• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

403 error

Forum Feedback
7
21
4.4k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ?
    A Former User
    last edited by Feb 26, 2015, 1:11 PM

    Posting this on behalf of another forum member.

    He (or she, cannot confirm nor deny anything) has said that they were not able to post anything, nor PM anybody. Attached is a screenshot showing the error:

    Anyone else finding the screenshot suspicious, or I'm I being overly paranoid (more than my normal level)?

    pfsenseforum.png
    pfsenseforum.png_thumb

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • D
      doktornotor Banned
      last edited by Feb 26, 2015, 2:31 PM

      Delete the forum.pfsense.org cookies. (I was never able to track why this BS happens, plus those links are absolutely useless and do not work and certainly do not fix anything.)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P
        phil.davis
        last edited by Feb 26, 2015, 3:12 PM

        I got this a day or 2 ago from home. My IP is behind CGN, so "everyone" in my town with my ISP ends up with the same public IP. I guess somebody was doing something naughty from that public IP.
        It was all fine when I got up the next morning.
        Anything that tries to establish the reputation of a public IP address is going to have more and more problems (with IPv4) in futre - as there are often 1,000 random private users behind some ISP public IP. One of those users is naughty and all 1,000 get a bad reputation.

        I pressed the "fix this problem yourself" button with no joy.

        As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
        If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          A Former User
          last edited by Feb 26, 2015, 3:14 PM

          Sharing a public IP like that is idiotic, to say the least  ;D

          I understand the 1 IP per household, but "carrier grade NAT" shouldn't be implemented like that.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            doktornotor Banned
            last edited by Feb 26, 2015, 3:17 PM

            @phil.davis:

            I got this a day or 2 ago from home. My IP is behind CGN, so "everyone" in my town with my ISP ends up with the same public IP. I guess somebody was doing something naughty from that public IP.

            Certainly not behind CGN… (In fact, my public IP hasn't changed for years.) Getting this 2-3 times a month. NFC what's the "protection" supposed to prevent.

            @phil.davis:

            I pressed the "fix this problem yourself" button with no joy.

            Yeah, no-op.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M
              Mr. Jingles
              last edited by Feb 26, 2015, 3:19 PM

              @doktornotor:

              Delete the forum

              I just tried that.

              ( ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D )

              6 and a half billion people know that they are stupid, agressive, lower life forms.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ?
                A Former User
                last edited by Feb 26, 2015, 3:20 PM

                Nooooo! think of the black hole!!!  :o

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  Mr. Jingles
                  last edited by Feb 26, 2015, 3:23 PM

                  @phil.davis:

                  "everyone" in my town with my ISP ends up with the same public IP.

                  as there are often 1,000 random private users behind some ISP public IP.

                  :o :o :o

                  Does the person in IT, whomever invented this, still do barter trade (e.g.: exchange a bucket of milk for some bread), or does he actually use pieces of paper as a medium to exchange?

                  Electronic banking. 'sGonna be big in a century or three, mark my words. It's often a burden, being the visionair that I am  :P

                  6 and a half billion people know that they are stupid, agressive, lower life forms.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    doktornotor Banned
                    last edited by Feb 26, 2015, 3:24 PM

                    Also, this cannot be IP-based, could not be solved via clearing cookies.

                    @Mr.:

                    @doktornotor:

                    Delete the forum

                    I just tried that.

                    ( ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D )

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      Mr. Jingles
                      last edited by Feb 26, 2015, 3:25 PM

                      @doktornotor:

                      NFC what's the "protection" supposed to prevent.

                      Your sentence reads a little bit weird to noobs like me:

                      Near Field Communication what's the "protection" supposed to prevent.
                      

                      And yes I was baptized a good catholic. Why?

                      ( ;D ;D ;D )

                      6 and a half billion people know that they are stupid, agressive, lower life forms.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ?
                        A Former User
                        last edited by Feb 26, 2015, 3:28 PM

                        I think "Not F***ing Certain" is more appropriate  :o

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M
                          Mr. Jingles
                          last edited by Feb 26, 2015, 3:31 PM

                          @jflsakfja:

                          I think "Not F***ing Certain" is more appropriate  :o

                          That's the problem with all these IT peoples: the minute you finally understand what they mean with an acronym, they change the game by replacing the words.

