Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PfBlockerNG

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfBlockerNG
    1.2k Posts 210 Posters 1.8m Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      pfsense_fan009
      last edited by

      I did wait for 20minutes:

      Converting MaxMind Country Databases for pfBlockerNG. This may take a few minutes…

      I'm running this on a alix 2d13 on 2.2 (I had pfBlocker installed before installing the pfblockerNG).
      Suggestions ?

      @wcrowder:

      How long did your wait? What did the logs say? Look at the geoip.log, did it finish downloading?

      @pfsense_fan009:

      I could nog fully install this: hangs at converting…

      Pfsense 2.x on Alix 2d13 (dual wan with failover).

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R
        raab
        last edited by

        @marcus556:

        Since i turned de-duplication on, i havent been seeing any hits and the internet traffic is running much smoother.  Should i still being seeing some hits though?

        EDIT

        I changed the inbound and outbound interface to WAN and it seems to be working again.

        You should set inbound to WAN and outbound to LAN.

        On your ipv4 lists if you want to block in and out you set "Deny Both". In saying that you don't need to block incoming as it's blocked by default, unless you have multiple ports opened you don't need to blocking incoming unless you like seeing things being blocked.

        I can't see how deduplication would make things faster other than removing duplicate IP addresses in multiple lists, then I can't see how it would be slow in the first place

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          marcus556
          last edited by

          @raab:

          @marcus556:

          Since i turned de-duplication on, i havent been seeing any hits and the internet traffic is running much smoother.  Should i still being seeing some hits though?

          EDIT

          I changed the inbound and outbound interface to WAN and it seems to be working again.

          You should set inbound to WAN and outbound to LAN.

          On your ipv4 lists if you want to block in and out you set "Deny Both". In saying that you don't need to block incoming as it's blocked by default, unless you have multiple ports opened you don't need to blocking incoming unless you like seeing things being blocked.

          I can't see how deduplication would make things faster other than removing duplicate IP addresses in multiple lists, then I can't see how it would be slow in the first place

          So basically I need to be looking at it this way, im the firewall what ever traffic I receive from the internet/WAN is considered inbound and whatever I send out it going to my internal LAN?  Correct?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            doktornotor Banned
            last edited by

            @pfsense_fan009:

            Converting MaxMind Country Databases for pfBlockerNG. This may take a few minutes…
            I'm running this on a alix 2d13 on 2.2 (I had pfBlocker installed before installing the pfblockerNG).
            Suggestions ?

            Look at the system logs if you see any Killed entry there.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • BBcan177B
              BBcan177 Moderator
              last edited by

              @marcus556:

              So basically I need to be looking at it this way, im the firewall what ever traffic I receive from the internet/WAN is considered inbound and whatever I send out it going to my internal LAN?  Correct?

              Yes!  :)  Wan = Inbound , Lan = Outbound

              "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

              Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
              Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
              Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                marcus556
                last edited by

                @BBcan177:

                @marcus556:

                So basically I need to be looking at it this way, im the firewall what ever traffic I receive from the internet/WAN is considered inbound and whatever I send out it going to my internal LAN?  Correct?

                Yes!  :)  Wan = Inbound , Lan = Outbound

                Thanks, this all is starting to fall into place now.  Now that i have my inbound and outbound interfaces set correctly, the adblock lists aren't really as bad as i thought they were.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A
                  AndrewZ
                  last edited by

                  @pfsense_fan009:

                  Converting MaxMind Country Databases for pfBlockerNG. This may take a few minutes…

                  I'm running this on a alix 2d13 on 2.2

                  Running the same hardware, "Converting …" takes a few minutes.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • B
                    Bummer
                    last edited by

                    I finally upgraded to pfSense 2.2 and pfBlockerNG. Wow, wlot of stuff has been added!

