the ip adress from my pfsense install.
In "realtime" i have the hosts names visible. With lightsquid i have couple days more, but same only with pfsense ip adress. Squid is running transparent.The second problem is: i have 2 samsung TVs and i stream internet radio with this (vtuner App). I placed the 2 TV IPs in Exception and now one its working, the second cannot connect to the stream servers. In the log file its showing "miss" and not "denied".
Thx
Viko -
Marcello thx for the DG packages, using this topic i have it running almost perfekt.
Thanks. donations are always welcome too ;D
The problems that i have are that sarg its showing only the logs for 2 days (13 and 21 August) and only with the ip adress from my pfsense install.
In "realtime" i have the hosts names visible. With lightsquid i have couple days more, but same only with pfsense ip adress. Squid is running transparent.are you using two squid?
squid(transparente) -> dansguardian -> squid?
did you tried dansguardian(transparent with nat rules) -> squid.
did you tried to run sarg on console to see what errors you get?
The second problem is: i have 2 samsung TVs and i stream internet radio with this (vtuner App). I placed the 2 TV IPs in Exception and now one its working, the second cannot connect to the stream servers. In the log file its showing "miss" and not "denied".
the miss on logs means "access allowed but not in cache".
-
Hi Marcello
Donation its already done. Thx for your help.
I have Squid (Transparent) - Dansguardian - NAT Rule. After a reboot everything is OK now.
Viko
-
-
Thank a lot guys! this is what i am looking for!
-
Hello,
Good day! Just a quick questions you gents, I'm currently running pfsense:
2.0.1-RELEASE (amd64)
built on Mon Dec 12 18:16:13 EST 2011
FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p6and I have created a separate computer/box/server that handles Dansguardian+Squid. On my pfsense firewall, I have installed the squid package (2.7.9 pkg v.4.3.2) then I enable transparent proxy option on that one, and added this line on the custom configuration part:
cache_peer 192.168.127.222 parent 3128 0 no-query no-digest
then I added the squid/dansguardian ip to the bypass proxy originating from this ip line. I have also used "null" for the hardisk cache system so that i won't be caching the same thing twice. Everything is working with this setup so far, the only problem I am having is that on the dansguardian/squid box, that is logged is the ip of the pfsense box and not the ips of the computers used by our users. I do understand why this is so, but I can't seem to figure out how to have the original ips passed to the squid/dansguardian box… any ideas? Thanks!
-
I do understand why this is so, but I can't seem to figure out how to have the original ips passed to the squid/dansguardian box… any ideas? Thanks!
It will always log server ip as it is proxing connections.
To have real ip on you box, you need a rule o lan using dansguardian box ip address as gateway to forward requests to it.
-
Thanks for the quick response marcelloc! as always!
The only purpose why I need to have the original IP on the dansguardian/squid box is so I can do filter groups based on the ip addresses of user's computers.
With regards to your suggestion on making my dansguardian/squid box as the gateway then route web traffic through there, can you explain a bit further? (ive attached a sample rule for it.. at least that's how interpret it.
http://tinypic.com/r/iqa4hl/6
http://tinypic.com/r/efqqkw/6You also mentioned on a previous post as reply to viko saying,
"did you tried dansguardian(transparent with nat rules) -> squid."
I'm thinking that this might be a better solution than what I currently have in mind to do. So on the pfsense box, I can install the dansguardian package and then do all the ACL and filter groups on the firewall itself then just make an external squid box that will serve as parent for the dansguardian package in the firewall. If this is possible, I wanted to ask what do you mean "transparent with nat rules"… Can you kindly give me an example? Thanks!
-
dansguardian on pfsense filtering and using a remote squid for cache is a good option for you.
The forward process to proxy server using rules is described in this post
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,54717.0.html
-
this is brilliant marcelloc!
I'll try this out later and will give you some feedback.
-
I could not reproduce this issue but I'll include on dansguardian gui an option to force squid startup before dansguardian.
First, Thanks Marcelloc for your great work.
I am having the same issue where Dansguardian is starting before squid and locking me out of the Web Interface. I installed it just yesterday and couldn't find where the option to force squid to startup before dansguardian was. Is this implemented? If so, where do I set this?Thanks!
-
I could not reproduce this issue but I'll include on dansguardian gui an option to force squid startup before dansguardian.
First, Thanks Marcelloc for your great work.
I am having the same issue where Dansguardian is starting before squid and locking me out of the Web Interface. I installed it just yesterday and couldn't find where the option to force squid to startup before dansguardian was. Is this implemented? If so, where do I set this?Thanks!
First - create a firewall rule (or add an exception to your redirect rule) so that you can get to the pfSense UI even if DG does not start…
As far as the order of starting, I'm not sure. I haven't seen that error in quite a while and I never figured out what was controlling the order (ideas Marcello?). One way to work around it is to create your own startup script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d to startup DG last. Name it something like zz_startdg.sh just to make sure it executes last.
