Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Extremely strange network issue with virtualised pfsense

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Virtualization
    19 Posts 5 Posters 9.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • johnpozJ
      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
      last edited by

      Been running my pfsense on 5.1 since the day it released and not issue one.. So what are these issues your going on about?

      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        Supermule Banned
        last edited by

        http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=2032803

        Cant find the rest right now…

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          Mike-Bracknell
          last edited by

          Well, whichever it is i'll be doing it in a week or so's time.  I've just built an identical pfsense Microserver here in the office so that we can try it out for a week, then at least I know there's likely to be a solution for my customer (despite me needing to migrate VMs across whilst I upgrade the server).

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            Supermule Banned
            last edited by

            Are you using E1000 NIC's in both boxes?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
              last edited by

              "Enhanced VMXNET adapter cannot obtain a DHCP IP address with FreeBSD 8.2"

              Ok not using vmxnet, nor are we using 8.2 of freebsd ;)

              So that would explain why this has been non issue for me..  And would never have used the vmxnet2 in the first place, article states it works with vmxnet3.  But using e1000, there was a benchmark done a few threads back and they sure didn't notice any real performance increase with them, and I had some issues with access ipsec vpn on the outside of the pfsense box from clients inside when using them.  Went back to e1000 and no issues.

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P
                podilarius
                last edited by

                I have used pfsense on a dell r710 before and it worked … I was not firewalling though ... just a soft router. I also have 128GB of memory and 4 CPUs, so I was not hurting for resources. Even though I had upwards of 30 VMs running at one time. props to pfsense.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  biggsy
                  last edited by

                  @Mike-Bracknell:

                  Well, whichever it is i'll be doing it in a week or so's time.

                  Please post again and let us know how it goes.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M
                    Mike-Bracknell
                    last edited by

                    @Supermule:

                    Are you using E1000 NIC's in both boxes?

                    Yes, I have no need to go to VMXNET-based NICs, and one nagging doubt I had was that there may have been E1000-based code in FreeBSD which didn't translate well to the Broadcom NIC, but I must say it was incredibly weird to find that other VMs on the server were affected by the pfsense VM.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      Mike-Bracknell
                      last edited by

                      @biggsy:

                      @Mike-Bracknell:

                      Well, whichever it is i'll be doing it in a week or so's time.

                      Please post again and let us know how it goes.

                      Will do.  However, so far so good with the Microserver running a 32bit VM of a 32bit OS, and i'm sure my web developers will test pfsense a hell of a lot more than a training company do :)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        Mike-Bracknell
                        last edited by

                        Just to close off on this, I have rebuilt the 32-bit PFSense in a 32-bit VM container, and it's been stable for a week now.  I think that must have been the issue.  Glad to have spotted that or it would have driven me round the bend!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.