*AIO* All-in-one box
-
Okay, so for testing it would be okay if I set the following?
proto: IPv4
Source: OPT1 address
port: *
destination: *
port: *
gateway: *and
proto: IPv4
Source: *
port: *
destination: OPT1 address
port: *
gateway: * -
pfSense rules only apply on traffic arriving on the interface. Your traffic from OPT1 clients would arrive on OPT1 when leaving that network, so you should only need to use the first rule - but you have "OPT1 Address" there (a single IP on the OPT1 range I think - I don't have a pfSense in front of me right now) which should be "OPT1 Network", look at the default rules for LAN and use those as a guide.
Your second rule means "traffic (arriving on the OPT1 interface) with destination OPT1 network will pass" (I'm correcting address to network again there). Traffic destined for for the OPT1 network would arrive on another interface, not OPT1, for example it arrives on WAN and is routed to and leaves OPT1. Any traffic from the OPT1 network to the OPT1 network would go directly from client to client, it would never arrive on the pfSense OPT1 interface. Your second rule shouldn't cause any problems but it won't achieve anything either.
-
Okay, the OPT1 is up and running.
I can now access internet with new clients over the AP…;D
-
Excellent, glad it is working. The other participants in this thread sound like they would appreciate feedback on performance and reliability so do let us know how you get on.
-
I will do some performance testing at the weekend and then report back.
Thank you for your help!!!
-
Seeing how they probably draw near max of the usb spec, i would separate the two usb connectors. Like one on front and one on back, just to make sure you are drawing from two different circuits. Maybe consider a powered hub if you have problems when radio is loaded. I always worry about killing my usb ports….
Glad to hear you got it going. -
Hey guys, sorry for the delay…
There were some problems with the stability of the wireless connections on pfsense.
I switched to OPNsense to see if this problem persists.On OPNsense (http://opnsense.org/) the stability of the wireless devices is much better (my experience by now).
I will keep on testing and maybe switch back to a newer version of pfSense later. -
You may have better luck with pfSense 2.2.1 - https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=89542.msg495521#msg495521
-
You may have better luck with pfSense 2.2.1 - https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=89542.msg495521#msg495521
Thanks!!
I will test that asap. -
just tested it with 2.2.1 but system always reboots after filling the screen…
:'( :(
-
Just to check, when I suggested 2.2.1 it hadn't been released yet and was available as a preview build. It was released for production in the last 24 hours, so are you using the actual release 2.2.1?
I updated to 2.2.1 this morning, no boot issues for me but I use an Atheros Mini PCIe card. Have you tried booting without the USB wireless devices plugged in to confirm that is what stops it booting?
-
I installed the actual 2.2.1 release.
Booting without the USB wifi devices is no problem.
Started the web configuration and then plugged in the devices (run0 & run1).
After assigning them to OPT1 and WAN the system reboots. -
Even if this makes a difference I am not sure how it helps you, but could you try plugging in and assigning just the WAN USB stick? I have seen systems (not pfSense, just computers in general) struggle with two or more identical USB devices, it may not be either one but a combination of both causing the fault.
Sorry I can't help with your actual problem but if just one stick works but not both it may help someone else assist you.
-
okay, I tested it this way and plugged in only 1 USB adapter, but without luck.
The system still reboots. :( -
So, now that you have all this USB NIC experience, what will you be recommending for people considering USB NICs in the future?
-
I think that this is a problem with the internal handling (drivers?) in pfSense, because the scenario (2x USB wireless NIC for WAN and OPT1) is working on OPNsense (v15.1.7.2) without errors… 8)
If I had the option to use external APs via cable, then I would perhaps prefer this way.
But I have only 1 internal NIC (for LAN) and there is no way to install an additional card.So, my recommendation is:
If it is possible to use external APs --> use them
If it is NOT possible --> wait for working update/release (or use OPNsense instead)For now I use OPNsense, but I will switch if there is a working version of pfSense.
-
Me, on the other hand. I'd have gone with something that allows as many physical interfaces as I need to begin with. If only 2 is available (1 WAN and 1 LAN), but I needed say 4 interfaces, I'd use pfsense + a vlan switch.
Switching to another distro is also an answer I guess if it gives you what you need but I think much of your pain has been self inflicted. (I've been there myself)
The real lesson I see here (and in other threads daily) is ask before you buy. Don't buy first then try to make it fit.
-
Sure, first ask then buy, but the devices worked with version 2.2 , only stability was poor.
Now they don't work with the actual 2.2.1
So I think there is a possibility that this is fixed soon 8) ;DOverall I spent about 100-120€, what is still within my planned budget.
-
I think there is also an argument for "the costs involved made X impossible from the beginning anyway, so I may as well take the zero-to-low budget Y option and make the best use of it". Not everyone can afford new computers, VLAN capable switches and multiple APs. I would agree though that if it hadn't worked he would have lost $40, and any right to complain or be surprised by any "I told you so" comments.
If MrCount has anything at all to show from something that would otherwise have gone in the bin, coupled with devices we advised him not to buy, our advice is still as valid as it was when we gave it and I would offer the same advice now, but I also congratulate him if he is happy with his
$40100-120€ worth of success. Of course $100s worth of success would be much more reliable but when you don't have $100s, you don't have $100s.Well done, MrCount.
Edit - corrected prices, $127? Less economically sound as I first thought but well, the sentiment is still there!
-
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA24G2HZ3766&cm_re=vlan--33-704-224--Product
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833389064