Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    0.0.0.0 IGMP spam in WAN log & LAN traffic being blocked

    Firewalling
    9
    23
    10.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Z
      Zenit
      last edited by

      Hello Everyone,

      I have been running PFSense for a while on my network and it has been great so far. I have some minor issues that need to be ironed out, so I thought I would start with the firewall log being spammed with superfluous entries.

      Every few minutes the firewall records a blocked IGMP connection from 0.0.0.0 on the WAN to 224.0.0.1 on the LAN side - its filling up the log and makes it difficult to manage. I tried making a rule to hide entries from 0.0.0.0 from the log but it did not work. The traffic is being blocked by the built in bogon rule.

      The other minor issue is how PFSense is terminating legitimate LAN traffic - its mostly HTTPS sessions on port 443. Its not stopping anything from working, just fills up the log with LAN entries. Google sites or Amazon AWS hosted sites seem to have this happen the most.

      Thanks!

      PFSense Setup: 2.2ghz Core 2 E4500, 1gb RAM, 40gb HDD, 1x Intel GigE NIC + 1x Marvell GigE NIC, SeaSonic 300w PSU

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jahonixJ
        jahonix
        last edited by

        Yeah, I see those entries as well since 2.2 or 2.2.1
        I get them from 0.0.0.0 on some local interfaces and from one IF address (10.0.3.1) directly.
        Going to look at it again after 2.2.2 is out. IIRC there were issues with IGMP on redmine.

        ![Bildschirmfoto 2015-04-09 um 13.08.14.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/Bildschirmfoto 2015-04-09 um 13.08.14.png)
        ![Bildschirmfoto 2015-04-09 um 13.08.14.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Bildschirmfoto 2015-04-09 um 13.08.14.png_thumb)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
          last edited by

          Why would you be blocking bogon on a lan interface??  Your lan rules only have allow your lan source do they not, so why would you need to block bogon?

          Yeah 0.0.0.0/8 is in bogon, so that would be blocked..  What interface is LADEN?  Clearly that source is private - is that a wan interface and your seeing traffic from a private on it?  Are you behind a router or does you wan have public on it?

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jahonixJ
            jahonix
            last edited by

            Yes, my WAN has a public IP (PPPoE via DSL).
            All but OpenVPN are local VLAN interfaces as can be seen in the screenshot below.
            "Laden" is German for "store".

            ![Bildschirmfoto 2015-04-09 um 16.50.34.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/Bildschirmfoto 2015-04-09 um 16.50.34.png)
            ![Bildschirmfoto 2015-04-09 um 16.50.34.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Bildschirmfoto 2015-04-09 um 16.50.34.png_thumb)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • 2
              2chemlud Banned
              last edited by

              Hi!

              I had to change my 'DSL-modem (now: Draytek Vigor 130 in modem mode) and since then (2 days) I have spam from 0.0.0.0 to 255.255.255.255 port 4944 on the WAN interface of my pfSense (2.2.1 nano 386).

              I have a block rule without logging on top of the WAN rules, but the log spamming continues…

              0000.JPG
              0000.JPG_thumb
              ![block Dratek spam.JPG](/public/imported_attachments/1/block Dratek spam.JPG)
              ![block Dratek spam.JPG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/block Dratek spam.JPG_thumb)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • johnpozJ
                johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                last edited by

                there is nothing you can do with that because the block is happening before your rule not to log..  0.0.0.0/8 is is in bogon..  Turn off bogon logging if you don't want to see the noise it blocks or don't block it and then your rule would block it without log before it hits the default rule that blocks

                as to traffic to 4944??  Have no idea what that is.. I would guess p2p.. but broadcast?  I would sniff the traffic and look to what it is, might give you some clue how to turn it off if coming from your modem itself, etc.. Or atleast info to ask your isp about, etc.

                bogonlogging.png
                bogonlogging.png_thumb

                An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • jahonixJ
                  jahonix
                  last edited by

                  2chemlud, your logs clearly show UDP traffic to a broadcast address. This thread is about IGMP to a multicast address. Please don't hijack.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • johnpozJ
                    johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                    last edited by

                    same problem traffic blocked by bogon because of the source IP being 0.0.0.0 - just don't log bogon.. Problem solved.

