Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Ipsec ikev2

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.3-RC Snapshot Feedback and Issues - ARCHIVED
    13 Posts 2 Posters 3.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M
      maverick_slo
      last edited by

      Hmmm.
      Ipv4 tunnel works for me, but Ipv6 does not.
      Rules are added, ipsec was restarted. Tracert shows traffic to go to pfsense and then it stops.

      ? :)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        maverick_slo
        last edited by

        Hmmm just found this on 2.2.6 box:
        kernel: ip6_output (ipsec): error code 47

        This error does not appear on 2.3

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jimpJ
          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
          last edited by

          Not sure, lots of other places your setup could have gone wrong with IPv6. All I know is that it works here when I tried it last. P2 established and traffic v6 was passing over the tunnel, so it's not likely to be a general IPv6+IPsec problem, but something more specific to your local network settings.

          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

          Do not Chat/PM for help!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            maverick_slo
            last edited by

            I know it`s old but still:
            https://www.google.si/?gws_rd=ssl#q=kernel:+ip6_output+%28ipsec%29:+error+code+47

            BTW my IPv6 is configured just fine :)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M
              maverick_slo
              last edited by

              And this: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2013-February/034653.html
              If I create IPv6 tunnel it works just fine, like IPv4…

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jimpJ
                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                last edited by

                Not sure what to tell you other than to double check your work. It works fine here with IPv4 and IPv6 in a single IKEv2 tunnel:

                [2.3-BETA][root@jack.dw.example.com]/root: ping -c 4 -S 192.168.43.1 10.7.0.1
                PING 10.7.0.1 (10.7.0.1) from 192.168.43.1: 56 data bytes
                64 bytes from 10.7.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.855 ms
                64 bytes from 10.7.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.585 ms
                64 bytes from 10.7.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.673 ms
                64 bytes from 10.7.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.861 ms
                
                --- 10.7.0.1 ping statistics ---
                4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
                round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.585/0.744/0.861/0.119 ms
                [2.3-BETA][root@jack.dw.example.com]/root: ping6 -c 4 -S 2001:db8:1:eec0:20d:b9ff:fe33:f72 2001:db8:1:deb0::1
                PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2001:db8:1:eec0:20d:b9ff:fe33:f72 --> 2001:db8:1:deb0::1
                16 bytes from 2001:db8:1:deb0::1, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=1.439 ms
                16 bytes from 2001:db8:1:deb0::1, icmp_seq=1 hlim=64 time=0.943 ms
                16 bytes from 2001:db8:1:deb0::1, icmp_seq=2 hlim=64 time=0.956 ms
                16 bytes from 2001:db8:1:deb0::1, icmp_seq=3 hlim=64 time=0.839 ms
                
                --- 2001:db8:1:deb0::1 ping6 statistics ---
                4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
                round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 0.839/1.044/1.439/0.232 ms
                
