Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Local vs VPN DNS Name Resolution

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved OpenVPN
    26 Posts 4 Posters 7.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • N
      NOYB
      last edited by

      My binding order does not show any OpenVPN item.
      (Windows 8.1 Pro)

      ![Binding Order Win 8.1.jpg](/public/imported_attachments/1/Binding Order Win 8.1.jpg)
      ![Binding Order Win 8.1.jpg_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Binding Order Win 8.1.jpg_thumb)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
        last edited by

        Your on provider - I renamed mined, your is prob called tap, etc.  Whatever the default is.. Switch over to adapters and bindings.  What does it show?

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • N
          NOYB
          last edited by

          Ah okay I see.

          Yes in Adapters and Bindings my TAP device is named Local Area Connection.

          I'll try moving it to the top of the list and see what that does to the name resolution.

          Thanks for the pointer.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • N
            NOYB
            last edited by

            Well that's a little bit of an improvement, but not much.

            Queries for internet names (non-local and non-vpn) using nslookup all go to the VPN DNS exclusively.  This is the desired behavior.

            However, for browsing, queries still go to both the local and VPN DNS servers and responses are received from both.  The desired behavior would be for only local name queries to be sent to the local DNS server and all other name queries to be sent to the VPN DNS server.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
              last edited by

              "  The desired behavior would be for only local name queries to be sent to the local DNS server and all other name queries to be sent to the VPN DNS server."

              That is not how dns works..  You would have to run a nameserver on your local box - and create forwarder rules, so all your KNOWN local went to your local dns server, and everything else (non local and internet went to whatever other dns you wanted to send it to)

              What do you mean by browsing btw, like \somename or ping hostnameonly ?

              Browsing is not a dns thing.. queries for FQDN are what dns is for.. if your client is sending hostname to dns how do you expect it to resolve in the first place without domain to look up that the name server either forwards on, or is authoritative for..

              What response are you getting from your vpn dns, it sure and the hell would not know about your local zones?

              please give a detailed example of for starters how you know where the queries are going and what your getting back for an answer.. window client does not query all the dns servers it has listed at once.. It will query one, if it doesn't get answer it will go onto next, etc..

              What version of windows is this client?

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • N
                NOYB
                last edited by

                Using Wireshark to capture both the WiFi and VPN networks.  Filter on port 53.

                Query for nslookup yahoo.con goes to the VPN DNS only.  As desired.

                However,
                Browse (IE) to http://yahoo.com and the name queries go to both the local (192.168.1.1) and VPN (192.168.2.1) DNS servers.  And resolved addresses are received from both.

                Seems like this could be a big security hole.  Possible for a public hot spot network to send clients to malicious sites even though they are using a VPN.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                  last edited by

                  That is your browser doing that - not the OS..  Don't use IE for starters if your worried about security ;)

                  Well yeah if you query them, they will answer if they can ;)

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • N
                    NOYB
                    last edited by

                    It's not just IE that this OpenVPN DNS behavior occurs with.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpozJ
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                      last edited by

                      Its not openvpn behavior..  Openvpn has nothing to do with dns, what your os or application does with what its handed has nothing to do with openvpn.

                      I don't see this behavior, are you talking about queries for such like wpad ?

                      You see in first picture that hey I am doing dns to the dns server on my openvpn interface..

                      Look what happens if I ask for something like pfsense.local.lan - it asks my openvpn dns, he says NX.. Sorry..  there is no domain like that.. So client gives up..  Now if dns server had not answered, or returned serv fail, then sure would of keep trying to resolve via methods it knows how to use to resolve.

                      You sure your not seeing broadcasts for names – we dns your set to says fails to respond windows will get desperate and even broadcast for your fqdn even though it doesn't exist, etc.

                      Lets see a specific example of what your concerned with.

                      querydns.png
                      querydns.png_thumb
                      nxreturned.png
                      nxreturned.png_thumb

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • N
                        NOYB
                        last edited by

                        Attachment Details:

                        Wireshark capture on both the WiFi and OpenVPN interfaces with capture filter 'port 53'.

                        192.168.1.x is local WiFi hotspot network.
                        192.168.22.x is OpenVPN to pfSense (configured to force all traffic through VPN and provide DNS servers list.

                        Browse to: https://wwws.ameritrade.com/apps/LogIn/

                        DNS queries for the non-local name are sent to both the local WiFi hotspot network DNS server and the OpenVPN DNS server.
                        DNS response received from both.  Making it possible for the local WiFi hotspot network DNS to provide an address that sends the client to a malicious site.

                        OpenVPN Forum Thread:
                        https://forums.openvpn.net/viewtopic.php?t=15939

                        ![OpenVPN DNS.jpg](/public/imported_attachments/1/OpenVPN DNS.jpg)
                        ![OpenVPN DNS.jpg_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/OpenVPN DNS.jpg_thumb)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • K
                          kpa
                          last edited by

                          Are you handing out one or two DNS forwarders during the OpenVPN tunnel set up? If you're handing out just one forwarder Windows may keep the second forwarder from the initial DHCP setup and combine it with the one it got from the OpenVPN tunnel set up. Try giving the client at least two DNS forwarders and see how it behaves then.