                    Is there an instructions for pfBlockerNG that I can read up on? Much of what I see is like trying to read Latin and I don't want to mess anything up

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • T
                      Topper727
                      last edited by

                      I have earlier in this topic posted some setup screens captures for people to see the setup. If need help with something just ask here or message me I will help

                      Dell 2950 g3 server
                      Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz
                      Current: 2000 MHz, Max: 2667 MHz
                      8 CPUs: 2 package(s) x 4 core(s)
                      8152 MiB and 600meg 10k drive
                      Pfsense 2.4 .. Hoping to get the phpvirtualbox going again.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • BBcan177B
                        BBcan177 Moderator
                        last edited by

                        I have submitted Pull Request #820 to fix the following issues:

                        1. Issue for Nano and Ramdisk Installations -

                        The /var and /tmp folders get wiped on Reboot. This will delete the /var/db/aliastables folder which on Reboot causes a 60 second timeout per pfBNG Alias (Which for some can timeout for 20mins). The new functionality will now Archive the Aliastables on any Alias updates.

                        Using the **<earlyshellcmd></earlyshellcmd>**functionality, it will restore the archived Aliastables on reboot to prevent this issue.

                        However, all of the other /var/db/pfblockerng files are also deleted. To restore those files, a "Force Update" is required or ultimately will get restored by the next CRON run. This however, will not affect the reboot process.

                        If you manually patched the download_file() function from 60 secs to 5 secs. You can revert that change as its not required with these new changes.

                        2. Improved the Alerts Tab to handle a Large firewall log file (as 2.2 has functionality to increase the size of the log file). These changes should result in a 50-75% improvement in loading/CPU usage. The Javascript functions were also improved to avoid it being called when the "Auto Resolve" checkbox was not enabled. This was spinning up 2-3 additional php-fpm processes. A timeout was also added to reduce the hostname lookup to 30seconds. If you refresh the Alerts Page shortly after it loads, it can seem to take a little longer, but this is due to the hostname lookups that are still in progress.

                        3. Made additional improvements to the IPv6 Regex functionality.

                        4. This will bump the pfBNG version to 1.05.

                        "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                        Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                        Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                        Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S
                          st4t1c
                          last edited by

                          Good evening and thanks for the wonderfull package.

                          I'm trying to configure it properly and I have a certain question.

                          Lets say I use 2 lists

                          The first list has 200 IPs inside, which I have configured it to "Deny Inbound" (I got lots of open ports)

                          The second list has 150 IPs inside, and I have configured it to "Deny Both"

                          On the second list 100 IPs are the same as the first list, so after deduplication I assume that we're left with 50 IPs blocked by the "Deny Both" rule applied on that list.

                          Are the deduplicated IPs fall under the "Deny Inbound" or "Deny Both" rule since after the deduplication they're not "left" on the second list?

                          p.s sorry for my bad english, i'm not a native speaker.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • B
                            Bummer
                            last edited by

                            Okay, here are a few dumb questions with more to follow after I get these answers.

                            I'd like to subscribe to a few lists. They can be free or paid for, as long as they are kept current and are fairly complete. I am aware of I-Blocklist. Are there any that are better?

                            Whatever I do, I need to be sure this won't affect my clients and thir ability to conduct normal business. The only country I block at this time is China, they are unmerciful in their attacks.

                            I'm interested to subscribing to several lists. For instance, a spammer list (hacked IPs, etc) that are known for sending email spam, a hacker list (hacked IPs used for attempting to hack other servers for whatever reasons), and any other lists that may protect my network.

                            I really appreciate your input. Depending on the answer(s), I'll have more questions.

                            Thank you for your time.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • K
                              kaneda
                              last edited by

                              Hi
                              I had a Pfblocker using OSSIM ip list.
                              One valid peer vas included in the block list and starting to be blocked, after a few days, it was out of the list but still if I ping from behind any of firewall interfaces, my ping or telnet :25 does not get any answer.

                              At firewall logs I see the source and destination ip with a green mark so it appear to pass, but all replies to 25 TCP port and icmp are timed out.

