Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    About the spam trols

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Forum Feedback
    40 Posts 16 Posters 8.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stephenw10S
      stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
      last edited by

      Is it possible to stop new users posting URLs or at least make them non-clickable?

      Steve

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jdillardJ
        jdillard
        last edited by

        I've slowly been exploring Discourse as an option to migrate to: http://www.discourse.org/

        Twitter, among others, uses it for their developer community: https://twittercommunity.com/

        Someone has written a migration tool for SMF 2 (that still needs to be looked at and tested): https://meta.discourse.org/t/importer-for-simple-machines-2-forums/17656

        Sam and Jeff come from StackExchange where they had a lot of experience with dealing with spam and have some interesting solutions: https://meta.discourse.org/t/what-about-the-spam-problem/2724/6

        Also, it isn't PHP, is mobile friendly, etc.

        There is no time frame on the potential migration, but Discourse has a pretty hefty lead at this point.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • chpalmerC
          chpalmer
          last edited by

          My vote is stay SMF. (that is if I have one…  ;D )

          Ive been on many different forums and seems to me the spammers have ways into any of them.  They seem to propagate to the forums with the most traffic and hover there.

          Staying vigilant about deleting their posts and accounts quickly seems paramount to making them feel unwelcome.

          Seems like those most successful at halting them at the gate have an approval process that takes lots of time.

          Triggering snowflakes one by one..
          Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            cmb
            last edited by

            @chpalmer:

            My vote is stay SMF. (that is if I have one…  ;D )

            Everyone's opinion is welcome. Whether or not they hold any weight is at our discretion. ;D We definitely put heavy weight towards the majority opinions of community members in manners such as these.

            My vote, at this instant at least, is to stay with SMF as well. Maybe there's a compelling reason to move to a new platform at some point, but I don't see one right now. I'm not opposed to change if there is a better option at some point.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              kejianshi
              last edited by

              Good luck killing all the spam.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • H
                heper
                last edited by

                if it's too much work to deal with spam, then esf should ask for / appoint some more mods , to help deal with the spamming.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • jdillardJ
                  jdillard
                  last edited by

                  Just to be clear, this is something I have mostly been doing on my free time out of personal interest in methods of community organizing. I only replied because the subject came up in this thread. SMF has and continues to do a great job for us and looks healthy: https://github.com/SimpleMachines/SMF2.1/graphs/contributors

                  To me forum software has basically been different flavors of the same lollipop until more recently where some interesting solutions to organizing online communities and their generated discussions have been tried and tested.

                  In terms of spam, I view putting creative locks on the front door and assigning certain people the privilege of hitting anything with a bat that looks like spam that comes though as a little old school (but still necessary mind you). When possible I prefer to arm everyone (well this analogy escalated quickly) and leave bouncers as a last resort.

                  Spam also wasn't the only "problem" I was trying to see has been solved more elegantly elsewhere. Other features of note:

                  • just-in-time loading so you don't have to slog through pages if you forget what page a post was on

                  • one level threaded comments (on the fence, but seems to prove useful in a Q&A support scenario): http://blog.codinghorror.com/discussions-flat-or-threaded/

                  • live preview of reply text, with out having to leave the context of the thread.

                  • comprehensive API

                  • community moderation (i.e. arming everyone)

                  • so much more: http://www.discourse.org/about/

                  If this ever gets to a point where I have tested it and feel comfortable with a migration, there would be plenty of community input pre and post migration as before: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,65565.0.html, but for now it is merely one idea of many.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DerelictD
                    Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                    last edited by

                    I think there should be a quiz before you can post.  It would be beneficial to stop both spam and the same questions over and over again.  Example:

                    To allow pfSense traffic from LAN hosts to the Internet, any necessary firewall rules must be placed on which interface?

                    1. WAN
                    2. LAN
                    3. Both WAN and LAN
                    4. No firewall rules are necessary.

