LAN to LAN - Problems ;)
-
Well the DD-WRT router is just a consumer-router with horrible throughput(600-800kb/s openvpn-performance) and i need at least 2mb/s.
I currently dont got the hardware to build a new pfsense-box.UPDATE:
The speed was when using openvpn on the dd-wrt-router -
So you need 2mbps, and dd-wrt does 800kbps – how is putting openvpn on a box behind dd-wrt going to fix that?
So replace the hardware running dd-wrt on now that something can handle the bandwidth you need and then run openvpn on that. Depending on the hardware - just run pfsense vs dd-wrt.
-
The box behind the DD-WRT router is a ubuntu-server.
The ubuntu-server got a 4-core-xeon cpu. I think this should handle the 2 mb/s -
Does not exactly matter what's behind the bottleneck. :D
-
The dd-wrt-router is only the bottleneck when im running the openvpn-service on it.
So whats your point? Or am i missing something?I dont want to replace the router, because i dont got the hardware
and i dont want to spend the money just for running openvpn on it. -
I still do not get why are you running OpenVPN thru an obvious bottleneck. Make an AP from it on your LAN, stop using it as router.
-
I dont get why the dd-wrt router is the bottleneck?
-
Sigh… because you said it yourself? As suggested by myself and other people above, move pfS where the DD-WRT is right now and use the DD-WRT router as an AP. Otherwise, since this obviously does not go anywhere - have a nice day.
-
CaptainWTF could walk him through this… He figured this out and its fresh in his mind (-:
-
Ok my fault. I was talking about 800kb/s throughput when running openvpn on the dd-wrt router.
I tought this was clear due to the advice in the previous post.
Thats why i want to use the ubuntu-server.
