Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    New OpenVPN setup for road-warriors - connected but no routing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved OpenVPN
    55 Posts 8 Posters 20.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      Cylindric
      last edited by

      Doesn't appear to be, I only installed it a few days ago too - I'm on 1.0.11

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        kejianshi
        last edited by

        If its not offering an update there, you version is current.  We are on the same thing.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          kejianshi
          last edited by

          Sorry to nit-pick but just checking.  When you stipulate your tunnel IP make sure that subnet isn't used on the client side or the server side.  Give the openvpn tunnel a seperate range.

          So if client is on a 192.168.1.0/24    and server is on a 178.x.x.x    make the tunnlel network something like 10.122.20.0/24  (or whatever)

          No need to push routes or any other madness.

          I do provide DNS servers and NTP servers though.  Get two online for NTP servers in your timezone and use 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 if you want google DNS

          I also provide a default domain NAME.  Just pick a name like tunnel1194 if you only use one server.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            Cylindric
            last edited by

            Still no joy, even with both server and client set to "TUN". With or without the Management part. With 2.2 or 2.3-x86.

            Tue Jul 30 16:07:21 2013 OpenVPN 2.3.2 i686-w64-mingw32 [SSL (OpenSSL)] [LZO] [PKCS11] [eurephia] [IPv6] built on Jun  3 2013
            Enter Management Password:
            Tue Jul 30 16:07:27 2013 Control Channel Authentication: using 'firewall-udp-1194-mark-tls.key' as a OpenVPN static key file
            Tue Jul 30 16:07:27 2013 UDPv4 link local (bound): [undef]
            Tue Jul 30 16:07:27 2013 UDPv4 link remote: [AF_INET]88.215.3.70:1194
            Tue Jul 30 16:07:27 2013 WARNING: this configuration may cache passwords in memory – use the auth-nocache option to prevent this
            Tue Jul 30 16:07:29 2013 [MyVPN_Server] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]88.215.3.70:1194
            Tue Jul 30 16:07:31 2013 do_ifconfig, tt->ipv6=0, tt->did_ifconfig_ipv6_setup=0
            Tue Jul 30 16:07:31 2013 open_tun, tt->ipv6=0
            Tue Jul 30 16:07:31 2013 TAP-WIN32 device [Local Area Connection] opened: \\.\Global\{27851D99-6A01-467F-965E-44884FAA8B29}.tap
            Tue Jul 30 16:07:31 2013 Notified TAP-Windows driver to set a DHCP IP/netmask of 172.29.0.6/255.255.255.252 on interface {27851D99-6A01-467F-965E-44884FAA8B29} [DHCP-serv: 172.29.0.5, lease-time: 31536000]
            Tue Jul 30 16:07:31 2013 Successful ARP Flush on interface [22] {27851D99-6A01-467F-965E-44884FAA8B29}
            Tue Jul 30 16:07:36 2013 Initialization Sequence Completed
            
            

            ipconfig.txt
            route.txt

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              kejianshi
              last edited by

              All firewalls off on the windows box?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                doktornotor Banned
                last edited by

                @Cylindric:

                Still no joy, even with both server and client set to "TUN". With or without the Management part. With 2.2 or 2.3-x86.

                I don't understand what are you trying to do there.

                
                   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : TAP-Windows Adapter V9 #2
                   IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 172.29.0.6(Preferred) 
                   Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.252
                
                

                This for sure again looks like /30.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  Cylindric
                  last edited by

                  @kejianshi:

                  Sorry to nit-pick but just checking.  When you stipulate your tunnel IP make sure that subnet isn't used on the client side or the server side.  Give the openvpn tunnel a seperate range.

                  So if client is on a 192.168.1.0/24    and server is on a 178.x.x.x     make the tunnlel network something like 10.122.20.0/24  (or whatever)

                  No need to push routes or any other madness.

                  I do provide DNS servers and NTP servers though.  Get two online for NTP servers in your timezone and use 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 if you want google DNS

                  I also provide a default domain NAME.  Just pick a name like tunnel1194 if you only use one server.

