Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PfSense OpenVPN Server and Tomato OpenVPN Client

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved OpenVPN
    37 Posts 7 Posters 18.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • E
      elkosupertech
      last edited by

      As far as I can tell, OpenVPN's settings on the Firewall are set to allow all.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jimpJ
        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
        last edited by

        The last time I had to config Tomato as a client it had a quirk where, for whatever reason, I had to add this to the Tomato client config:

        
        keepalive 10 60
        ping-timer-rem
        

        And then it started connecting and working as expected.

        Other than that it was a fairly standard static key config, nothing too special.

        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

        Do not Chat/PM for help!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • E
          elkosupertech
          last edited by

          I have entered this on the Tomato side and still no joy.  Any other suggestions?

          DJ

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            doktornotor Banned
            last edited by

            Get in touch with Tomato guys… DD-WRT had OpenVPN buggy as hell more often than not, I doubt it's any better with Tomato.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              kejianshi
              last edited by

              When pfsense is connected to something else and its broken, I get the feeling that people don't come here because they feel its a pfsense issue.  I think they come here because no one will answer their questions in other places.  haha.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jimpJ
                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                last edited by

                OpenVPN is pretty standard, despite quirks from the router firmware involved.

                Given that things have changed from the start to now, it might help to know exactly what settings are in use on both sides as it is right now.

                Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • E
                  elkosupertech
                  last edited by

                  Here are the configs I have currently:

                  pfSense:
                  OpenVPN: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZWxrb3N1cGVydGVjaC5jb218d2Vic2l0ZXxneDo3MGM3ZWZmNGIzNGI0YzNi
                  Client Specific Override: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZWxrb3N1cGVydGVjaC5jb218d2Vic2l0ZXxneDozOGVlMjZjZDU0OGFjZWEw

                  Tomato
                  Basic: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZWxrb3N1cGVydGVjaC5jb218d2Vic2l0ZXxneDo0OGQ0N2YxNzY5M2M1NjY3
                  Advanced: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZWxrb3N1cGVydGVjaC5jb218d2Vic2l0ZXxneDo1OWRjM2M3YmVjYjI0MTU1

                  If you need more please let me know.  Thank you for all your help!

                  DJ

                  P.S. This Tomato router used to connect up with an Astaro Security appliance before they changed their licensing on it so I know that side works.  The only change I did with tomato was change the Keys for the new server.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jimpJ
                    jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                    last edited by

                    The client basic config for tomato links to the pfsense config.

                    Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                    Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                    Do not Chat/PM for help!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • E
                      elkosupertech
                      last edited by

                      I edited the links, but just in case https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZWxrb3N1cGVydGVjaC5jb218d2Vic2l0ZXxneDo0OGQ0N2YxNzY5M2M1NjY3

                      Thanks again!

                      DJ

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • jimpJ
                        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                        last edited by

                        Why do you have it on Remote Access SSL/TLS and not Peer to Peer SSL/TLS?

                        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                        Do not Chat/PM for help!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • jimpJ
                          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                          last edited by

                          I would move it to Peer-to-Peer SSL/TLS, kill the user auth.

                          Other than the user+pass auth, I don't see anything odd about it from the settings.

                          We'd need to see the OpenVPN logs from both sides to say much more.

                          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                          Do not Chat/PM for help!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • E
                            elkosupertech
                            last edited by

                            Well according to the instructions I used (very first post) that was the recommended way.  I am open to changing any of the settings I have.  Also I have stated that I can get it to work (one way) by turning on NAT on the Tomato side so that network then communicates though that way.

