Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Welcome to the 2.4 board

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.4 Development Snapshots
    28 Posts 15 Posters 31.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      jwt Netgate
      last edited by

      2.4 snapshot builds are available

      All open issues currently target 2.4 here

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jahonixJ
        jahonix
        last edited by

        It might help to know that there are two (three) development branches currently:
        2.4.0 (amd64)  HIGHLY-EXPERIMENTAL pfSense 2.4.0 ALPHA developers tree
        2.3.3 (amd64 & i386)  EXPERIMENTAL pfSense 2.3.3 developers tree

        So 2.3.3 is still active.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • PippinP
          Pippin
          last edited by

          @jwt:

          target 2.4 here

          Gives a 403 here.

          I gloomily came to the ironic conclusion that if you take a highly intelligent person and give them the best possible, elite education, then you will most likely wind up with an academic who is completely impervious to reality.
          Halton Arp

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • MikeV7896M
            MikeV7896
            last edited by

            @Pippin:

            @jwt:

            target 2.4 here

            Gives a 403 here.

            Try this one instead…

            https://redmine.pfsense.org/projects/pfsense/issues?query_id=71

            The S in IOT stands for Security

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • G
              genesislubrigas
              last edited by

              I wonder if the problems on icap protocol error and suricata stopping will be resolved in this version.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                jwt Netgate
                last edited by

                @jahonix:

                It might help to know that there are two (three) development branches currently:
                2.4.0 (amd64)  HIGHLY-EXPERIMENTAL pfSense 2.4.0 ALPHA developers tree
                2.3.3 (amd64 & i386)  EXPERIMENTAL pfSense 2.3.3 developers tree

                So 2.3.3 is still active.

                We may, or may not, ever cut a 2.3.3

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B
                  bimmerdriver
                  last edited by

                  I installed this version to take a look. There is some strange behaviour relative to 2.3.3 development snapshot (with identical settings), including a crash report. Would you like me to post details somewhere?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jahonixJ
                    jahonix
                    last edited by

                    @jwt:

                    We may, or may not, ever cut a 2.3.3

                    Sure and it's your call anyways.

                    I am with this project since 0.9something and AFAIK this is the first time that there are two public development branches simultaneously.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • B
                      bfeitell
                      last edited by

                      Will there be an i386 build when 2.4 is released?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • P
                        phil.davis
                        last edited by

                        @bfeitell:

                        Will there be an i386 build when 2.4 is released?

                        No, 32-bit has been taken out of the build scripts for 2.4.
                        2.3.* is the last release stream for 32-bit. There is yet to be an official announcement about the EOL support for that - I am hoping that ordinary code/fixes will continue to be back-ported and that a formal release build will be done "every now and then" of the RELENG_2_3 branch up to the EOL for FreeBSD 10.3 in 2018.

                        As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
                        If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • B
                          bfeitell
                          last edited by

                          @phil.davis:

                          No, 32-bit has been taken out of the build scripts for 2.4.
                          2.3.* is the last release stream for 32-bit. There is yet to be an official announcement about the EOL support for that - I am hoping that ordinary code/fixes will continue to be back-ported and that a formal release build will be done "every now and then" of the RELENG_2_3 branch up to the EOL for FreeBSD 10.3 in 2018.

                          Thank you for the quick response.  That is a bit of a bummer as I have a couple of i386 machines in production.  Oh well.  :(

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • N
                            NOYB
                            last edited by

                            @phil.davis:

                            I am hoping that ordinary code/fixes will continue to be back-ported and that a formal release build will be done "every now and then" of the RELENG_2_3 branch up to the EOL for FreeBSD 10.3 in 2018.

                            I'm with you.

                            Would be nice if they could commit to say 2 maintenance releases in 2017.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • jahonixJ
                              jahonix
                              last edited by

                              @NOYB:

                              … if they could commit to say 2 maintenance releases in 2017.

                              Releases contain new features and/or fixes.
                              New features won't go into 2.3.x anymore and security/bug fixes are released when necessary. Do you already know if/when/how many fixes are needed in 2017?  :o

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • P
                                phil.davis
                                last edited by

                                @jahonix:

                                @NOYB:

                                … if they could commit to say 2 maintenance releases in 2017.

                                Releases contain new features and/or fixes.
                                New features won't go into 2.3.x anymore and security/bug fixes are released when necessary. Do you already know if/when/how many fixes are needed in 2017?  :o

                                New features are still being back-ported into the RELENG_2_3 branch. So far all the user code (as distinct from build scripts…) that has happened in master for 2.4 has been stuff that works just fine in 2.3 on FreeBSD 10.3, so the backports have been easy Git cherry-picking. Thus there are new features sitting in RELENG_2_3 that would just "pop out" by themselves into a 2.3.3 release build, if that is ever done.

                                As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
                                If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • N
                                  NOYB
                                  last edited by

                                  @jahonix:

                                  Do you already know if/when/how many fixes are needed in 2017?  :o

                                  As a matter of fact yes I do.

                                  If?  Yes
                                  When? Q2 & Q4, and any others deemed prudent.
                                  How Many? At least 2, plus any others deemed prudent.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • B
                                    bimmerdriver
                                    last edited by

                                    Would someone please make this topic sticky?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • E
                                      epek
                                      last edited by

                                      Where to find ARM-Sources and Snapshots?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • K
                                        kejianshi
                                        last edited by

                                        Question - processor specific issue.

                                        Will pfsense 2.4 64bit run on a D2700 board?  Its supposed to be 64 bit capable but I've read about some issues.

                                        Currently there is a 32 bit version of pfsense running on a pfsense install that is far far away.

                                        I'd test it myself but I can't physically touch that system.  So, anyone know?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • P
                                          Phil.Scarr
                                          last edited by

                                          @phil.davis:

                                          @bfeitell:

                                          Will there be an i386 build when 2.4 is released?

                                          No, 32-bit has been taken out of the build scripts for 2.4.
                                          2.3.* is the last release stream for 32-bit. There is yet to be an official announcement about the EOL support for that - I am hoping that ordinary code/fixes will continue to be back-ported and that a formal release build will be done "every now and then" of the RELENG_2_3 branch up to the EOL for FreeBSD 10.3 in 2018.

                                          That's interesting, because the SG-1000 is based on the ARM Cortex-A8 which is is a 32-bit processor and only runs 2.4.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • P
                                            phil.davis
                                            last edited by

                                            @Phil.Scarr:

                                            @phil.davis:

                                            @bfeitell:

                                            Will there be an i386 build when 2.4 is released?

                                            No, 32-bit has been taken out of the build scripts for 2.4.
                                            2.3.* is the last release stream for 32-bit. There is yet to be an official announcement about the EOL support for that - I am hoping that ordinary code/fixes will continue to be back-ported and that a formal release build will be done "every now and then" of the RELENG_2_3 branch up to the EOL for FreeBSD 10.3 in 2018.

                                            That's interesting, because the SG-1000 is based on the ARM Cortex-A8 which is is a 32-bit processor and only runs 2.4.

                                            The intended detailed meaning is that 32-bit i386 has been removed (and all nanoBSD has been removed).
                                            Technically speaking, yes there is still 32-bit in 2.4 because a 32-bit ARM build has been added.

                                            As the Greek philosopher Isosceles used to say, "There are 3 sides to every triangle."
                                            If I helped you, then help someone else - buy someone a gift from the INF catalog http://secure.inf.org/gifts/usd/

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.