                
                : tcpdump -vvvni enc0 
                tcpdump: WARNING: enc0: no IPv4 address assigned
                tcpdump: listening on enc0, link-type ENC (OpenBSD encapsulated IP), capture size 65535 bytes
                15:58:55.496876 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc0dbd04f: IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 45404, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
                    192.168.43.1 > 10.7.0.1: ICMP echo request, id 16664, seq 0, length 64
                15:58:55.496993 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc205845b: IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 63546, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 84, bad cksum d39b (->8cbd)!)
                    10.7.0.1 > 192.168.43.1: ICMP echo reply, id 16664, seq 0, length 64
                15:58:56.498392 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc0dbd04f: IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 38240, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
                    192.168.43.1 > 10.7.0.1: ICMP echo request, id 16664, seq 1, length 64
                15:58:56.498436 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc205845b: IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 38618, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 84, bad cksum ef97 (->ee1d)!)
                    10.7.0.1 > 192.168.43.1: ICMP echo reply, id 16664, seq 1, length 64
                15:58:57.557724 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc0dbd04f: IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 28035, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
                    192.168.43.1 > 10.7.0.1: ICMP echo request, id 16664, seq 2, length 64
                15:58:57.557766 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc205845b: IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 41042, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 84, bad cksum 1775 (->e4a5)!)
                    10.7.0.1 > 192.168.43.1: ICMP echo reply, id 16664, seq 2, length 64
                15:58:58.563872 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc0dbd04f: IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 43514, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 84)
                    192.168.43.1 > 10.7.0.1: ICMP echo request, id 16664, seq 3, length 64
                15:58:58.563914 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc205845b: IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 32701, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 84, bad cksum dafd (->53b)!)
                    10.7.0.1 > 192.168.43.1: ICMP echo reply, id 16664, seq 3, length 64
                15:59:01.897952 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc0dbd04f: IP6 (hlim 64, next-header ICMPv6 (58) payload length: 16) 2001:db8:1:eec0:20d:b9ff:fe33:f72 > 2001:db8:1:deb0::1: [icmp6 sum ok] ICMP6, echo request, seq 0
                15:59:01.898052 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc205845b: IP6 (hlim 64, next-header ICMPv6 (58) payload length: 16) 2001:db8:1:deb0::1 > 2001:db8:1:eec0:20d:b9ff:fe33:f72: [icmp6 sum ok] ICMP6, echo reply, seq 0
                15:59:02.960706 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc0dbd04f: IP6 (hlim 64, next-header ICMPv6 (58) payload length: 16) 2001:db8:1:eec0:20d:b9ff:fe33:f72 > 2001:db8:1:deb0::1: [icmp6 sum ok] ICMP6, echo request, seq 1
                15:59:02.960760 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc205845b: IP6 (hlim 64, next-header ICMPv6 (58) payload length: 16) 2001:db8:1:deb0::1 > 2001:db8:1:eec0:20d:b9ff:fe33:f72: [icmp6 sum ok] ICMP6, echo reply, seq 1
                15:59:04.014537 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc0dbd04f: IP6 (hlim 64, next-header ICMPv6 (58) payload length: 16) 2001:db8:1:eec0:20d:b9ff:fe33:f72 > 2001:db8:1:deb0::1: [icmp6 sum ok] ICMP6, echo request, seq 2
                15:59:04.014589 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc205845b: IP6 (hlim 64, next-header ICMPv6 (58) payload length: 16) 2001:db8:1:deb0::1 > 2001:db8:1:eec0:20d:b9ff:fe33:f72: [icmp6 sum ok] ICMP6, echo reply, seq 2
                15:59:05.032436 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc0dbd04f: IP6 (hlim 64, next-header ICMPv6 (58) payload length: 16) 2001:db8:1:eec0:20d:b9ff:fe33:f72 > 2001:db8:1:deb0::1: [icmp6 sum ok] ICMP6, echo request, seq 3
                15:59:05.032501 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xc205845b: IP6 (hlim 64, next-header ICMPv6 (58) payload length: 16) 2001:db8:1:deb0::1 > 2001:db8:1:eec0:20d:b9ff:fe33:f72: [icmp6 sum ok] ICMP6, echo reply, seq 3
                
                

                And from "ipsec statusall" for good measure…

                Connections:
                   bypasslan:  %any...%any  IKEv1/2
                   bypasslan:   local:  uses public key authentication
                   bypasslan:   remote: uses public key authentication
                   bypasslan:   child:  192.168.43.0/24|/0 === 192.168.43.0/24|/0 PASS
                        con1:  198.51.100.100...198.51.100.7  IKEv2, dpddelay=10s
                        con1:   local:  [198.51.100.100] uses pre-shared key authentication
                        con1:   remote: [198.51.100.7] uses pre-shared key authentication
                        con1:   child:  192.168.43.0/24|/0 2001:db8:1:eec0::/60|/0 === 10.7.0.0/24|/0 2001:db8:1:deb0::/64|/0 TUNNEL, dpdaction=restart
                Shunted Connections:
                   bypasslan:  192.168.43.0/24|/0 === 192.168.43.0/24|/0 PASS
                Routed Connections:
                        con1{3}:  ROUTED, TUNNEL, reqid 1
                        con1{3}:   192.168.43.0/24|/0 2001:db8:1:eec0::/60|/0 === 10.7.0.0/24|/0 2001:db8:1:deb0::/64|/0
                Security Associations (1 up, 0 connecting):
                        con1[1]: ESTABLISHED 5 minutes ago, 198.51.100.100[198.51.100.100]...198.51.100.7[198.51.100.7]
                        con1[1]: IKEv2 SPIs: 77b4381031502095_i* 53b145c57a3f7c63_r, pre-shared key reauthentication in 7 hours
                        con1[1]: IKE proposal: AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96/PRF_HMAC_SHA1/MODP_1024
                        con1{2}:  INSTALLED, TUNNEL, reqid 1, ESP SPIs: c205845b_i c0dbd04f_o
                        con1{2}:  AES_CBC_256/HMAC_SHA1_96, 1456 bytes_i, 3680 bytes_o, rekeying in 39 minutes
                        con1{2}:   192.168.43.0/24|/0 === 2001:db8:1:deb0::/64|/0
                
                

