Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Switched from Hyper-V 2012 R2 to VMware 6…

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Virtualization
    4 Posts 3 Posters 1.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      JasonJoel
      last edited by

      Just a comment post…

      I had my pfSense running on Hyper-V 2012 R2. Everything worked, but it seemed like there was more latency on the network traffic. I tried measuring it various different ways, but wasn't ever able to prove it with data.

      In any case, I needed to setup an ESXi 6.0 server for testing anyway, so I created a new pfSense VM there and imported the configuration, and I have to say it runs much better.

      By better I mean web pages load quicker, and with the same traffic and packages/filtering, the VMware VM uses right at 1/3 the CPU.

      I have a feeling Hyper-V wasn't playing nicely with my Intel I210 NICs, but am not sure if that was a driver thing or a Hyper-V thing. But I do know that the interrupt CPU utilization was much higher on Hyper-V than it is on ESXi.

      Jason

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A
        Arboleda
        last edited by

        Curious on vsphere whether you did vmxnet3 or e1000 nics.  I just did a vsphere pfsense install and went e1000 but wondered whether I should re-do with vmxnet3.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          JasonJoel
          last edited by

          I used vmxnet3. I did not try it with e1000 or e1000e - although I probably should sometime if I get a free few minutes.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • johnpozJ
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
            last edited by

            I have switched back to e1000 from vmx3 - even though freebsd has native support now.  I don't like that it only shows autoselect for speed and was giving errors with cdp reporting half duplex..  While e1000 works fine and don't have these issues.

            I use the ladvd package to have pfsense report via cdp and lldp, etc..

            While there is most like a bit of performance benefit with using vmx3 over the e1000, not an issue for me since only routing traffic for home network with a 50/10 internet connection.  While I wish it could have more bandwidth between segments.  The testing I did between vmx3 and e1000 was so small better to get my cdp and lldp info

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post
            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.