Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Help with Firewall Log

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Firewalling
    43 Posts 6 Posters 11.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • johnpozJ
      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
      last edited by

      So did you go into your daytek and

      UNmarking "Broadcast DSL status to LAN" under ->System Maintenance->Management

      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • QinnQ
        Qinn
        last edited by

        @johnpoz:

        So did you go into your daytek and

        UNmarking "Broadcast DSL status to LAN" under ->System Maintenance->Management

        I will take a look at it and report back soon, at this time it is not possible to power it down. Not to be on hasty side, but I thought a Draytek Vigor 130 set into PPPoA to PPPoE and as so bridging between ISP and WAN was totally transparent.

        btw if you have taken a look I remove the file as there's a mac address in there you can't be to carefull ;)

        Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
        Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
        Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
          last edited by

          why would you have to power it down?

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • QinnQ
            Qinn
            last edited by

            As I said settings it to bridge mode between PPPoA and PPPoe, to the best of my knowledge it has no IP (that's why I said it was transparent) so I don't know how to login on it, is there a way? The moment I disconnect it from the Internet it get's an IP (static).

            Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
            Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
            Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
              last edited by

              well my cable modem is "transparent" ie pfsense gets a public IP..  And I can still access the cable modem via 192.168.100.1 - I would assume daytek would have the same sort of default IP for management even when in "bridge" mode.

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • QinnQ
                Qinn
                last edited by

                http://just.draytek.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=5617&Itemid=293&lang=en From what the specs say it seems that it could send DSl info (you are wright, still not checked it in the hardware though  ;) ), although I never checked this option and as I know not how to access it, I am still mandatory to power it down and connect it to my LAN as I don't know how to set an IP as It is on on the WAN side?

                Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
                Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
                Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                  last edited by

                  well the IP by default is 192.168.1.1 I think - this might be the IP even when in bridge mode.

                  What IP you using on pfsense lan side?

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • QinnQ
                    Qinn
                    last edited by

                    192.168.1.1 so they are the same I can change it, but I still don't understand that there can be a IP thats in the LAN range set on the WAN side  ???

                    Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
                    Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
                    Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • johnpozJ
                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                      last edited by

                      you can not.. if your pfsense lan is 192.168.1.0/24 then no you wouldn't be able to access your isp devices IP of 192.168.1.1 from devices on your lan.

                      Doesn't mean that device can not have that IP..

                      For example my cable modem is 192.168.100.1 my lan is 192.168.9.0/24 I can access it just fine without doing anything because pfsense send that traffic out its wan interface and the cable modem picks it up and answers.  Some devices might not do that - and you might have to setup a vip on your wan interface to be on the same network as your device, etc..

                      See the pfsense doc about accessing modem on wan, etc.

                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • QinnQ
                        Qinn
                        last edited by

                        Thanks I wll look into it it seems according to these http://www.geekzone.co.nz/forums.asp?forumid=66&topicid=196693 that it might be done I will report back also on the 0.0.0.0  port 4944 thanks (so far) for all your time, I am wiser now !!

                        Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
                        Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
                        Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • QinnQ
                          Qinn
                          last edited by

                          <off topic="">I see my Disk usage ( /mnt ) is  102% of 595MiB - ufs never saw that?</off>

                          Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
                          Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
                          Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • N
                            Nullity
                            last edited by

                            @Qinn:

                            <off topic="">I see my Disk usage ( /mnt ) is  102% of 595MiB - ufs never saw that?</off>

                            Did your tcpdump fill up /mnt?

                            Please correct any obvious misinformation in my posts.
                            -Not a professional; an arrogant ignoramous.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • DerelictD
                              Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                              last edited by

                              There shouldn't be anything mounted on /mnt unless you're doing something funky.

                              Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                              A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                              DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                              Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • QinnQ
                                Qinn
                                last edited by

                                @Derelict:

                                There shouldn't be anything mounted on /mnt unless you're doing something funky.

                                Yes I did stupid me  ;)

                                Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
                                Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
                                Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • QinnQ
                                  Qinn
                                  last edited by

                                  @johnpoz:

                                  So did you go into your daytek and

                                  UNmarking "Broadcast DSL status to LAN" under ->System Maintenance->Management

                                  Yes and unchecking "Broadcast DSL status to router in LAN" did the job, this option has been introduced in version 3.7.6.  Draytek mentions New features only in the release notes of the firmware and as I didn't update for long time (there was nothing worth updating IMO) I didn't knew it was there when I updated a week ago. So now I now (again) why you should always stay current with the lastest firmware.

                                  Thanks for your help!!

                                  Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
                                  Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
                                  Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • QinnQ
                                    Qinn
                                    last edited by

                                    I have another one I could use some help with

                                    Aug 8 16:00 WLAN 0.0.0.0 224.0.0.1

                                    I did a capture with pfsense, but nothing was captured. I tried it with tcpdump and I see some multicasts, but still I don't know what the origin is. Is there someway to find the source?

                                    I have a hunch that it is a Sonos device 16:10:30.388315 xx:xx:xx:xx:75:14 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, Unknown Ethertype (0x6970), length 74:

                                    Thanks for any help!

                                    Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
                                    Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
                                    Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • johnpozJ
                                      johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                      last edited by

                                      yeah 224 is multicast, looks like you already tracked it down via the mac - what is the dest port?

                                      I have turned off default block logging because there is quite a bit of noise when you do that, and created my own block rules above the default that log what I like to see, like tcp syn into my wan.  And then any traffic to any pfsense IP on my lan side.

                                      I block most multicast traffic at the switch level since I don't use it there is no reason for it to even get to pfsense interface.  While I allow between devices on a specific network/vlan I block it from going to pfsense at the switch ;)

                                      An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                      If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                      Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                      SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • QinnQ
                                        Qinn
                                        last edited by

                                        Thats a problem there is no port mentioned in pfsense. I tried a tcpdump -i em1 dest host 224.0.0.1 but nothing. So I did a tcpdump i em1 -c 200 and that gave 2 multicasts from the same mac address at a certian time frame that it could correspond with the log in pfSense, but I am not sure.

                                        Hardeware: Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4125 CPU @ 2.00GHz 102 GB mSATA SSD (ZFS)
                                        Firmware: Latest-stable-pfSense CE (amd64)
                                        Packages: pfBlockerNG devel-beta (beta tester) - Avahi - Notes - Ntopng - PIMD/udpbroadcastrelay - Service Watchdog - System Patches

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • K
                                          kpa
                                          last edited by

                                          Only TCP and UDP have a notion of a "port". Other IP protocols are free to use ports or not to use them as they choose.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • johnpozJ
                                            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                                            last edited by

                                            what does the firewall log show?  It should list the protocol if its a portless one.  Does the mac address match up too. you obfuscated the part that would let us look up the hardware maker.

                                            If the firewall blocking it then you would be able to capture it.  224.0.0.1 is the all hosts multicast address.

                                            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                                            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                                            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                                            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.