2.2.4-RELEASE Coming Soon
-
Good !
Was looking for a reason to canceled this weekend beach trip. Snapshot testing gave me one !
2.2.4(64) on Dell Dimension 5120 triple NIC up and humming.
Real time info : => Portal clients are happy. -
Ha, that's dedication. ;)
Steve
-
Ha, that's dedication. ;)
Or a mental defect. I can't decide which one :P
-
I guess it depends on the beach
-
@KOM:
Or a mental defect. I can't decide which one :P
Your close ;)
It was a "Honey, I really need you to pay me that new bikini" situation.
A 10 square inch piece with the +800 $ price tag.2.2.4 still ok.
pppoe IPv4 switch ok.
he.net IPv6 good. -
It was a "Honey, I really need you to pay me that new bikini" situation.
A 10 square inch piece with the +800 $ price tag.You can buy her an SG series device at less per square inch 8)
-
Ok guys… cleaned up what most would consider NSFW. Though we enjoyed it, this thread is linked across a variety of our social media accounts and a lot of people follow those from work. Please keep it clean.
-
@cmb:
Please keep it clean.
Sorry dad! :P
On topic- two of my sites have been on 2.2.4 D for just over a week and no issues to report! Both on latest as of last snap. One of them is on an MLPPP connection. :)
-
Everything tested out fine. Release will come after I get up tomorrow (not going to drop a release, then go to bed).
-
@cmb:
Everything tested out fine. Release will come after I get up tomorrow (not going to drop a release, then go to bed).
And why would you go to bed? No dedication :P
And anyway it looks like it is early AM in your timezone already. -
Do it! :)
I migrated exchange server and went on vacation lol :) -
I migrated exchange server and went on vacation lol :)
In fact that's an extremely wise decision. (Of course, leave your mobile phone at home or switched off… :P)
-
If I could politely ask: is the firewall rules log mess, that has existed ever since 2.0, finally fixed?
As in descriptions don't match the actual rules, and the non descriptions, only (@540645064) kind of descriptions, making the FW log utterly useless?
-
Hmm, a number of log issues were fixed for 2.2.3:
https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/2.2.3_New_Features_and_Changes#Rules.2FAliases.2FNAT
I know you're running an earlier version. That may have already been addressed.Steve
-
Do we know if it includes the very recent last fin fix?
https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-15:13.tcp.asc
-
Do we know if it includes the very recent last fin fix?
https://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-15:13.tcp.asc
Yes. It's generally not applicable for our use cases though. https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php?title=2.2.4_New_Features_and_Changes
@Mr.:
If I could politely ask: is the firewall rules log mess, that has existed ever since 2.0, finally fixed?
As in descriptions don't match the actual rules, and the non descriptions, only (@540645064) kind of descriptions, making the FW log utterly useless?
That general issue has been fixed with static tracking IDs in all 2.2.x versions. Every pre-2.2x version (not since 2.0, every release ever) used pf's rule numbers, which may change every time you make a ruleset change.
-
Now coming tomorrow. Noticed fixing a mobile IPsec rightid problem made it impossible to configure many EAP situations. That's fixed.
https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/9a2bec12621c8feaaddd781a89915267659496d2
https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/5e11c6a176d70f1caa987e64a01a8f996b18aad7and documentation updated to reflect the correct config.
https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/IKEv2_with_EAP-MSCHAPv2Release rebuilt, going through test matrix again now. This one should come out after I get up on Sunday.
Those who want to test the latest, gitsync RELENG_2_2 off the most recent snapshot and you'll have the same as we're testing for final release.
-
Limiter - NAT reflection problems are fixed in this release ?
-
Are referring to this? https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/4326
Steve
-
yes … it's work in progress.
Thx
