Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    New Traffic Totals package available for testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Traffic Monitoring
    121 Posts 37 Posters 52.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T
      timotl
      last edited by

      I don't see anything in the interface selection.
      I can click through the blank space and it does follow
      I'm using VLANS on a single LAGG of two physical interfaces.
      The totals do show up for my physical and ovpn interfaces, but none of those are assigned labels.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jdillardJ
        jdillard
        last edited by

        Ok I'll have to look into the code that generates the interface names, I have a feeling it is making the option element, but not populating it with content. Grandrivers, do you happen to know what makes those 2 interfaces that aren't showing up different from the others (based on type, etc)?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • G
          grandrivers
          last edited by

          one is a pppoe WAN  the other is a non assigned opt interface but had not noticed the neither of my HE ipv6 tunnels show up at all might be nice to have those as well

          pfsense plus 25.03 super micro A1SRM-2558F
          C2558 32gig ECC  60gig SSD

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • MikeV7896M
            MikeV7896
            last edited by

            I wonder if there's limits to what vnstat can track usage for… because interfaces that seem to be showing up are physical interfaces, while non-physical ones - VLANs, tunnels, etc. - don't seem to be showing up.

            Also, the interfaces selected show their pfSense names (WAN, LAN, GUEST), but in the graph and table they're identified as the actual physical interface (igb0, igb1, igb2). I also have a blank entry, which is my unassigned igb3 interface. This is part of what leads me to the above suggestion that vnstat may only be able to track physical interfaces.

            The S in IOT stands for Security

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jdillardJ
              jdillard
              last edited by

              Just bumped the version to 0.2. It should include misc fixes as well as fixes for:

              #6) The correct units and axis label. Although, I have to figure out how to make a custom axis format as it uses binary prefixes and not the SI prefixes.

              #7) PHP shouldn't be listed as a dependency anymore. This may take some more kicking to get to work.

              #8) Don't allow TOP 10 when multiple interfaces are selected.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jdillardJ
                jdillard
                last edited by

                @virgiliomi:

                I wonder if there's limits to what vnstat can track usage for… because interfaces that seem to be showing up are physical interfaces, while non-physical ones - VLANs, tunnels, etc. - don't seem to be showing up.

                Also, the interfaces selected show their pfSense names (WAN, LAN, GUEST), but in the graph and table they're identified as the actual physical interface (igb0, igb1, igb2). I also have a blank entry, which is my unassigned igb3 interface. This is part of what leads me to the above suggestion that vnstat may only be able to track physical interfaces.

                It could also have to do with the get_interface_list() function I am using. I might need to use a different function or a combination of them, I am in the process of testing get_configured_interface_with_descr().

                Edit: Bad news bears, this is what the vnStat man page says:

                Virtual and aliased interfaces cannot be monitored because the kernel doesn't provide traffic information for that type of interfaces. Such interfaces are usually named eth0:0, eth0:1, eth0:2 etc. where eth0 is the actual interface being aliased.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • jdillardJ
                  jdillard
                  last edited by

                  For those that have blank interface issues can you view the page source (or inspect the element if you know how) and grab the HTML for the select element with id="interfaces".

                  It should look something like:

                   <select class="form-control" id="interfaces" name="interfaces" multiple=""><option value="em0" selected="">wan</option></select>
                  
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    Dazog
                    last edited by

                    As requested:

                    <select class="form-control" id="interfaces" name="interfaces" multiple=""><option value="igb3" selected="">lan</option></select>

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • G
                      grandrivers
                      last edited by

                      <select class="form-control" id="interfaces" name="interfaces" multiple=""><option value="igb1" selected="">opt1</option><option value="igb2" selected="">lan</option></select>

                      pfsense plus 25.03 super micro A1SRM-2558F
                      C2558 32gig ECC  60gig SSD

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        MorpheusRO
                        last edited by

                        <select class="form-control" id="interfaces" name="interfaces" multiple=""><option value="igb0" selected="">wan</option><option value="igb1" selected="">opt3</option></select>

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • jdillardJ
                          jdillard
                          last edited by

                          Thanks! I was finally able to replicate the blank interface issue, looking into it now.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A
                            athurdent
                            last edited by

                            Will the vnstat database be included in the XML backup similar to RRD?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • jdillardJ
                              jdillard
                              last edited by

                              In theory yes, but I haven't messed with that code yet.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • jdillardJ
                                jdillard
                                last edited by

                                I just pushed version 0.4 and it should fix:

                                #6) Units are more accurate and consistent. it was mostly fixed before, but there were a couple small errors.

                                #10a) Interfaces shouldn't show up blank anymore, but it is recommended to reset the graphing data after updating the package.

                                #10b) not really a fix, but it doesn't look as bad as previously thought. I can pull in VLANs, IPSec, and PPPOE. More interface types will need to be tested. If you want to see which interfaces vnStat can capture data for you can run the command 'vnstat –iflist'.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M
                                  MyKroFt
                                  last edited by

                                  still have a blank line - it used to show as my LAN interface

                                  Myk

                                  Capture.PNG_thumb
                                  Capture.PNG

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • MikeV7896M
                                    MikeV7896
                                    last edited by

                                    I don't think that the update was released last night yet… I had updated my pfSense build maybe 15-20 minutes before your post time and the package manager still showed the .3 version of this package.

                                    The S in IOT stands for Security

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • jdillardJ
                                      jdillard
                                      last edited by

                                      I was able to reproduce on my home box. Hope to have a .5 out today.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • M
                                        MyKroFt
                                        last edited by

                                        @virgiliomi:

                                        I don't think that the update was released last night yet… I had updated my pfSense build maybe 15-20 minutes before your post time and the package manager still showed the .3 version of this package.

                                        I had the latest update released .4

                                        Myk

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • J
                                          Jabroni
                                          last edited by

                                          This is what just what i missed since the 2.2, but now finally Im going to be able to see how am i doing with the daily/weekly/monthly traffic per interface

                                          Will this be run as a stand alone package we can install on a stable train?? Or we need to upgrade to the snapshots in order to get it install/show ?

                                          Tried looking as a package on a 2.3_5 but it didnt show

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • MikeV7896M
                                            MikeV7896
                                            last edited by

                                            2.3.2 is likely going to be released this week, so it - and this package - will be available to the world soon enough.

                                            The S in IOT stands for Security

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.