                          But yes, this has almost nothing to do with OpenVPN itself. Windows is known for its "creative adaptations" of internet standards and this is just one of them.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • johnpozJ
                            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                            last edited by

                            Well my home box that I showed was static IP on its local interface..

                            Its quite possible windows does something odd with dhcp.. It sure and the F shouldn't but as stated MS likes to go their own route sometimes when it comes to standards.

                            I vpn to my home network pretty much every single day from work, so happy to validate what your seeing.  That second query should not be happening - unless the fist 1 failed to answer or returned serv fail.  But again this has NOTHING to do with openvpn..  Openvpn just hands the client dns to use, it can not control the how the OS uses or doesn't use that info.

                            You did update your binding btw?  Your screenshot was of providers..  keep in mind if you enable or disable interfaces this order can and does change..  So double check it, from your sniff where the local dns was .001 second later I would assume vpn connection is first..  Its best to rename your interfaces so you know exactly what they are vs local connection 1, local connection 2 ;)

                            remoteaccess.png
                            remoteaccess.png_thumb

                            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • johnpozJ
                              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                              last edited by

                              Ok - from a quick test when I got into the office, I set client to redirect-gateway def1

                              now get this in my route print for default, before I was not redirecting

                              Active Routes:
                              Network Destination        Netmask          Gateway      Interface  Metric
                                        0.0.0.0          0.0.0.0      10.56.41.1      10.56.41.36    10
                                        0.0.0.0        128.0.0.0      10.0.200.5      10.0.200.6    20

                              Now what I noticed right off the bat was that it was sending dns to my local configured dns at 10.56.144.11 and 10.56.144.21 down my vpn connection.  This is all it was doing it was not sending anything to my 192.168.1.253 dns (pfsense) down the vpn..

                              So as suggested I added couple more entries fro dns to openvpn config.. so it handed out 192.168.1.253 3 times

                              Ethernet adapter vpn:

                              Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . : local.lan
                                Description . . . . . . . . . . . : TAP-Windows Adapter V9
                                Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-FF-5A-2F-7E-EA
                                DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
                                Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
                                IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.200.6(Preferred)
                                Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.252
                                Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Tuesday, May 27, 2014 10:19:14 AM
                                Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Wednesday, May 27, 2015 10:19:14 AM
                                Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
                                DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.0.200.5
                                DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.253
                                                                    192.168.1.253
                                                                    192.168.1.253
                                NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled

                              Now watching dns queries with wireshark - I only see dns queries to my pfsense box down the vpn.. Nothing going local at all.

                              Ok something is weird, I disconnected and connected again and now its only sending queries to my local dns - but down the gateway..  I don't have dns on my local segment to test that scenario.  Windows can do some odd shit for sure..  In this scenario you would be good because the queries would just go nowhere down your tunnel to those addresses..  If your worried about dns leakage, I would prob use a proxy on your vpn side and set your browser to use that proxy and setup in firefox for example the socks dns setting.

                              querydns.png
                              querydns.png_thumb

                              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • N
                                NOYB
                                last edited by

                                Pippin, Maybe this would be a better place to continue the "block-outside-dns" discussion from https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=110910.0
                                https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=110910.msg617893#msg617893

                                So verb 4 shows the logs as you have too.  So my only issue with this is that it eliminates resolution of local names.  Need those some places.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • johnpozJ
                                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                  last edited by

                                  continue??  this thread was from 2014 ;)

                                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • PippinP
                                    Pippin
                                    last edited by

                                    Hmm, ok I see, the difference is that I'm not in a road worrier situation.
                                    Connecting from home to my external server (NAS) which runs (adblocking) DNS and I can still talk to local.

                                    Maybe ask over at OpenVPN Community Forum or even better on the users mailing list?

                                    I gloomily came to the ironic conclusion that if you take a highly intelligent person and give them the best possible, elite education, then you will most likely wind up with an academic who is completely impervious to reality.
                                    Halton Arp

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • johnpozJ
                                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                      last edited by

                                      "Connecting from home to my external server"

                                      How is that not a road warrior connection??  You don't have a site to site setup do you?  If its not site to site then your road warrior.

                                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • PippinP
                                        Pippin
                                        last edited by

                                        I mean as in local is my home and my home is not switching networks  :)

                                        I gloomily came to the ironic conclusion that if you take a highly intelligent person and give them the best possible, elite education, then you will most likely wind up with an academic who is completely impervious to reality.
                                        Halton Arp

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • N
                                          NOYB
                                          last edited by

                                          @johnpoz:

                                          continue??  this thread was from 2014 ;)

                                          Continuing from the other thread that we had hijacked.
                                          Yes this thread is from 2014.  Is my thread that I started on the specific subject of local vs. VPN DNS name resolution, or more concisely put "DNS leakage", and previously there had not been a solid resolution to the issue.  So it is a very direct fit for the newly implemented "block-outside-dns" option discussion.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • johnpozJ
                                            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                            last edited by

                                            So what exactly do you want again.

                                            So you want to use your vpn dns, but not your local dns to resolve stuff other than local?  Is that what your after?  Yeah not going to happen..  How do you control your client to only ask the local dns where its at for stuff that is local, and ask your vpn dns for everything else..

                                            Or am I missing something?

                                            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.