• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

PfBlockerNG v2.0 w/DNSBL

pfBlockerNG
192
1.1k
1.6m
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B
    Bummer
    last edited by Dec 8, 2015, 4:01 PM

    Thanks for the replyl Hugovsky. But I'm still confused.

    My mail server is inside my network and is clean. It would seem to me you'd want to block what is coming in from the outside to the ports opened on the mail server, etc.

    Sorry, I can be dense at times.

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • H
      Hugovsky
      last edited by Dec 8, 2015, 5:37 PM

      Best way to do that is to make an alias and use it with the nat rule that forwards to your server. Remember: the firewall is already blocking everything you don't allow.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • B
        BBcan177 Moderator
        last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 2:07 AM

        @Jamerson:

        @f34rinc:

        @Jamerson:

        can those be blocked using DNSBL ?

        Yes it can

        just post them on the block domain DNS feed ?

        You can add domains to the custom list at the bottom of any Alias, or create a new alias.

        "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

        Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
        Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
        Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • B
          BBcan177 Moderator
          last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 2:09 AM

          @RonpfS:

          I added Unbound under Service Watchdog and unbound start within 5 min of bootup.

          Don't use Service Watchdog with DNSBL as that will interfere with how DNSBL updates.

          "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

          Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
          Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
          Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • R
            RonpfS
            last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 4:59 AM Dec 9, 2015, 4:47 AM

            I tried to find out why unbound dies silently on bootup

            I did a fresh install, disabling all package before saving the config, bring the config back, normal pkg installation went smoothly.

            I enabled all packages except pfBlockerNG and DNSBL , rebooted 2-3 times and unbound is present on reboot.

            I enabled pfBlockerNG, DNSBL, on first reboot unbound was alive
            After 2-3 reboot it kept dying on reboot.
            Watching the services status, I could see it running until DNSBL start, then it dies.
            I went thru the /var/log files, no error is logged !

            Once it is started it keeps running fine.

            So I only put unbound in Service Watchdog, not DNSBL, is this ok?
            Now unbound restart 1 or 2 minutes after it dies.

            2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
            Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
            Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B
              BBcan177 Moderator
              last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 5:00 AM Dec 9, 2015, 4:50 AM

              No don't use Service Watchguard for either.

              Do you have any of the Unbound DHCP registration checkboxes enabled? If so, disable those.

              "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

              Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
              Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
              Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R
                RonpfS
                last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 5:00 AM

                @BBcan177:

                No don't use Service Watchguard for either.

                So how do I find out what's making it dies on reboot ?

                2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
                Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • R
                  RonpfS
                  last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 5:07 AM

                  @BBcan177:

                  Do you have any of the Unbound DHCP registration checkboxes enabled? If so, disable those.

                  Nope only Enable DNSSEC Support is ticked.
                  Network interface is set to ALL
                  Outgoing interface is set to WAN

                  I do have Host Overrides for a local domain (not the local domain of pfense), including the WAN IP of the firewal (it is behind my present pfsense box)

                  2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                  Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
                  Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • B
                    BBcan177 Moderator
                    last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 5:13 AM

                    Increase the Unbound log verbosity and see if it shows any further details.

                    "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                    Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                    Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                    Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R
                      RonpfS
                      last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 6:09 AM Dec 9, 2015, 5:36 AM

                      @BBcan177:

                      Increase the Unbound log verbosity and see if it shows any further details.

                      Increased to level 2 first reboot unbound is running
                      2nd reboot, unbound is not running nothing in the resolver.log for this reboot, only things from last session.
                      Nothing in system.log nor dmesg.boot

                      Remove all hosts overrides, set level to 5

                      resolver logs

                      
                      Dec 9 01:04:46 	unbound: [15366:0] debug: ignoring duplicate RR: mobile.Banzai.it 60 IN A 10.10.10.1
                      Dec 9 01:04:31 	unbound: [15366:0] info: implicit transparent local-zone . TYPE0 IN
                      Dec 9 01:04:22 	unbound: [15366:0] debug: drop user privileges, run as unbound
                      Dec 9 01:04:22 	unbound: [15366:0] debug: chroot to /var/unbound
                      Dec 9 01:04:22 	unbound: [15366:0] debug: chdir to /var/unbound
                      Dec 9 01:04:22 	unbound: [14799:0] debug: setup SSL certificates
                      Dec 9 01:01:52 	unbound: [60328:0] info: send_udp over interface: 127.0.0.1
                      
                      

