Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Cant see other Wifi Clients.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Wireless
    14 Posts 5 Posters 2.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D
      DoyleChris
      last edited by

      In the First post i had mentioned that it is enabled.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DerelictD
        Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
        last edited by

        Then I guess it's broken.  Blame FreeBSD for listing a broken implementation in their HCL.

        Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
        A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
        DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
        Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          Guest
          last edited by

          All my working configs use Atheros.. I wouldn't waste my time trying to use a usb wifi interface. Especially RALink from the looks of the forum.

          Part of your problem looks to be related to the bridge. You do lose some capabilities when using a bridge interface I have found.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            DoyleChris
            last edited by

            wel mine is a internal card.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              Guest
              last edited by

              I don't apply the "pfil" patch in any recent configurations and i am not sure its needed anymore. I know there are inherent issues with bridging interfaces. You lose the granularity of port control for one and i know for RRD you lose stats for the individual interfaces, which is fine for a bridge. But i could also see this having other issues like you are experiencing. If you build a non-bridged AP is it still an issue? Could it be a rule not being properly applied on the correct interface. Things to check.. I usually turn off NAT/firewall until i get mine tuned.
              Good Luck

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ?
                Guest
                last edited by

                Have you tried disabling the firewall temporary(for testing) under System>Advanced>Firewall/NAT>Disable Firewall

                Break the problem down to the simplest parts.

                It sounds like you had the RALink card going for 6 months so I seriously doubt it is a hardware issue. Probably a bad setting somewhere.

                You don't mention what your clients machines OS are and if Windows you obviously have more to troubleshoot.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  DoyleChris
                  last edited by

                  I have had this problem since i installed the card. which has been about 6 months. Ill try disabling the firewall to see if it works.  Well before with a normal AP before it died everything was fine,  and its a mix of windows 7,8 and android.  And i dont think its windows because when they are wired to the network they work fine.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • E
                    edmund
                    last edited by

                    Have you tried turning off the bridge and seeing if the wireless clients can communicate with the bridge off?

                    I have a pfSense system with an Atheros card and had a lot of problems getting both the bridge AND the inter-client communications to work some years ago.  Since then I've disabled the internal Atheros card.  These days I've found that the solution in the pfSense manual works best - using the LAN side of a commercial hardware AP.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D
                      doktornotor Banned
                      last edited by

                      +1, the bridge is just pointless and really bad idea in general.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ?
                        Guest
                        last edited by

                        In the past there have been bugs relating to Wifi encryption. (WPA-Supplicant)
                        When i say break it down to just essentials I mean no encryption. Just the bare basics.
                        Just for testing of course.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.