Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PfBlockerNG v2.0 w/DNSBL

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfBlockerNG
    1.1k Posts 192 Posters 1.9m Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      Panja
      last edited by

      I have installed pfBlockerNG v2.01 on my APU1D4 pfSense 2.2.5

      I'm blocking a few countries for inbound traffic.
      I also setup DNSBL as per post: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=102470.msg572943#msg572943

      I'm using OpenDNS in General Setup and DNS Resolver is enabled with the following options:
      Enable Forwarding Mode (this is needed for my OpenDNS filtering)
      Register DHCP leases in the DNS Resolver
      Register DHCP static mappings in the DNS Resolver

      All is working, ads are being blocked.
      Only problem is when I reboot my box the Unbound Service is not started automatically (or is being stopped).
      So with every reboot I do, I have to manually start the Unbound Service.

      What could be the problem?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • H
        hda
        last edited by

        @Panja:

        …
        So with every reboot I do, I have to manually start the Unbound Service.

        What could be the problem?

        You lost the pfb_dnsbl.conf, in Unbound(Advanced) conf, due to /var in RAM ?
        Delete that line and do a pfB Force Update.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          Panja
          last edited by

          Nope… The line was there:
          server:include: /var/unbound/pfb_dnsbl.conf

          But I removed it, did a force update and rebooted.
          Same problem.
          Unbound is stopped when the reboot is done.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • BBcan177B
            BBcan177 Moderator
            last edited by

            Try to set the Resolver without the two DHCP registration checkboxs enabled… See the first post in this thread :)

            "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

            Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
            Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
            Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P
              Panja
              last edited by

              I have read that post. :)

              Disable the two "DHCP registrations" checkboxes, unless you really require those options.

              I really require those, thats the reason I left them checked…  8)
              Will uncheck them and check if it fixes things for me.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P
                Panja
                last edited by

                It indeed works now.  ;D
                I will leave the two checkboxes unchecked and live without them.

                Btw many thanks for bringing this awesome package to us BBcan177.
                Much appreciated!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A
                  AndrewZ
                  last edited by

                  @BBcan177:

                  This warning indicates that the masterfile is out of sync with the files in the /deny folder. This is a new feature that was added to v2.0 to warn users about this issue. Usually running a 'Force Reload' is sufficient to fix that warning; however, clearing out all the files and starting fresh might be needed in certain conditions. If this is still an issue, please review the pfblockerng.log file for other clues.

                  Re-installed and re-configured from scratch, nothing helps, the warning is still there.
                  No error in the log.
                  /var/db/pfblockerng/deny is empty (I have permit aliases only).

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P
                    Panja
                    last edited by

                    I'm having another problem.
                    All is working on my LAN interface but I have created a WIFI_GUEST interface.
                    On the WIFI_GUEST interface it's not working. Some sites won't load at all.
                    I have checked the floating rule and both interfaces (LAN + WIFI_GUEST) are checked.

                    WIFI_GUEST firewall rules:

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      Jamerson
                      last edited by

                      Thank you so much,
                      any suggestions how to configure this ?
                      on the list of action, have to use disable or deny inbound ?

                      I've configured deny inbound and enabled alexa list but the webserver isn't starting at all
                      pfBlockerNG DNSBL Web Server is not started yet .

                      what I am doing wrong ?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • H
                        Hugovsky
                        last edited by

                        @Panja:

                        I'm having another problem.
                        All is working on my LAN interface but I have created a WIFI_GUEST interface.
                        On the WIFI_GUEST interface it's not working. Some sites won't load at all.
                        I have checked the floating rule and both interfaces (LAN + WIFI_GUEST) are checked.

                        WIFI_GUEST firewall rules:

                        You need a rule interface WIFI_GUEST interface source WIFI_GUEST net destination 127.0.0.1ports 8081 8443 so dnsbl can work.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • T
                          trinidadrancheria
                          last edited by

                          Does this only work with lists, or will it work with live dnsbl queries?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • D
                            doktornotor Banned
                            last edited by

                            @trinidadrancheria:

                            will it work with live dnsbl queries?

                            No.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • H
                              ha11oga11o
                              last edited by

                              Dear BBcan177 i just want to express my huge gratitude to you incorporating DNSBL. Im using it for couple of days so far. It is insane how god is behave on my network. It is really insane how good it is. It simply work and it blocks so much garbage that is almost impossible to believe.

                              THANK YOU!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • J
                                Jamerson
                                last edited by

                                cant get it to work,
                                the service is not starting." pfBlockerNG DNSBL Web Server "

                                rebooted the box, remove the package , reinstall it, no vail

                                please advise

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • P
                                  Panja
                                  last edited by

                                  @Hugovsky:

                                  You need a rule interface WIFI_GUEST interface source WIFI_GUEST net destination 127.0.0.1ports 8081 8443 so dnsbl can work.

                                  Thanks! It's working now. Created an alias for port 8081 + 8443 and added it to a rule to allow to 127.0.0.1
                                  It was the "Block access to firewall" rule that prevented it to work, right?

                                  This is the setup now, which is working. :)

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • D
                                    doktornotor Banned
                                    last edited by

                                    I think you guys are missing this (on the DNSBL tab) with multiple LANs:

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • P
                                      Panja
                                      last edited by

                                      Nope, did not miss that.
                                      As I stated here: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=102470.msg574241#msg574241
                                      I have checked the floating rule and both interfaces (LAN + WIFI_GUEST) are checked.

                                      So I checked both interfaces (LAN + WIFI_GUEST) on the DNSBL tab.
                                      And after that I went to the floating rule and both interfaces were marked in that rule.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • D
                                        doktornotor Banned
                                        last edited by

                                        @Panja:

                                        Nope, did not miss that.
                                        As I stated here: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=102470.msg574241#msg574241
                                        I have checked the floating rule and both interfaces (LAN + WIFI_GUEST) are checked.

                                        Have hard time seeing how's that screenshot showing anything floating.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • P
                                          Panja
                                          last edited by

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • D
                                            doktornotor Banned
                                            last edited by

                                            Yes, so that works, apparently. That "Block access to firewall" ain't doing any good there, clearly.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.