Dipnger logging with multiple gateways
-
when theres multiple gateways logs don't indicate problem gateway
Dec 14 14:57:40 dpinger Clear: latency 24576us loss 4%
Dec 14 14:57:16 dpinger Alarm: latency 25834us loss 22%is it possible to have dpinger monitor more than one ip/gateway ??
-
I noticed that re: logging as I was testing various scenarios with dpinger today, that could make troubleshooting a real PITA. We'll get some kind of identifier there.
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/5645For 2.3(.0 at least), you'll still be limited to a single monitor IP. Use IPs that are anycasted so should always reply reliably, like Google DNS, 4.2.2.2, 4.2.2.1, OpenDNS, etc. and you should be fine.
-
Just as a side note (won't go OT), AFAIK you shouldn't use 4.2.2.x as DNS/Ping checks if you don't have a connection to Level3. Their old DNS Anycast Servers 4.2.2.1-6 are serving, allright, but other than Googles public DNS they were never meant for public usage and they discourage use of it. (http://www.tummy.com/articles/famous-dns-server/)
Also at some point they were intercepting wrong/failing dns calls and redirecting. -
@cmb:
I noticed that re: logging as I was testing various scenarios with dpinger today, that could make troubleshooting a real PITA. We'll get some kind of identifier there.
https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/5645For 2.3(.0 at least), you'll still be limited to a single monitor IP. Use IPs that are anycasted so should always reply reliably, like Google DNS, 4.2.2.2, 4.2.2.1, OpenDNS, etc. and you should be fine.
just needs integration now.
https://github.com/dennypage/dpinger/commit/bfed5112c2060071e39417a2a3db3b1824aa6b15
-
Dpinger was updated a couple days ago to include the target information in syslog entries. And again today to introduce a arbitrary identifier. Either will address this issue. It just takes a bit of time for the changes to flow through.
when theres multiple gateways logs don't indicate problem gateway
Dec 14 14:57:40 dpinger Clear: latency 24576us loss 4%
Dec 14 14:57:16 dpinger Alarm: latency 25834us loss 22% -
Just as a side note (won't go OT), AFAIK you shouldn't use 4.2.2.x as DNS/Ping checks if you don't have a connection to Level3. Their old DNS Anycast Servers 4.2.2.1-6 are serving, allright, but other than Googles public DNS they were never meant for public usage and they discourage use of it. (http://www.tummy.com/articles/famous-dns-server/)
Also at some point they were intercepting wrong/failing dns calls and redirecting.What if your ISP uses Level 3? 8)
tracert 4.2.2.2
Tracing route to b.resolvers.Level3.net [4.2.2.2]
over a maximum of 30 hops:1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms pfsense.localdomain [192.168.1.1]
2 2 ms 2 ms 1 ms xxx
3 15 ms 14 ms 14 ms xe-10-0-0.bar2.Minneapolis2.Level3.net [4.59.66.5]
4 * * * Request timed out.
5 15 ms 15 ms 14 ms b.resolvers.Level3.net [4.2.2.2]