Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    NEW Monitoring graph

    2.3-RC Snapshot Feedback and Issues - ARCHIVED
    28
    168
    80.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jdillardJ
      jdillard
      last edited by

      @NOYB:

      Yes I know std dev can be greater than the mean.  Because of the graph/table labels it seems to indicate that it is greater than the max.

      So the graph/data table "delay" label is not very accurate.
      Delay is really average delay.  Thus in the data table the min, avg, max, columns actually contain min avg delay, avg avg delay, max avg delay.

      Labeling the std dev row as "stddev of delay" seems to indicate that it is the std dev of the row labeled "delay".  Which would be more accurately labeled "avg of delay".

      So "delay" should be "avg delay" and "stddev of delay" should just be "stddev"?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jdillardJ
        jdillard
        last edited by

        @grandrivers:

        packet loss should be red in color

        manually assigning colors is a bad idea for this use case. Possibly in the future, more specialized charts could get special treatment.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • dennypageD
          dennypage
          last edited by

          I think this would be sufficiently clear.

          @jdillard:

          So "delay" should be "avg delay" and "stddev of delay" should just be "stddev"?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jdillardJ
            jdillard
            last edited by

            @Clown:

            Thanks, Monitoring works now.

            There should be some rounding of the values, see the attached Picture.

            Edit:
            This happens just when the 'Timer period' is greater than 1day.

            Not sure how this never happened to me, but should be fixed next time around.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M
              maverick_slo
              last edited by

              Hi!

              I`m on latest snap.
              See attached image. I have some packet loss (intentionally) and now graph is useless to me.
              Can sth be done in this way?

              I can`t see any useable data from graph…

              graph_new.png
              graph_new.png_thumb

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • N
                NOYB
                last edited by

                @NOYB:

                Could we have more granularity than 5 minutes please?  Especially on the 1 hour graph.
                The RRD has 60 data points an hour but the graph seem to display a granularity of only 12 data points per hour.

                Makes for nice smooth lines that look pretty for consumer class.  Ideally a granularity selector based on the RRD data granularity of the selected graph time period would be nice.

                Thanks.

                Pull request submitted for this:
                https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/pull/73

                See attached image.

                Granularity.jpg
                Granularity.jpg_thumb

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • N
                  NOYB
                  last edited by

                  @dennypage:

                  I think this would be sufficiently clear.

                  @jdillard:

                  So "delay" should be "avg delay" and "stddev of delay" should just be "stddev"?

                  Yes that would differently be better.  Here's another labeling possibility.  What about this:
                  delay average
                  delay std. dev.

                  Just throwing it out there to be considered.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • N
                    NOYB
                    last edited by

                    Bubble values not matching graph.

                    ![Values Not Match Graph.jpg](/public/imported_attachments/1/Values Not Match Graph.jpg)
                    ![Values Not Match Graph.jpg_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Values Not Match Graph.jpg_thumb)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • jdillardJ
                      jdillard
                      last edited by

                      @NOYB:

                      Bubble values not matching graph.

                      Are you on the latest version? I added a few lines to change the rounding location if the number was under .001 (could probably be done more elegantly, I'm working on cleaning some of the SI/rounding stuff up).

                      I'm also checking out your patch, but looks good at first glance.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • N
                        NOYB
                        last edited by

                        To paraphrase Richard Dawson.

                        pkg info says… pfSense-Status_Monitoring-0.6

                        Dashboard says..
                        2.3-BETA (i386)
                        built on Sun Mar 06 08:37:58 CST 2016

                        What is the latest?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • N
                          NOYB
                          last edited by

                          @samoth:

                          Any reason why my graphs wouldn't have any data?  No matter what I pick in settings, I get 0 for values in the graph.

                          Try removing "inpass total" and "outpass total".  That's what works for me.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • N
                            NOYB
                            last edited by

                            @jdillard:

                            @NOYB:

                            Bubble values not matching graph.

                            I added a few lines to change the rounding location if the number was under .001 (could probably be done more elegantly, I'm working on cleaning some of the SI/rounding stuff up).

                            Think the delay and std. dev. values should be converted to milliseconds and for values less than 1 ms to microseconds.  And include the units designation ms or us.

                            @jdillard:

                            I'm also checking out your patch, but looks good at first glance.

                            Thanks.  I like it.  Any idea how to clear the lines/bars of a previous graph so that changing between line and bar doesn't create an overlay?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M
                              maverick_slo
                              last edited by

                              And another awesome thing would be to be able to select values yourself.
                              kbit, mbit etc…

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • jdillardJ
                                jdillard
                                last edited by

                                @NOYB:

                                @samoth:

                                Any reason why my graphs wouldn't have any data?  No matter what I pick in settings, I get 0 for values in the graph.

                                Try removing "inpass total" and "outpass total".  That's what works for me.

                                I am have some sample data to fix this issue. Hope to have a fix by the end of the day.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • jdillardJ
                                  jdillard
                                  last edited by

                                  @NOYB:

                                  Any idea how to clear the lines/bars of a previous graph so that changing between line and bar doesn't create an overlay?

                                  I am thinking the D3 .remove() function and/or feeding it an empty dataset. I'd have to play around with it.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • jdillardJ
                                    jdillard
                                    last edited by

                                    @maverick_slo:

                                    Hi!

                                    I`m on latest snap.
                                    See attached image. I have some packet loss (intentionally) and now graph is useless to me.
                                    Can sth be done in this way?

                                    I can`t see any useable data from graph…

                                    Not sure what sth means in this context. You can click the packet loss line in the legend to hide it so you can see the other lines.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • I
                                      itsme01
                                      last edited by

                                      There is still an issue with the Quality Graphs. If you have packet loss, the entire graph gets unreadable (see image below) as most of the graph is used to show the packet loss rather than the delay. Furthermore, packet loss is also shown strangely in the table below the graph.

                                      ![Screen Shot 2016-03-09 at 12.52.17.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2016-03-09 at 12.52.17.png)
                                      ![Screen Shot 2016-03-09 at 12.52.17.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2016-03-09 at 12.52.17.png_thumb)

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • M
                                        maverick_slo
                                        last edited by

                                        Ummm see reply directly above your post…

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • I
                                          itsme01
                                          last edited by

                                          @maverick_slo:

                                          Ummm see reply directly above your post…

                                          Yes, I know. But just hiding a problem does not solve the problem, if you know what I mean.  :P

                                          I guess a solution to the problem would be to have packet loss on a secondary axis as it is in percent compared to the delay axis which is in ms/us.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Raul RamosR
                                            Raul Ramos
                                            last edited by

                                            A long solution should be a personalized and saved graph with custom name to do a single click and show our graph with respective data.

                                            pfSense:
                                            ASRock -> Wolfdale1333-D667 (2GB TeamElite Ram)
                                            Marvell 88SA8040 Sata to CF(Sandisk 4GB) Controller
                                            NIC's: RTL8100E (Internal ) and Intel® PRO/1000 PT Dual (Intel 82571GB)

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.