                    See Also: https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Firewall_Rule_Troubleshooting#Interface_Selection

                    Maybe a couple of those at random…

                    Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                    A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                    DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                    Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • N
                      Nullity
                      last edited by

                      @Derelict:

                      I think there should be a quiz before you can post.  It would be beneficial to stop both spam and the same questions over and over again.  Example:

                      To allow pfSense traffic from LAN hosts to the Internet, any necessary firewall rules must be placed on which interface?

                      1. WAN
                      2. LAN
                      3. Both WAN and LAN
                      4. No firewall rules are necessary.

                      See Also: https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Firewall_Rule_Troubleshooting#Interface_Selection

                      Maybe a couple of those at random…

                      Oooh, I like that a lot. 2 birds, 1 stone. :)

                      Please correct any obvious misinformation in my posts.
                      -Not a professional; an arrogant ignoramous.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stephenw10S
                        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                        last edited by

                        The actual level of spam doesn't seem like a big problem currently. IMHO.

                        Steve

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • K
                          kejianshi
                          last edited by

                          Me too - I haven't noticed much spam.  Seems under control…

                          On a seperate note, please click the links below for great savings (-:

                          www.buymyjunk-itssuperawesome.com

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stephenw10S
                            stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
                            last edited by

                            Seems legit…..  :P

                            Steve

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • P
                              phil.davis
                              last edited by

                              @kejianshi:

                              Me too - I haven't noticed much spam.  Seems under control…

                              On a seperate note, please click the links below for great savings (-:

                              www.buymyjunk-itssuperawesome.com

                              I know you have a lot of (maybe not super-awesome) junk. So disappointed that the URL does not resolve  :(

                              As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
                              If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • K
                                kejianshi
                                last edited by

                                I'm actually penniless and junk-less.  I was hacked and had my identity stolen once…  After a short time, they returned it.  Thats how bad it is.

                                But yes - I don't think spam is such a problem now.  I think seeking perfection is a fools errand.  For great expense you could perhaps do a little better but its not worth it.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M
                                  Mr. Jingles
                                  last edited by

                                  @kejianshi:

                                  I think seeking perfection is a fools errand.

                                  I know at least 3 people (2 on this forum and 1 in my personal life), 1 company and 1 country who'd disagree with you  ;D

                                  6 and a half billion people know that they are stupid, agressive, lower life forms.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • K
                                    kejianshi
                                    last edited by

                                    Its like an arms race.  You can't win.  Its best to not compete but rather to seek a happy medium.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • ?
                                      A Former User
                                      last edited by

                                      @Mr.:

                                      @kejianshi:

                                      I think seeking perfection is a fools errand.

                                      I know at least 3 people (2 on this forum and 1 in my personal life), 1 company and 1 country who'd disagree with you  ;D

                                      Fool reporting for duty  ;D

                                      Didn't see anything about discourse before. Thanks for pointing that out. Seems like a pretty good option. The mobile (phones/tablets) focus is important IMHO, since there might be a lot of people that are reading up on the forums on phones/tablets when they mess something up and they are trying to fix it. Having an easier read would be helpful.

                                      My vote is for whatever lets us edit old posts :P

                                      Any chance of herding the offending IPs using a blocklist?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • M
                                        Mr. Jingles
                                        last edited by

                                        @kejianshi:

                                        Its like an arms race.  You can't win.

                                        ;D

                                        We economists have graphs and difficult formulas on both, as well as huge databases with empirical data. Our preliminary hypothesis is that he who aims at the top might actually get there, while he who aims at the bottom most certainly gets there  :P

                                        ( ;D )

                                        6 and a half billion people know that they are stupid, agressive, lower life forms.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • K
                                          kejianshi
                                          last edited by

                                          OK - So what exactly (not generally) will fix the spam once and for all?  Since you have the data…

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • N
                                            Nullity
                                            last edited by

                                            @kejianshi:

                                            OK - So what exactly (not generally) will fix the spam once and for all?  Since you have the data…

                                            That is the exact same question a spammer would ask… just sayin.

                                            Please correct any obvious misinformation in my posts.
                                            -Not a professional; an arrogant ignoramous.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.