Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Bandwidth test= fine, browsing unusable (HYPER-V)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Virtualization
    57 Posts 3 Posters 17.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K
      kejianshi
      last edited by

      This is the one I was waiting for. 
      Question.  Was this modem you are using now, it was connected to the physical machines before?
      But your links in the main status page show correctly as up correct?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        kejianshi
        last edited by

        What are you DNS servers?
        Are they being served by numbers forwarded from your WAN connection?
        Could you try changing them to something like:
        127.0.0.1
        8.8.8.8
        8.8.4.4

        ?????

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          stlnstln
          last edited by

          to note: in the second image under gateway, it says dynamic for one. This is the one I've disconnected for the virtual pfsense to use, so it is seen as down for the moment (I've removed the connection to VLAN 5 from the physical pfsense and applied it to the virtual to use).

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            stlnstln
            last edited by

            http://imgur.com/GaydetJ,BRkUTaK is a simplified network diagram

            the first image is the functional view while the second image is the physical view

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              stlnstln
              last edited by

              @kejianshi:

              What are you DNS servers?
              Are they being served by numbers forwarded from your WAN connection?
              Could you try changing them to something like:
              127.0.0.1
              8.8.8.8
              8.8.4.4

              ?????

              I use an internal DNS on the Domain Controller for internal name resolution. It forwards to the ISP's primary and secondary DNS as well as 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                stlnstln
                last edited by

                One second, trying out your suggestion

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  stlnstln
                  last edited by

                  I like your suggestion because the internal DNS hadn't changed the gateway.

                  I tried external DNS both 8.8.8.8/8.8.4.4 as well as my ISP's DNS servers and it was still slow (flushed DNS before the test as well as cleared the browser caches)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • K
                    kejianshi
                    last edited by

                    OK - Now….  Maybe its the return path thats a problem.

                    Try unplugging WAN cable from one modem.
                    Test.

                    Then other modem...
                    Test...

                    Is it more reliable on one modem than two?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • K
                      kejianshi
                      last edited by

                      Crap.  You only have one. Right?

                      OK.  Can you drop 1 IP for WAN and test?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        stlnstln
                        last edited by

                        Just dropped everything on Modem1 except for a single connection/IP to virtualize pfSense and it still has same issues

                        Weird things though…...google loads quickly and has no issues, so does speedtest.net......youtube takes a while to load all the thumbs but the videos buffer at full speed

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S
                          stlnstln
                          last edited by

                          I can't load a single thing on forum.pfsense.org when I change to the virtualized pfsense

                          Also I am seeing a ton of denials on the pfsense firewall from internal IPV6 addresses (probably broadcasts) even though I disabled IPv6….......how do I kill that off?

                          Edit: Here are the firewall logs:  http://imgur.com/1cgaMr5

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • K
                            kejianshi
                            last edited by

                            Unless you have some need of IPV6 today, why not:

                            System > Advanced > networking

                            Un-click all the IPV6 on both your PFsense boxes?

                            Turn it all off.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              stlnstln
                              last edited by

                              Yeah I did just that. The logs are still getting filled with IPv6 denials…...weird.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • K
                                kejianshi
                                last edited by

                                Can you also remove the "allow" IPV6 reference in your LANs (and maybe WANS) firewall rules?
                                Unless you need it for something?  Everywhere…

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • S
                                  stlnstln
                                  last edited by

                                  @kejianshi:

                                  Can you also remove the "allow" IPV6 reference in your LANs (and maybe WANS) firewall rules?
                                  Unless you need it for something?  Everywhere…

                                  hmmm I don't think this is the problem, though….....I should get some sleep on this.

                                  Let me know if you think of anything else that I may have missed.

                                  Edit: I have removed the references from everywhere, still showing.......hmm

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • K
                                    kejianshi
                                    last edited by

                                    OHHHHHH YES.
                                    I'm sure I'll just imagine the fix while you are sleeping!  haha  Not.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • S
                                      stlnstln
                                      last edited by

                                      @kejianshi:

                                      OHHHHHH YES.
                                      I'm sure I'll just imagine the fix while you are sleeping!  haha  Not.

                                      haha well you know what I mean…...if you think of another idea, let me know!

                                      It seems to be only a few domains that work very well, others don't. It may be a DNS issue. I'll mess around with that tomorrow

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • K
                                        kejianshi
                                        last edited by

                                        I suspect DNS issue, or WAN load balancing issue, or either DHCP, IP or MAC conflict.
                                        Be cause it works a little in fits and starts…

                                        If it were insurmountable, it wouldn't work at all.

                                        I'd start with 1 IP, 1 pfsense and 1 computer on 1 LAN and see if that even works on a fresh install.
                                        Then I'd start adding aspects of your network introducing them 1 at a time and see when it breaks.  Might point to the why.

                                        and

                                        546/547 is DHCPv6. It would go away if you enabled DHCPv6 Relay on the interface. Why is it blocked by default with the black magic in behind otherwise - no idea. For ICMP - this is all the local traffic. Allow ICMPv6 in floating rules, useless log noise gone. ICMPv6 is required for proper IPv6 working anyway.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • K
                                          kejianshi
                                          last edited by

                                          According to Mr. doktornotor, IPV6 is sort of a busted POS in freeBSD currently  (Not his words, but I get that feeling)

                                          Its suggest to:

                                          Try - where you have the IPv6 "catchall" allow rule enabled, edit -> Advanced Options - tick the checkbox with the above nondescriptive description (This allows packets with IP options to pass. Otherwise they are blocked by default. This is usually only seen with multicast traffic.) - Save - Apply. See if it helps.

                                          If you are using IPV6.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • D
                                            doktornotor Banned
                                            last edited by

                                            @kejianshi:

                                            According to Mr. doktornotor, IPV6 is sort of a busted POS in freeBSD currently  (Not his words, but I get that feeling)

                                            Well, nah… it works pretty well except for some exceptions...  ;D The fragmented packets certainly being incredibly annoying when you hit the issue.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.