                (granted that output looks a little funny, but it is there and working)

                 setkey -DP
                192.168.43.0/24[any] 192.168.43.0/24[any] any
                	in none
                	created: Feb  1 15:58:32 2016  lastused: Feb  1 15:58:32 2016
                	lifetime: 9223372036854775807(s) validtime: 0(s)
                	spid=8 seq=5 pid=93603
                	refcnt=1
                10.7.0.0/24[any] 192.168.43.0/24[any] any
                	in ipsec
                	esp/tunnel/198.51.100.7-198.51.100.100/unique:1
                	created: Feb  1 15:58:32 2016  lastused: Feb  1 15:58:58 2016
                	lifetime: 9223372036854775807(s) validtime: 0(s)
                	spid=10 seq=4 pid=93603
                	refcnt=1
                2001:db8:1:deb0::/64[any] 2001:db8:1:eec0::/60[any] any
                	in ipsec
                	esp/tunnel/198.51.100.7-198.51.100.100/unique:1
                	created: Feb  1 15:58:32 2016  lastused: Feb  1 15:59:05 2016
                	lifetime: 9223372036854775807(s) validtime: 0(s)
                	spid=12 seq=3 pid=93603
                	refcnt=1
                192.168.43.0/24[any] 192.168.43.0/24[any] any
                	out none
                	created: Feb  1 15:58:32 2016  lastused: Feb  1 15:58:32 2016
                	lifetime: 9223372036854775807(s) validtime: 0(s)
                	spid=7 seq=2 pid=93603
                	refcnt=1
                192.168.43.0/24[any] 10.7.0.0/24[any] any
                	out ipsec
                	esp/tunnel/198.51.100.100-198.51.100.7/unique:1
                	created: Feb  1 15:58:32 2016  lastused: Feb  1 15:58:58 2016
                	lifetime: 9223372036854775807(s) validtime: 0(s)
                	spid=9 seq=1 pid=93603
                	refcnt=1
                2001:db8:1:eec0::/60[any] 2001:db8:1:deb0::/64[any] any
                	out ipsec
                	esp/tunnel/198.51.100.100-198.51.100.7/unique:1
                	created: Feb  1 15:58:32 2016  lastused: Feb  1 15:59:05 2016
                	lifetime: 9223372036854775807(s) validtime: 0(s)
                	spid=11 seq=0 pid=93603
                	refcnt=1
                
                

                Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  maverick_slo
                  last edited by

                  Hmmmm… OK
                  Do you have any recommendations where to start looking?
                  I added firewall rules on IPSEC interfaces on both sides and set them to allow any any IPv6 for test purposes.
                  I do not block IPv6 anywhere.

                  Wireshark shows this on local ipsec iface when I ping:

                  
                  22:07:05.969317 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xce682ffa: (hlim 127, next-header ICMPv6 (58) payload length: 40) 2001:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX > 2a01:XXX:XXXX:XXXX::XXX: [icmp6 sum ok] ICMP6, echo request, seq 45
                  22:07:10.676559 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xce682ffa: (hlim 127, next-header ICMPv6 (58) payload length: 40) 2001:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX > 2a01:XXX:XXXX:XXXX::XXX: [icmp6 sum ok] ICMP6, echo request, seq 46
                  22:07:15.675531 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0xce682ffa: (hlim 127, next-header ICMPv6 (58) payload length: 40) 2001:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX:XXXX > 2a01:XXX:XXXX:XXXX::XXX: [icmp6 sum ok] ICMP6, echo request, seq 47
                  
                  

                  And each ping from 2.3 network to 2.2.6 network produces above (kernel: ip6_output (ipsec): error code 47) error on 2.2.6 system.
                  So traffic comes to 2.2.6 and there it stops or something ?

                  Thanks!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jimpJ
                    jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                    last edited by

                    Not sure there. I had that same tunnel I showed above working between 2.2.5 and 2.3 before upgrading the older system to 2.3. I don't have an active one that goes between 2.2.6 and 2.3 to test at the moment. I tested both because for a while we prevented both from being configured. I made sure it worked before relaxing the input validation.

                    https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/5305
                    https://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/2.2.5_New_Features_and_Changes#IPsec

                    Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                    Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                    Do not Chat/PM for help!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M
                      maverick_slo
                      last edited by

                      As I suspected there is a problem with 2.2.6 and IKEv2 P2.

                      It does not work, at least 32-bit is not working with ipv4 and ipv6 both inside one P1.

                      I upgraded 2.2.6 to 2.3 and IPv6 tunnel inside IPv4 P1 is working just fine.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • jimpJ
                        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                        last edited by

                        It's possible it's specific to 32-bit but I'm not sure how. Either way, if it works on 2.3 there is nothing to fix currently. If we do another 2.2.x release it will only be a security release and wouldn't be used to address something like this.

                        Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                        Do not Chat/PM for help!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M
                          maverick_slo
                          last edited by

                          Yeah, but I cant help myself, I like to know when Im wrong and this time my config checked out just fine :)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.