                    An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                    If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                    Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                    SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • jahonixJ
                      jahonix
                      last edited by

                      Not logging bogons doesn't help with me. It even says "The rule that blocked this traffic is:      " with no bogons or whatsoever logging.
                      Basically I wonder why my pfSense install sends out IGMP requests on 0.0.0.0 or in one case from its IF address. That's regardless of activating the IGMP proxy or not. Even the switches do not have IGMP snooping or even querier turned on.
                      I see this in the office (2.2.1) and at home (2.2) with slightly different behavior, both Nano-installs on PCengines APU boards. The amount of logged "noise" renders the log completely useless. There's hardly anything else in there.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        doktornotor Banned
                        last edited by

                        Stop wasting your time. This IGMP log flood does NOT come from anything user configured and CANNOT be stopped by anything user configured. https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4383

                        The only way to hide the spam from the GUI is reverting the patch that made the log entries visible. However, the firewall logs will STILL be flooded with the junk, it won't make the actual logging go away.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Z
                          Zenit
                          last edited by

                          So, the IGMP 0.0.0.0 WAN to LAN issue is a bug in PFSense that we cant work around? According to that bug report the target release for the patch is 2.2.3, which I assume is some time away.

                          I have attached what it looks like in my log.

                          Also, LAN traffic being blocked is also flooding the log in a similar fashion to the 0.0.0.0 IGMP traffic. The default firewall rule set is in place. Akamai, Microsoft, and Google are the most common destinations that end up being spammed in the log.

                          I did set the firewall optimization to Conservative to try to get legit idle sessions to stay open, but that did not seem to make much of a difference.

                          Capture.PNG
                          Capture.PNG_thumb
                          lanblock.PNG
                          lanblock.PNG_thumb

                          PFSense Setup: 2.2ghz Core 2 E4500, 1gb RAM, 40gb HDD, 1x Intel GigE NIC + 1x Marvell GigE NIC, SeaSonic 300w PSU

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • D
                            doktornotor Banned
                            last edited by

                            Yes, IGMP is a known bug as linked above.

                            The other thing is out of state trafic non-issue and and completely offtopic here.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • jahonixJ
                              jahonix
                              last edited by

                              @doktornotor:

                              This IGMP log flood does NOT come from anything user configured and CANNOT be stopped by anything user configured.

                              Does that mean that every installation since 2.2. is affected? I somehow doubt that, not seeing it with other installs at clients.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • D
                                doktornotor Banned
                                last edited by

                                Whether or not you see it depends on whether or not you are being hit by IGMP traffic.

                                https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=88029.0

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • jahonixJ
                                  jahonix
                                  last edited by

                                  Starts to make sense, thanks.
                                  I know which install I surely will not update until this is solved…

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • B
                                    Bronko
                                    last edited by

                                    @2chemlud:

                                    Hi!

                                    I had to change my 'DSL-modem (now: Draytek Vigor 130 in modem mode) and since then (2 days) I have spam from 0.0.0.0 to 255.255.255.255 port 4944 on the WAN interface of my pfSense (2.2.1 nano 386).

                                    I have a block rule without logging on top of the WAN rules, but the log spamming continues…

                                    Solved the issue with my Draytek Vigor 130 by UNmarking "Broadcast DSL status to LAN" under ->System Maintenance->Management

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • 2
                                      2chemlud Banned
                                      last edited by

                                      Cool! Any way to access the Draytek through the pfSense or do I need to remove it before I can reach the Draytek's weg GUI?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • B
                                        Bronko
                                        last edited by

                                        @2chemlud:

                                        Cool! Any way to access the Draytek through the pfSense or do I need to remove it before I can reach the Draytek's weg GUI?

                                        Yes: https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Accessing_modem_from_inside_firewall  ;)

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • C
                                          cmb
                                          last edited by

                                          The root cause here is fixed in 2.2.3.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • B
                                            Bronko
                                            last edited by

                                            Ok, thanks for your 2.2.3 note, but the thread was hijacked  ;)

                                            @jahonix:

                                            2chemlud, your logs clearly show UDP traffic to a broadcast address. This thread is about IGMP to a multicast address. Please don't hijack.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.