                          6 and a half billion people know that they are stupid, agressive, lower life forms.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • ?
                            A Former User
                            last edited by Feb 26, 2015, 3:32 PM

                            So do accountants, but instead of shortening words, they make them longer  ;)

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M
                              Mr. Jingles
                              last edited by Feb 26, 2015, 3:54 PM

                              When we released IFRS to the world, we made it clear, perfectly clear, that it stands for either:

                              International Financial Reporting Standards;

                              Incredibly Fine Rant System;

                              Improvable Functionally Retarded Setup;

                              'tIs the case of IT peoples: they never read manuals.

                              6 and a half billion people know that they are stupid, agressive, lower life forms.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • H
                                hda
                                last edited by Feb 26, 2015, 4:28 PM

                                @jflsakfja:

                                Posting this on behalf of another forum member.

                                Ah, when one connects tru Tor, such message too.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ?
                                  A Former User
                                  last edited by Feb 26, 2015, 4:32 PM

                                  When that forum member can't login because he/she/it isn't sure that the forum hasn't been compromised on their end, in fear of losing the password, which could or could not be used elsewhere, and having to go through a password reset.

                                  Or in general when others can't post, as in the error came up when they were trying to post.

                                  Tor has (and always will) be operated by U.S. government subsidiaries. No need for yet another attack layer on my networks. I got enough headaches trying to keep up with letter-soup-agencies trying to actively break in.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • C
                                    cmb
                                    last edited by Mar 1, 2015, 7:44 AM

                                    If you get a 403, please take note of the "tech support code" it shows you, and you can PM it to me here, or email forum at pfsense.org.

                                    Unless it's because you're coming in via a Tor exit node. We do not intentionally block Tor, however we block known actively malicious source IPs where significant abuse has recently occurred. Please submit the Tor exit node's IP to httpBL/Project Honeypot to get it whitelisted. Obtaining a new identity on Tor is commonly enough to re-gain access.

                                    @doktornotor:

                                    Delete the forum.pfsense.org cookies. (I was never able to track why this BS happens, plus those links are absolutely useless and do not work and certainly do not fix anything.)

                                    I'm pretty sure what you're describing is something I killed off a few days ago after getting an email from someone who hit it with the "tech support code". that's this: https://redmine.ioerror.us/issues/72

                                    the same thing still happens to some after it was "fixed". I disabled that check since it seems useless and problematic.

                                    There were a couple other situations along the same lines that I just disabled a bit ago. That includes the one OP listed in this thread.

                                    I also cleaned up the error page a bit in the source.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • D
                                      doktornotor Banned
                                      last edited by Mar 1, 2015, 8:10 AM

                                      @cmb:

                                      @doktornotor:

                                      Delete the forum.pfsense.org cookies. (I was never able to track why this BS happens, plus those links are absolutely useless and do not work and certainly do not fix anything.)

                                      I'm pretty sure what you're describing is something I killed off a few days ago after getting an email from someone who hit it with the "tech support code". that's this: https://redmine.ioerror.us/issues/72

                                      Last time I was getting this about the exact time this thread was started. In fact, any time I got this, it was always solved by deleting cookies. The "fix this problem yourself" link is something that never produced any useful action solving the problem for me.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • C
                                        cmb
                                        last edited by Mar 2, 2015, 3:21 AM

                                        @doktornotor:

                                        Last time I was getting this about the exact time this thread was started. In fact, any time I got this, it was always solved by deleting cookies.

                                        I deleted the stupid rule in question in that badbehavior bug I linked about the time this thread started, so it most likely was that.

                                        @doktornotor:

                                        The "fix this problem yourself" link is something that never produced any useful action solving the problem for me.

                                        I removed that link entirely because, yeah, it's useless.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • K
                                          kejianshi
                                          last edited by Mar 2, 2015, 3:48 AM

                                          So I don't have to periodically flush all pfsense.org related cookies and cache anymore?  ;D

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          9 out of 21
                                          • First post
                                            9/21
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.