                            DJ

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • E
                              elkosupertech
                              last edited by

                              Change made.  And still same issue.  Here are the logs from Tomato:

                              Aug  2 10:40:34 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: PUSH: Received control message: 'PUSH_REPLY,route 10.1.0.0 255.255.255.0,route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0,route 10.2.0.0 255.255.255.0,route 172.18.0.1,topology net30,ping 10,ping-restart 60,ifconfig 172.18.0.6 172.18.0.5'
                              Aug  2 10:40:34 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: OPTIONS IMPORT: timers and/or timeouts modified
                              Aug  2 10:40:34 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: OPTIONS IMPORT: –ifconfig/up options modified
                              Aug  2 10:40:34 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: OPTIONS IMPORT: route options modified
                              Aug  2 10:40:34 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: TUN/TAP device tun11 opened
                              Aug  2 10:40:34 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: TUN/TAP TX queue length set to 100
                              Aug  2 10:40:34 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: /sbin/ifconfig tun11 172.18.0.6 pointopoint 172.18.0.5 mtu 1500
                              Aug  2 10:40:34 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: /sbin/route add -net 10.1.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 172.18.0.5
                              Aug  2 10:40:34 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: /sbin/route add -net 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 172.18.0.5
                              Aug  2 10:40:34 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: /sbin/route add -net 10.2.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 172.18.0.5
                              Aug  2 10:40:34 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: /sbin/route add -net 172.18.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 gw 172.18.0.5
                              Aug  2 10:40:34 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: Initialization Sequence Completed
                              Aug  2 10:40:38 unknown daemon.err openvpn[10117]: event_wait : Interrupted system call (code=4)
                              Aug  2 10:40:38 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: OpenVPN STATISTICS
                              Aug  2 10:40:38 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: Updated,Fri Aug  2 10:40:38 2013
                              Aug  2 10:40:38 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: TUN/TAP read bytes,0
                              Aug  2 10:40:38 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: TUN/TAP write bytes,0
                              Aug  2 10:40:38 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: TCP/UDP read bytes,6521
                              Aug  2 10:40:38 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: TCP/UDP write bytes,4852
                              Aug  2 10:40:38 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: Auth read bytes,0
                              Aug  2 10:40:38 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: END
                              Aug  2 10:40:42 unknown daemon.err openvpn[10117]: event_wait : Interrupted system call (code=4)
                              Aug  2 10:40:42 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: OpenVPN STATISTICS
                              Aug  2 10:40:42 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: Updated,Fri Aug  2 10:40:42 2013
                              Aug  2 10:40:42 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: TUN/TAP read bytes,0
                              Aug  2 10:40:42 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: TUN/TAP write bytes,0
                              Aug  2 10:40:42 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: TCP/UDP read bytes,6521
                              Aug  2 10:40:42 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: TCP/UDP write bytes,4852
                              Aug  2 10:40:42 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: Auth read bytes,0
                              Aug  2 10:40:42 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: END
                              Aug  2 10:40:59 unknown daemon.err openvpn[10117]: event_wait : Interrupted system call (code=4)
                              Aug  2 10:40:59 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: OpenVPN STATISTICS
                              Aug  2 10:40:59 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: Updated,Fri Aug  2 10:40:59 2013
                              Aug  2 10:40:59 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: TUN/TAP read bytes,3060
                              Aug  2 10:40:59 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: TUN/TAP write bytes,0
                              Aug  2 10:40:59 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: TCP/UDP read bytes,6659
                              Aug  2 10:40:59 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: TCP/UDP write bytes,8205
                              Aug  2 10:40:59 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: Auth read bytes,32
                              Aug  2 10:40:59 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: END
                              Aug  2 10:41:01 unknown user.info init[1]: VPN_LOG_NOTE: 73: VPN Client 1 already running…
                              Aug  2 10:41:50 unknown daemon.err openvpn[10117]: event_wait : Interrupted system call (code=4)
                              Aug  2 10:41:50 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: OpenVPN STATISTICS
                              Aug  2 10:41:50 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: Updated,Fri Aug  2 10:41:50 2013
                              Aug  2 10:41:50 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: TUN/TAP read bytes,6883
                              Aug  2 10:41:50 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: TUN/TAP write bytes,0
                              Aug  2 10:41:50 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: TCP/UDP read bytes,7004
                              Aug  2 10:41:50 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: TCP/UDP write bytes,12925
                              Aug  2 10:41:50 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: Auth read bytes,112
                              Aug  2 10:41:50 unknown daemon.notice openvpn[10117]: END
                              Aug  2 10:42:01 unknown user.info init[1]: VPN_LOG_NOTE: 73: VPN Client 1 already running…

