Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Igb 2.4.0 causing crashes

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.1.1 Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
    32 Posts 9 Posters 10.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      jasonlitka
      last edited by

      @ermal:

      Start by sharing what you are doing!

      Hardware Specs (both boxes are identical):

      • Intel E3-1245 V2 CPU (3.4GHz) w/ HT disabled

      • 16GB DDR3 ECC RAM

      • Intel 530 240GB SSD

      • (12) Intel i350 1Gbe

      • (2) Intel X520 10Gbe

      Software Config:

      • iperf tests running across ix1 (have tried both SFP+ Direct Attach and Single-Mode OM3 patch with Intel SR optics directly between boxes, as well as running through a Cisco Nexus 5548UP)

      • Interface has simple any/any firewall rule

      • Snort is NOT running on these interfaces (though it is on others)

      Tweaks in /boot/loader.conf.local:

      • kern.ipc.nmbclusters="262144"

      • kern.ipc.nmbjumbop="262144"

      • hw.intr_storm_threshold=10000

      Setting MSIX on or off seems to make no difference and neither does setting the number of interface queues (have tried 1, 2, and 4).

      Tweaks in System Tunables:

      • kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=16777216

      • net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_inc=524288

      • net.inet.tcp.recvbuf_max=16777216

      • net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_inc=16384

      • net.inet.tcp.sendbuf_max=16777216

      Test Results (always +/- 2 Gbit/s, sometimes 1.8, sometimes 2.2):

      • iperf -c & -s = 2Gbit/s

      • iperf -c -d & -s = sum of both directions is 2Gbit/s (typically something like 1.8 and 0.2)

      • iperf -c -P2 & -s = sum of both threads is 2Gbit/s (typically something like 1.3 & 0.7)

      • iperf -c -P4 & -s = sum of all threads is 2Gbit/s (typically +/- 0.5 on each)

      All 4 cores have an idle percentage in the 40-50% range even when running at the -P4 test.

      I can break anything.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • E
        eri--
        last edited by

        You are sourcing traffic from the same box?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          jasonlitka
          last edited by

          I have two identical boxes.  For the purpose of testing throughput (before I route all the internal traffic from my servers through them) I have them connected directly to each other.

          I can break anything.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • E
            eri--
            last edited by

            Well your result may vary here from the tool used.
            Since there are many cores your program may bounce here and there so i do not think you can achieve stable results as that.

            What i recommend you for ix devices is

            
            hw.ixgbe.rx_process_limit=1024 #maybe higher or lower depends on testing
            hw.ixgbe.tx_process_limit=1024
            
            hw.ixgbe.num_queues=#ofcores you have
            
            hw.ixgbe.txd=4096
            hw.ixgbe.rxd=4096
            
            

            Though these are very dependant on the workload you are trying to produce.

            Also with single stream i am not sure with default parameters of iperf you can achieve 10G :).

            Also remove this as well
            hw.intr_storm_threshold=10000

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              charliem
              last edited by

              @ermal:

              Give it another shot with new snapshots.

              The panics have been resolved and let us know.

              Any pointers to what the fix actually was?  I didn't see anything in redmine, or freebsd patches.  Course I haven't jumped through the hoops followed through to get access to the tools again.  Not sure it's worth it for a non-contributor, but active tester and curious code reader.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A
                adam65535
                last edited by

                You are overthinking the fix I think.  I think the fix he is referring to is that thy reverted the drivers to the older versions.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • E
                  eri--
                  last edited by

                  Actually the drivers are the latest found in FreeBSD.

                  The fix was involved in correcting the handling of the interface in FreeBSD 8 which is a bit of a mix compared to later ones.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    jasonlitka
                    last edited by

                    @ermal:

                    Well your result may vary here from the tool used.
                    Since there are many cores your program may bounce here and there so i do not think you can achieve stable results as that.

                    What i recommend you for ix devices is

                    
                    hw.ixgbe.rx_process_limit=1024 #maybe higher or lower depends on testing
                    hw.ixgbe.tx_process_limit=1024
                    
                    hw.ixgbe.num_queues=#ofcores you have
                    
                    hw.ixgbe.txd=4096
                    hw.ixgbe.rxd=4096
                    
                    

                    Though these are very dependant on the workload you are trying to produce.

                    Also with single stream i am not sure with default parameters of iperf you can achieve 10G :).

                    Also remove this as well
                    hw.intr_storm_threshold=10000

                    Thanks, I'll give those a try tomorrow.

                    It's not so much the single stream performance I'm worried about.  It's more the fact that 2 or 4 threads produce the exact same throughput in aggregate but it doesn't appear that I'm CPU bound.

                    I can break anything.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • E
                      eri--
                      last edited by

                      Also check to disable aim(auto interrupt moderation) since that migh limit your throughput as well.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J
                        jasonlitka
                        last edited by

                        I added:

                        hw.ix.rx_process_limit=1024
                        hw.ix.tx_process_limit=1024
                        hw.ix.txd=4096
                        hw.ix.rxd=4096

                        For a single thread this made zero difference; I still see just about 2 Gbit/s.  With 4 threads it now hits somewhere between 3.3-4.0Gbit/s (very inconsistent).  Single-threaded bidirectional tests (-c -d & -s) hit about 3Gbit/s and dual-threaded bidirectional tests hit around 4Gbit/s (-c -d -P2 & -s).  For some reason trying to use 4 threads on a bidirectional test makes iperf segfault so I can't try that.

                        Reverting hw.intr_storm_threshold to the default of 1000 made no difference (I changed this in FreeNAS to get past ~2.5Gbit/s, if memory serves, assumed the same would be required here since it's mentioned in the pfSense Wiki Docs).

                        Disabling AIM with setting dev.ix.0.enable_aim & dev.ix.1.enable_aim to "0" also didn't have any impact.

                        I can break anything.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.