PfBlockerNG
-
Seems like they may be waiting for 2.2 final before releasing it.
-
Seems like they may be waiting for 2.2 final before releasing it.
I'm thinking more inline that they are utilizing their resources to get 2.2 final before they can assign a resource to review the code. Compare to other packages, there is a ton of code in this baby.. It does run on 2.1.5 and 2.2. I can see it taking time for them to QA it before it's release to the public.
Then wait for the next release, so far I'm blocking 64772 domains as of today.. -
Easily my most favourite package on pfsense. Just wish I could help BBcan177 with the coding, rather than pointing out things that don't work. It's a tonne of code that he's put into it.
-
Easily my most favourite package on pfsense. Just wish I could help BBcan177 with the coding, rather than pointing out things that don't work. It's a tonne of code that he's put into it.
I'm sure once we mere mortals may admire this package too, I will offer BB a nice cup of coffee ;D
-
I know it's the wrong thread but had to ask… ;D any news on updates for Dans or e2guardian in the private repository?
-
I know it's the wrong thread but had to ask… ;D any news on updates for Dans or e2guardian in the private repository?
I dont know of any private repo for dansguardian or e2guardian… Maybe ask on the numerous duplicate squid threads out there?
-
-
This whole thing with people posting how they have PfblockerNG while telling everybody else to be patient is…offputting.
-
I want to get that soon as it comes out.. 2.2 is in release now..
-
;) Thanks for the patience.. I will try my best to get it released asap. But unfortunately it's not in my control.
-
I love this package, it helps me sleep at night! ;D
-
I see it in the pkgconfig on github. So I guess be in here soon? or is it already?
https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense-packages/blob/master/pkg_config.10.xml
-
I see it in the pkgconfig on github. So I guess be in here soon? or is it already?
Been there for a month. Not really useful with
<required_version>3.0</required_version> -
Seems to take quite some time to implement into pfsense package repository… not good!
-
Seems to take quite some time to implement into pfsense package repository… not good!
It's already there, but it's being tested by ESF before it's released for the public. doktornotor's post above shows the reason why it's not showing up on 2.1.5 or 2.2 :)
-
why it's not showing up on 2.1.5 or 2.2 :)
Maybe it could with a bit of unsupported fiddling with /etc/version :P
-
why it's not showing up on 2.1.5 or 2.2 :)
Maybe it could with a bit of unsupported fiddling with /etc/version :P
I knew there's a way to fool the system, but didn't know the right place :)
-
Note: If someone does this, I'd suggest revert the change immediately after the package is installed.
-
Seems to take quite some time to implement into pfsense package repository… not good!
I think I will wipe the dirt from my other diploma, that from law school, and speak in defense of ( ;D ):
The Pfsense team has worked hard on 2.2; I'm sure that took, and still takes, almost all of their time.
't Makes (pf)sense to me that other work gets delayed with relatively limited resources.
-
why it's not showing up on 2.1.5 or 2.2 :)
Maybe it could with a bit of unsupported fiddling with /etc/version :P
Don't you all appreciate that multiple sets of eyes look at code before it gets released for your perimeter security appliance :) ?
I appreciate that procedure, and I'm sure BB does too, as perhaps the pfSense team notices things BB overlooked (that happens: when you look too much at something, you develop a sort of 'blindness' for things. I'm sure BB looked alot at the code ;D . I suffer from the same: in the end, after looking at Excel sheets for 10 hours, you don't see anything anymore.)