                              and from pfSense:
                              Aug 2 10:38:28 openvpn[567]: event_wait : Interrupted system call (code=4)
                              Aug 2 10:38:29 openvpn[567]: /usr/local/sbin/ovpn-linkdown ovpns1 1500 1557 172.18.0.1 172.18.0.2 init
                              Aug 2 10:38:29 openvpn[567]: SIGTERM[hard,] received, process exiting
                              Aug 2 10:38:29 openvpn[26832]: OpenVPN 2.2.2 amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1 [SSL] [LZO2] [eurephia] built on Apr 2 2013
                              Aug 2 10:38:29 openvpn[26832]: NOTE: the current –script-security setting may allow this configuration to call user-defined scripts
                              Aug 2 10:38:29 openvpn[26832]: TUN/TAP device /dev/tun1 opened
                              Aug 2 10:38:29 openvpn[26832]: /sbin/ifconfig ovpns1 172.18.0.1 172.18.0.2 mtu 1500 netmask 255.255.255.255 up
                              Aug 2 10:38:29 openvpn[26832]: /usr/local/sbin/ovpn-linkup ovpns1 1500 1557 172.18.0.1 172.18.0.2 init
                              Aug 2 10:38:29 openvpn[28114]: UDPv4 link local (bound): 204.28.248.153:1195
                              Aug 2 10:38:29 openvpn[28114]: UDPv4 link remote: [undef]
                              Aug 2 10:38:29 openvpn[28114]: Initialization Sequence Completed
                              Aug 2 10:38:29 openvpn[28114]: IPv6 in tun mode is not supported in OpenVPN 2.2
                              Aug 2 10:39:23 openvpn[28114]: 74.34.62.30:48938 Re-using SSL/TLS context
                              Aug 2 10:39:26 openvpn[28114]: 74.34.62.30:48938 [VPN_Parents] Peer Connection Initiated with 74.34.62.30:48938
                              Aug 2 10:40:05 openvpn[28114]: 74.34.62.30:64452 Re-using SSL/TLS context
                              Aug 2 10:40:07 openvpn[28114]: 74.34.62.30:64452 [VPN_Parents] Peer Connection Initiated with 74.34.62.30:64452
                              Aug 2 10:40:28 openvpn[28114]: 74.34.62.30:41811 Re-using SSL/TLS context
                              Aug 2 10:40:31 openvpn[28114]: 74.34.62.30:41811 [VPN_Parents] Peer Connection Initiated with 74.34.62.30:41811

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • E
                                elkosupertech
                                last edited by

                                Was that all the logs needed?  Please let me know.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • E
                                  elkosupertech
                                  last edited by

                                  I've been trying to figure a solution to my problem and it seems to me that it thinks the gateway is on 172.18.0.5 but it sees the tomato client on 172.18.0.6.  Even stranger is that it's routing table shows to access the network behind tomato, to go to 172.18.0.2.  Is there a reason that pf Sense is so confused?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • jimpJ
                                    jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                    last edited by

                                    That is not pfSense, it's OpenVPN. And that is normal.

