PfBlockerNG v2.0 w/DNSBL

Nachtfalke

Hi,

I did not get it work properly with squid and pfblockerng. Squid is running in non-transperent mode and it seems to make problems with the redirect to the :8081 and :8443 ports.
This is probably because the pfblockerNG NAT rules are on the "LAN" interface but the squid initiated traffic is not on LAN but on localhost (127.0.0.1). I don't know exactly how it works and where the problem is.

But what I found out is the reason why squid blocked access to https with port 8443. I had to add port 844 to the squid "ACL SSLPorts" on the ACL tab in squid so that squid accepts https traffic on this port.

So at the moment I would say that pfblockerng is is blocking on http but redirects to pfsense webui and it does not log ist.
For https I did not found a website or ist does not work.

So if anyone has any additional ideas please let me know hot to get squid and pfblockerng working.

BBcan177

@azzaron:

To be completely fair, the interface of DNSBL Configuration does state:

Note: DNSBL will block and partially log Alerts for HTTPS requests. To debug issues…

We did find some of the CNAMES being choked in the squidblacklist.org's Malicious list. This doesn't explain why a blank conf file produced similar results. But, the suppression list works and we move on. :)

Yes I know the text your mentioning but its not really related… DNSBL is not breaking the HTTPS by MITMing the connection. So for HTTPS, the only details that DNSBL can capture is the Event timestamp and the Domain name... All of the other details (Interface and URL etc...) can't be captured currently..

BTW: I have a test box with a CNAME lookup to fix this issue for the next release... so Thanks for bring it to my attention... ;)

BBcan177

@Nachtfalke:

I did not get it work properly with squid and pfblockerng.

So if anyone has any additional ideas please let me know hot to get squid and pfblockerng working.

Hi Nachtfalke,

Sorry but I don't use Squid and can't help much there… There are several people who use both packages so I am surprised that no one is responding to help you out...

There's a great community here and hopefully we can nudge an answer out for you :)

Panja

I have setup DNSBL EasyList but when browsing to YouTube I'm getting an invalid certificate error.
ad.doubleclick.net: root certificate is not trusted.

How can I prevent this?

BBcan177

@Panja:

I have setup DNSBL EasyList but when browsing to YouTube I'm getting an invalid certificate error.
ad.doubleclick.net: root certificate is not trusted.

What browser are you using? Is it up-to-date?

What URL are you using for Youtube that reports that message? Or is this in a Youtube App?

Panja

I tried Safari on OSX and Internet Explorer (11) on Windows 10.
They are up to date.

https://www.youtube.com

See attached image.

![Screen Shot 2016-03-13 at 20.41.26.png_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2016-03-13 at 20.41.26.png_thumb)
![Screen Shot 2016-03-13 at 20.41.26.png](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2016-03-13 at 20.41.26.png)

BBcan177

@Panja:

I tried Safari on OSX and Internet Explorer (11) on Windows 10.

Chrome and FF do not have this issue, as they silently drop those connections to a non-secure site. I suspect over time that Safari and IE (didn't test Edge) will get their act in gear … Not much I can do to fix that issue...

Panja

Edge is having the same issue. But thanks for clearing that out.

That's probably the reason why I didn't notice this problem before.
I've been using Chrome for ages but recently I re-installed my GF's laptop with Win10 and she uses IE.

BBcan177

Recent Malvertising Campaign hits several Top Websites… bbc.com, msn.com, nfl.com, aol.com, answers.com:

https://blog.malwarebytes.org/malvertising-2/2016/03/large-angler-malvertising-campaign-hits-top-publishers/
http://blog.trendmicro.com/trendlabs-security-intelligence/malvertising-campaign-in-us-leads-to-angler-exploit-kitbedep/
https://www.trustwave.com/Resources/SpiderLabs-Blog/Angler-Takes-Malvertising-to-New-Heights/

These malicious domains are not currently listed by the DNSBL blocklists in use.

I have added them to my DNSBL Gist:
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/BBcan177/4a8bf37c131be4803cb2/raw

Ramosel

@BBcan177:

These malicious domains are not currently listed by the DNSBL blocklists in use.

I have added them to my DNSBL Gist:
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/BBcan177/4a8bf37c131be4803cb2/raw

Too cool, thank you!

Rick

varazir

Hello,

Only me who has crash problem on my pfSense?

