Forum upgraded to SMF 2.x
-
Nice.
I agree the font size seems a bit big but I'm sure I'll get used to it. I just have to retrain my muscle memory to click 'unread replies' top right instead of top left. ::)Steve
That's exactly what I thought first, too! ;)
-
One further thing I've noticed is that there is no immediate visual difference between posts I've read and those that I haven't. In the SMF 1.X threads with new posts were shown as bold until I read them. This makes it very easy to overlook any new questions.
Steve
-
Functionally, the only thing I've noticed so far is that I can't tell who is lurking on a thread, and the larger font etc. There might be something happening under the hood that makes life easier for the admins. Not sure. It works. I like simple not too jazzed up things. Suits me.
-
One further thing I've noticed is that there is no immediate visual difference between posts I've read and those that I haven't. In the SMF 1.X threads with new posts were shown as bold until I read them. This makes it very easy to overlook any new questions.
Unread threads have an orange "New" icon, though the bold title was better.
-
Can you please change the CSS to make the font in (quick)reply textarea smaller? It's really annoying. Should be the quickReplyContent and editor classes.
-
Can you please change the CSS to make the font in (quick)reply textarea smaller? It's really annoying. Should be the quickReplyContent and editor classes.
Should be fixed now
-
One further thing I've noticed is that there is no immediate visual difference between posts I've read and those that I haven't. In the SMF 1.X threads with new posts were shown as bold until I read them. This makes it very easy to overlook any new questions.
Unread threads have an orange "New" icon, though the bold title was better.
The new threads as bold should be working again (hopefully without any side effects :-)
-
-
Functionally, the only thing I've noticed so far is that I can't tell who is lurking on a thread[…]
This should be back now, too.
-
Also, if possible, more contrasted between background and topic table. Maybe border ?
-
Also, if possible, more contrasted between background and topic table. Maybe border ?
Not sure I follow on that one. Where exactly? Can you post a screenshot with the area highlighted?
Anywhere I can see that lists topics is already fairly well contrasted (white or very light grey background with dark red text)
-
Love it! Thank you guys!
-
Also, if possible, more contrasted between background and topic table. Maybe border ?
Not sure I follow on that one. Where exactly? Can you post a screenshot with the area highlighted?
Anywhere I can see that lists topics is already fairly well contrasted (white or very light grey background with dark red text)
Mani page looks good. May be would like to continue like this.
-
And +
( In some cheap Acer monitors that's look as mono field with background panel )
-
I'm not seeing any contrast issues on any of those, they're all pretty well-differentiated light/dark. Which exact part of the screen are you suggesting should be modified? (circle it in the pic)
-
I'm not seeing any contrast issues on any of those, they're all pretty well-differentiated light/dark. Which exact part of the screen are you suggesting should be modified? (circle it in the pic)
It seems to me to make a few darker border as main page.
-
Sounds more like you need to replace the broken monitor or stop setting it to 150% brightness.
-
Better now?
-
Not sure if it's only me but when looking through the unread threads I always focus on the username which is in bold but not on the thread title which is not bold. Should be the way around I think.
-
Not sure if it's only me but when looking through the unread threads I always focus on the username which is in bold but not on the thread title which is not bold. Should be the way around I think.
You mean the "started by" part?
How does it look now? Just the title should be bold now.