                                    For example, here is one site-to-site tunnel I have using SSL/TLS setup for multiple clients (some bits snipped):

                                    ovpns1: flags=8051 <up,pointopoint,running,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                            inet 192.168.239.1 --> 192.168.239.2 netmask 0xffffffff 
                                    ...
                                    192.168.a.0/24    192.168.239.2      UGS         0   685847 ovpns1
                                    192.168.b.0/24    192.168.239.2      UGS         0        0 ovpns1
                                    192.168.239.0/24   192.168.239.2      UGS         0        0 ovpns1
                                    192.168.239.2      link#10            UH          0        0 ovpns1</up,pointopoint,running,multicast>
                                    

                                    And on the client side:

                                    ovpnc1: flags=8051 <up,pointopoint,running,multicast>metric 0 mtu 1500
                                            inet 192.168.239.6 --> 192.168.239.5 netmask 0xffffffff 
                                    ...
                                    192.168.z.0/24   192.168.239.5      UGS         0        0 ovpnc1
                                    192.168.y.0/24   192.168.239.5      UGS         0    14557 ovpnc1
                                    192.168.x.0/24   192.168.239.5      UGS         0        0 ovpnc1
                                    192.168.239.0/24   192.168.239.5      UGS         0        0 ovpnc1
                                    192.168.239.5      link#13            UH          0        0 ovpnc1</up,pointopoint,running,multicast>
                                    

                                    OpenVPN assigns addresses that way. Some exposed to the OS on the server side, others internal to OpenVPN on the server side. That is all completely normal for an SSL/TLS multi-site setup. The iroutes in OpenVPN client-specific overrides tell it which subnets are reachable via specific certificates.

                                    Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                    Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                    Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • E
                                      elkosupertech
                                      last edited by

                                      Thank you for clarifying this.  I was hoping that any bit of information, even if it was just an observation would come up with a solution.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • P
                                        PGalati
                                        last edited by

                                        Did this scenario ever get resolved?  I understand that both firmware versions (pfsense and Tomato) have been updated since this post was created.

                                        I am having a very similar problem as the OP did or does.  I can ping anything from the client side. I can ping the client's router from the server side, but I cannot ping anything on the clients network.  In my scenario, I am attempting to use a Cisco 7961 VOIP phone connected to Tomato over an openVPN tunnel to pfsense that is networked with a Cisco Call Manager pbx.  The phone on the client side does connect to the phone system, and if I call someone, they can hear me, but I cannot hear them.

                                        I would really like to get this resolved so a proper how-to can be written for others.  I have seen lots of posts of similar scenarios with this combination of hardware, but have not found a definite answer to fix this.

                                        Thanks.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • P
                                          PGalati
                                          last edited by

                                          I was able to solve this scenario and soon hope to create a how-to to help others that specifically use pfsense and Tomato.  This link pushed me in the right direction:

                                          https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Why_won't_OpenVPN_push_routes

                                          Click on this link to get some additional info about the correct way to configure the openvpn server on pfsense:

                                          https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/OpenVPN_Site-to-Site_PKI_%28SSL%29

                                          To the point, once I changed the pfsense openvpn server mode from Remote Access (SSL+User Auth) to Peer to Peer (SSL/TLS), made the appropriate adjustments on the Tomato side, I started getting ping responses from clients from the server side.  Our Cisco voip phones work both ways now too.

                                          Finally!

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Y
                                            yodaphone
                                            last edited by

                                            @PGalati:

                                            I was able to solve this scenario and soon hope to create a how-to to help others that specifically use pfsense and Tomato.  This link pushed me in the right direction:

                                            https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Why_won't_OpenVPN_push_routes

                                            Click on this link to get some additional info about the correct way to configure the openvpn server on pfsense:

                                            https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/OpenVPN_Site-to-Site_PKI_%28SSL%29

                                            To the point, once I changed the pfsense openvpn server mode from Remote Access (SSL+User Auth) to Peer to Peer (SSL/TLS), made the appropriate adjustments on the Tomato side, I started getting ping responses from clients from the server side.  Our Cisco voip phones work both ways now too.

                                            Finally!

                                            Hi , i'm trying to do the same thing. can you please tell me what your tomato side config is?

                                            have you enabled TLS Authentication?
                                            did you enable Extra HMAC authorization (tls-auth)?

                                            i'm getting TLS Error: incoming packet authentication failed from [AF_INET]

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.