                  Nitpick away - whatever it takes :)

                  My remote test PC is on a 172.29.14.0 subnet with a mask 255.255.255.0, at the moment the IP is 172.29.14.100

                  My pfSense LAN subnet is 10.10.0.0 with mask 255.255.255.0, and the IP is 10.10.0.3

                  The server "Tunnel Network" is 172.29.0.0/24
                  The sever "Local Network" is 10.10.0.0/24

                  The client "Tunnel Network" is 172.29.0.0/24
                  The client "Local Network" is 10.10.0.0/24

                  The firewall is now disabled on the PC. Not sure what the Virgin SuperHub might be doing though - although as the tunnel is established and I can see that in the pfSense status, I assume any intermediary firewalls just see "traffic", not anything specific.

                  This for sure again looks like /30

                  I can only assume this is coming from the config in pfSense, I'm not setting that mask anywhere. I have /24 in all configs.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    doktornotor Banned
                    last edited by

                    @Cylindric:

                    This for sure again looks like /30

                    I can only assume this is coming from the config in pfSense, I'm not setting that mask anywhere. I have /24 in all configs.

                    Please, tick the proper checkbox so that this net30 topology is NOT used.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • C
                      Cylindric
                      last edited by

                      @doktornotor:

                      Please, tick the proper checkbox so that this net30 topology is NOT used.

                      What screen are you seeing that on? I just get the attached.

                      settings.png
                      settings.png_thumb

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        doktornotor Banned
                        last edited by

                        @Cylindric:

                        @doktornotor:

                        Please, tick the proper checkbox so that this net30 topology is NOT used.

                        What screen are you seeing that on? I just get the attached.

                        As already posted elsewhere. This ONLY is available if you set up the interface as TUN. Not with TAP.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • C
                          Cylindric
                          last edited by

                          @doktornotor:

                          As already posted elsewhere. This ONLY is available if you set up the interface as TUN. Not with TAP.

                          I am on TUN now.

                          ovpn-server.png
                          ovpn-server.png_thumb
                          ovpn-client.png
                          ovpn-client.png_thumb

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • D
                            doktornotor Banned
                            last edited by

                            Well, then it's not available in 2.0.3. Time to upgrade. :P

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • C
                              Cylindric
                              last edited by

                              2.0.3 is the latest I could find. You folks running the 2.1 RC?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • K
                                kejianshi
                                last edited by

                                You can go to 2.1RC

                                http://snapshots.pfsense.org/

                                But honestly, this should work fine on 2.03.  It should be a 5 minute setup from start to finish.

                                Some basic little thing is broken and its possible its not even anything to do with pfsense.

                                I'll read you config again.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • C
                                  Cylindric
                                  last edited by

                                  Thanks. Tomorrow I'll probably delete all the settings and start from scratch - I made some wrong turns at the start that may be lingering.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • K
                                    kejianshi
                                    last edited by

                                    OK - This is broken.  Why is it set up as peer to peer now?

                                    Server mode (I suggest Remote Access. SSL/TLS)

                                    protocol UDP

                                    device mode TUN

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • K
                                      kejianshi
                                      last edited by

                                      You don't need 2.1 to make it work…  Problem is peer to peer.  You don't want that.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • C
                                        Cylindric
                                        last edited by

                                        This is a bit odd. The server is set to "Remote Access (SSL/TLS + User Auth)", but the client is now set to Peer-to-peer, and the only options available are the two "peer to peer" ones.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • K
                                          kejianshi
                                          last edited by

                                          Recommendation - Delete the server and the client.

                                          Use the wizard and set it up again using TUN from the very beginning.

                                          It sounds big deal but should be a few minutes.

                                          I'm sure 2.1 works fine but 2.3 isn't broken either.

                                          You just got a bit twisted around.  Thats all.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • C
                                            Cylindric
                                            last edited by

                                            I'll try it again tomorrow - getting frazzled now :)

                                            Just deleted both configs, used the wizard to setup the server bit (seemed to create a tun setup anyway) but a new client still only allows server mode Peer to Peer.

                                            ovpn-client.png
                                            ovpn-client.png_thumb

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.