Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Multi-WAN with squid3 proxy server

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cache/Proxy
    14 Posts 4 Posters 3.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K
      kevindd992002
      last edited by

      Sure, thanks. I'll wait for your reply.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • K
        kevindd992002
        last edited by

        Do we have anything on this?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          kevindd992002
          last edited by

          BUMP!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • KOMK
            KOM
            last edited by

            From what I know, squid will always use the default gateway in a multi-WAN config no matter what you do.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • K
              kevindd992002
              last edited by

              @KOM:

              From what I know, squid will always use the default gateway in a multi-WAN config no matter what you do.

              By default, yes. But there were "fixes" for this on the past versions of pfsense. These don't work on the latest version though and I don't really understand how they work (which is why I decided to make my own thread).

              If you think of it though, localhost services should have a way to use the multiwan gateway. Pfsense itself, when downloading a firmware update, only uses the default gateway by default.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • K
                kevindd992002
                last edited by

                Anybody please?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • K
                  kevindd992002
                  last edited by

                  Please help? Anyone? Is this not a valid question?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • KOMK
                    KOM
                    last edited by

                    If nobody has responded then it usually means that nobody knows.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R
                      reinaldo.gomes
                      last edited by

                      Have you ever tried the floating rules? There you can target the firewall itself as the source. I haven't tried this yet, but soon I'll have to.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • K
                        kevindd992002
                        last edited by

                        @reinaldo.gomes:

                        Have you ever tried the floating rules? There you can target the firewall itself as the source. I haven't tried this yet, but soon I'll have to.

                        Yes I did. If you've read post # 2 of this thread, the details of the rule I've made are there.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.