                              I updated to pfsense 2.2, installed PFblockerNG and delected old list from directory, I deleted all old pfblocker firewall rules but still I have not response.

                              If I ssh into the firewall and try to telnet to 25 from firewall it answer without problem, but not answer behind any other int.
                              What could be hapeninng?

                              Im getting crazy guys

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • W
                                wcrowder
                                last edited by

                                Use "Deny Outbound", pfSense will "Deny Inbound" on it's own because it is a Stateful Firewall. See this post from BBCan177: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=86212.msg488949#msg488949.

                                For more information on a "Stateful Firewall" see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stateful_firewall.

                                @st4t1c:

                                Good evening and thanks for the wonderfull package.

                                I'm trying to configure it properly and I have a certain question.

                                Lets say I use 2 lists

                                The first list has 200 IPs inside, which I have configured it to "Deny Inbound" (I got lots of open ports)

                                The second list has 150 IPs inside, and I have configured it to "Deny Both"

                                On the second list 100 IPs are the same as the first list, so after deduplication I assume that we're left with 50 IPs blocked by the "Deny Both" rule applied on that list.

                                Are the deduplicated IPs fall under the "Deny Inbound" or "Deny Both" rule since after the deduplication they're not "left" on the second list?

                                p.s sorry for my bad english, i'm not a native speaker.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • W
                                  wcrowder
                                  last edited by

                                  Are you sure you are allowing port 25 to "pass"? Check your rules. This does not sound like a pfBlockerNG problem. If you see a green [>] in the firewall logs; the IP is passed, but you could be blocking the port going the other way. Unsolicited "icmp" packets will be blocked by pfSense unless you allow them in the rules. Just a thought.

                                  @kaneda:

                                  Hi
                                  I had a Pfblocker using OSSIM ip list.
                                  One valid peer vas included in the block list and starting to be blocked, after a few days, it was out of the list but still if I ping from behind any of firewall interfaces, my ping or telnet :25 does not get any answer.

                                  At firewall logs I see the source and destination ip with a green mark so it appear to pass, but all replies to 25 TCP port and icmp are timed out.

                                  I updated to pfsense 2.2, installed PFblockerNG and delected old list from directory, I deleted all old pfblocker firewall rules but still I have not response.

                                  If I ssh into the firewall and try to telnet to 25 from firewall it answer without problem, but not answer behind any other int.
                                  What could be hapeninng?

                                  Im getting crazy guys

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • A
                                    azmo
                                    last edited by

                                    Do I understand correctly that to block countries based only on reputation I should choose "Alias Deny" for the country list and tick "Enable Max" in the Reputation tab ? Is that all there is to it ?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • BBcan177B
                                      BBcan177 Moderator
                                      last edited by

                                      @azmo:

                                      Do I understand correctly that to block countries based only on reputation I should choose "Alias Deny" for the country list and tick "Enable Max" in the Reputation tab ? Is that all there is to it ?

                                      Hi Azmo, if this is your first time setting up pfBNG, I would leave Reputation off, until you get the basics of it working. However, the settings in the "Reputation" tab have nothing to do with the Continent/Country Settings. You can set Continent/Country blocking using any "List Action" settings.

                                      For "Reputation", the Country Settings use a separate database. I hope that's clear.

                                      "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                                      Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                                      Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                                      Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • A
                                        azmo
                                        last edited by

                                        Thanks BB, I think I get it now. I've been running pfBlocker for a few years and am loving the upgrade to pfBlockerNG. It's just the Reputation stuff that's new to me. Thanks for your excellent work. Now we just need DNSBL …

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • BBcan177B
                                          BBcan177 Moderator
                                          last edited by

                                          Great.. Thanks azmo.. Make sure when you make "Reputation" changes… that you run a "Force Reload", this will reload each list with the new Reputation Settings.

                                          "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                                          Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                                          Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                                          Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • M
                                            MnM
                                            last edited by

                                            Hi,

                                            Is this package supposed to be available under packages?
                                            I can not see it there ..running 2.1.5

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.