                      System logs

                      Dec 9 01:04:47 	php: rc.bootup: miniupnpd: Starting service on interface: lan
                      Dec 9 01:04:47 	kernel: done.
                      Dec 9 01:04:47 	php: rc.bootup: Creating rrd update script
                      Dec 9 01:04:42 	kernel: .done.
                      Dec 9 01:04:36 	check_reload_status: Updating all dyndns
                      Dec 9 01:04:36 	kernel: done.
                      Dec 9 01:04:36 	kernel: done.
                      Dec 9 01:04:36 	php: rc.bootup: The command '/usr/local/sbin/unbound -c /var/unbound/unbound.conf' returned exit code '1', the output was '[1449641076] unbound[30851:0] debug: creating udp6 socket :: 53 [1449641076] unbound[30851:0] error: bind: address already in use [1449641076] unbound[30851:0] fatal error: could not open ports'
                      Dec 9 01:04:33 	kernel: done.
                      Dec 9 01:04:33 	php: rc.bootup: ROUTING: setting default route to 172.25.0.254
                      Dec 9 01:04:33 	lighttpd[28666]: (log.c.194) server started
                      Dec 9 01:04:32 	kernel: done.
                      Dec 9 01:04:31 	kernel: done.
                      Dec 9 01:04:29 	kernel: .done.
                      Dec 9 01:04:23 	kernel: ...
                      Dec 9 01:04:22 	kernel: pflog0: promiscuous mode enabled
                      Dec 9 01:04:22 	kernel: done.
                      Dec 9 01:04:22 	php: rc.bootup: Resyncing OpenVPN instances.
                      Dec 9 01:04:22 	php-fpm[245]: /rc.newwanip: rc.newwanip: Info: starting on sk0.
                      Dec 9 01:04:22 	check_reload_status: Linkup starting re0
                      Dec 9 01:04:22 	kernel: re0: link state changed to UP
                      Dec 9 01:04:22 	kernel:
                      Dec 9 01:04:20 	kernel: re0: link state changed to DOWN
                      Dec 9 01:04:20 	check_reload_status: Linkup starting re0
                      Dec 9 01:04:20 	php: rc.bootup: Accept router advertisements on interface sk0
                      Dec 9 01:04:20 	check_reload_status: rc.newwanip starting sk0
                      Dec 9 01:04:19 	kernel: sk0: link state changed to UP
                      Dec 9 01:04:19 	kernel:
                      Dec 9 01:04:19 	check_reload_status: Linkup starting sk0
                      Dec 9 01:04:17 	check_reload_status: Linkup starting sk0
                      
                      

                      2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                      Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
                      Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B
                        BBcan177 Moderator
                        last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 6:31 AM

                        Here is the error:

                        Dec 9 01:04:36 php: rc.bootup: The command '/usr/local/sbin/unbound -c /var/unbound/unbound.conf' returned exit code '1', the output was '[1449641076] unbound[30851:0] debug: creating udp6 socket :: 53 [1449641076] unbound[30851:0] error: bind: address already in use [1449641076] unbound[30851:0] fatal error: could not open ports'

                        Looks like it tried to start Unbound but it was already started as the port was opened already… Don't really have any other help to offer at this moment... Keep an eye on the logs and see if something else comes up...

                        "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                        Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                        Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                        Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • R
                          RonpfS
                          last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 8:24 AM Dec 9, 2015, 6:46 AM

                          It always start the Resolver twice even on a fresh install with no package installed.

                          I tried to open the /var/unbound/pfb_dnsbl.conf 58.9MB in the pfblocker logs tab and it only say Loading file…. nothing appears.

                          Trying to open it with File Manager gives me :

                          Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 134217728 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 123487193 bytes) in /usr/local/www/packages/filemgr/file_manager.php on line 411 
                          

                          I can download it and nothing seems abnormal.

                          I got this crash report :

                          Crash report begins.  Anonymous machine information:
                          
                          i386
                          10.1-RELEASE-p24
                          FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p24 #0 f27a67c(releng/10.1)-dirty: Wed Nov  4 16:13:40 CST 2015     root@pfs22-i386-builder:/usr/obj.RELENG_2_2.i386/usr/pfSensesrc/src.RELENG_2_2/sys/pfSense_SMP.10
                          
                          Crash report details:
                          
                          PHP Errors:
                          [09-Dec-2015 01:27:54 America/New_York] PHP Fatal error:  Allowed memory size of 134217728 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 82324797 bytes) in /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_log.php on line 200
                          [09-Dec-2015 01:39:21 America/New_York] PHP Fatal error:  Allowed memory size of 134217728 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 82324797 bytes) in /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_log.php on line 200
                          [09-Dec-2015 01:40:20 America/New_York] PHP Fatal error:  Allowed memory size of 134217728 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 82324797 bytes) in /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_log.php on line 200
                          [09-Dec-2015 01:40:38 America/New_York] PHP Fatal error:  Allowed memory size of 134217728 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 123487193 bytes) in /usr/local/www/packages/filemgr/file_manager.php on line 411
                          
                          Filename: /var/crash/minfree
                          2048
                          
                          

                          It is a 2GB P4 Prescott …

                          In the pfBlocker/Log browser there is no dnsbl.log or error.log
                          In /var/log/pfblockerng/ there is a file dnsbl_error.log , doesn't tell much.