PHP Errors:
[20-Mar-2016 07:15:00 Europe/Stockholm] PHP Fatal error:  Maximum execution time of 900 seconds exceeded in /usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.inc on line 902

BBcan177

@varazir, are you on the latest version of pfBlockerNG? If not, please update and see if that fixes your issue.

varazir

@BBcan177:

@varazir, are you on the latest version of pfBlockerNG? If not, please update and see if that fixes your issue.

I don't have any newer in the System: Package Manager, 2.0.4

BBcan177

@varazir:

@BBcan177:

@varazir, are you on the latest version of pfBlockerNG? If not, please update and see if that fixes your issue.

I don't have any newer in the System: Package Manager, 2.0.4

Line 902 has code for the Alexa database conversion… If this only happened once, then discard it, but if its happening more often please provide some additional details on your hardware.

Do you see these two files:

ls /var/db/pfblockerng/top*

/var/db/pfblockerng/top-1m.csv

Can you open the top-1m.csv file?

When you run this command, it will show how many Alexa TLDs are being used… The count should match the Alexa count that you defined in the DNSBL tab (Number of Alexa Top Domains to Whitelisting):

wc -l /var/db/pfblockerng/pfbalexawhitelist.txt

You can also review the error.log file, to see if the Alexa Database is failing…

reggie14

@BBcan177:

@Panja:

I tried Safari on OSX and Internet Explorer (11) on Windows 10.

Chrome and FF do not have this issue, as they silently drop those connections to a non-secure site. I suspect over time that Safari and IE (didn't test Edge) will get their act in gear … Not much I can do to fix that issue...

I think you're right- I've never seen a certificate warning when using Edge. Though, I've only done a small amount of testing- Chrome is my usual browser.

varazir

@BBcan177:

@varazir:

@BBcan177:

@varazir, are you on the latest version of pfBlockerNG? If not, please update and see if that fixes your issue.

I don't have any newer in the System: Package Manager, 2.0.4

Line 902 has code for the Alexa database conversion… If this only happened once, then discard it, but if its happening more often please provide some additional details on your hardware.

Do you see these two files:
ls /var/db/pfblockerng/alexa*

/var/db/pfblockerng/alexa-top1m.zip 
/var/db/pfblockerng/alexa_1m
Can you open the alexa_1m file?

When you run this command, it will show how many Alexa TLDs are being used… The count should match the Alexa count that you defined in the DNSBL tab (Number of Alexa Top Domains to Whitelisting):
wc -l /var/db/pfblockerng/alexa_1m
You can also review the error.log file, to see if the Alexa Database is failing…

Can't find the files and I get it several times a day. almost every time I check pfsense I see a crash log.

I'm running it as virtual so

Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz
Current: 388 MHz, Max: 3109 MHz
4 CPUs: 2 package(s) x 2 core(s)

4GB ram

BBcan177

I have posted PR #1243, pfBlockerNG v2.0.5 (for pfSense v2.2.x)
and
I have also posted PR #87, pfBlockerNG v2.0.8 (for pfSense v2.3)

Changelog can be seen in the attached links. If you have any issues, post back in the forum.

I highly recommend installing pfSense 2.3. Its nearing Release Candidate (RC) and is really looking sharp. Its getting harder to maintain pfBlockerNG in two different platforms, so I may concentrate my future efforts in pfSense 2.3. So it will most likely see all of the new upcoming features. I will however maintain pfBlockerNG in 2.2.x that are bug fixes.

Thanks!

beatstick

Can the package be updated from the pfsense gui by clicking reinstall pfblockerng (pfsense 2.2.6)? Will my settings be kept? I can't find a download file on the github page on first look, which is normal, as github seems to make a point of confusing anyone who just wants to find a simple installer ;)

wiz561

@beatstick:

Can the package be updated from the pfsense gui by clicking reinstall pfblockerng (pfsense 2.2.6)? Will my settings be kept? I can't find a download file on the github page on first look, which is normal, as github seems to make a point of confusing anyone who just wants to find a simple installer ;)

Normally, I think packages get upgraded/updated through the package manager. You have to manually update the packages by clicking on the "reinstall the package" button. However, I did this and I'm still on 2.0.4.

Also, my settings didn't get removed, but it's always a good idea to backup the config first.

killmasta93

FOR PEOPLE WITH GIF ISSUES READ THIS

If your running WPAD and have on your navigator to auto detect proxy you WILL get the webGUI of pfSense instead of the GIF but disable the auto detect proxy on the navigator you then will see the GIF…It seems that WPAD overrides everything even when it comes to OpenVPN also...