                          Is-it possible to revert to version 2.0.1 ? Didn't had that issue on a much slower laptop with 2.0.1.

                          2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                          Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
                          Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            Soloam
                            last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 4:50 PM

                            I have found some false positives in the iblocklist lists, for example if you preform a dns lookup to "fractal-design.com" (case builder) it would return 62.116.130.8 that if you search https://www.iblocklist.com/search?string=62.116.130.8 if gives a lot of lists (Malicious, Tracking, etc) can it be outdated?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • D
                              doktornotor Banned
                              last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 4:57 PM

                              @soloam:

                              I have found some false positives in the iblocklist lists, for example if you preform a dns lookup to "fractal-design.com" (case builder) it would return 62.116.130.8 that if you search https://www.iblocklist.com/search?string=62.116.130.8 if gives a lot of lists (Malicious, Tracking, etc) can it be outdated?

                              FPs need to be reported to whomever maintains the blocklist. Or just stop using iBlock lists altogether.

                              I found idiocy like eicar.org on multiple "malware" blocklists. Sigh. Also, people will happily add entire CDN servers (Amazon, etc.) there. Some people just should get out of the blocklist business, stupidity everywhere.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                Soloam
                                last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 5:21 PM

                                I've been getting a lot of false positives in iblock lists, they seemed like a good blacklist provider. What lists are people using in IP and Hosts?

                                Thank You all

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • B
                                  BBcan177 Moderator
                                  last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 10:48 PM

                                  @BBcan177:

                                  Here is the error:

                                  Dec 9 01:04:36 php: rc.bootup: The command '/usr/local/sbin/unbound -c /var/unbound/unbound.conf' returned exit code '1', the output was '[1449641076] unbound[30851:0] debug: creating udp6 socket :: 53 [1449641076] unbound[30851:0] error: bind: address already in use [1449641076] unbound[30851:0] fatal error: could not open ports'

                                  Maybe it has something to do with IPv6? as the error has a udp6 socket shown.

                                  "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                                  Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                                  Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                                  Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • R
                                    RonpfS
                                    last edited by Dec 9, 2015, 11:32 PM

                                    @BBcan177:

                                    @BBcan177:

                                    Here is the error:

                                    Dec 9 01:04:36 php: rc.bootup: The command '/usr/local/sbin/unbound -c /var/unbound/unbound.conf' returned exit code '1', the output was '[1449641076] unbound[30851:0] debug: creating udp6 socket :: 53 [1449641076] unbound[30851:0] error: bind: address already in use [1449641076] unbound[30851:0] fatal error: could not open ports'

                                    Maybe it has something to do with IPv6? as the error has a udp6 socket shown.

                                    I changed the LAN IPv6 Configuration Type from Track Interface to none
                                    that solved the unbound crashing  ;D

                                    As the WAN DHCP didn't provide DHCP6 IP, the LAN IPv6 ip was:

                                    IPv6 Link Local fe80::1:1

                                    this is probably better not to assign LAN IPV6 ip.

                                    now I get :
                                    IPv6 Link Local fe80::1e7e:e5ff:fe1f:fad5

                                    Thanks for opening my noob eyes  ;)

                                    2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                                    Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
                                    Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • B
                                      BBcan177 Moderator
                                      last edited by Dec 11, 2015, 12:36 AM

                                      pfBlockerNG (Bootstrap conversion) has been submitted to the devs.

                                      https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/pull/24

                                      If you guys get a chance, I would recommend testing out the latest pfSense v2.3 snapshot as its expected to go Beta soon along with the packages….

                                      2.3 Testing feedback here:
                                      https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?board=65.0

                                      "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                                      Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                                      Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                                      Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • J
                                        Jamerson
                                        last edited by Dec 11, 2015, 8:50 PM

                                        on the DNSBL FEEDS , below on the page have Custom Block List,
                                        I've added some domains there but I can still access them even they are on the block list .
                                        how is this possible ?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • B
                                          BBcan177 Moderator
                                          last edited by Dec 11, 2015, 9:48 PM

                                          @Jamerson:

                                          on the DNSBL FEEDS , below on the page have Custom Block List,
                                          I've added some domains there but I can still access them even they are on the block list .
                                          how is this possible ?

                                          When you add to an existing custom list, you need to select the "Update custom list" setting at the bottom of the page. Otherwise the list is only updated as per the Alias frequency setting.

                                          "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                                          Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                                          Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                                          Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          211 out of 1077
                                          • First post
                                            211/1077
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.