Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PfBlockerNG v2.0 w/DNSBL

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfBlockerNG
    1.1k Posts 192 Posters 1.7m Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G
      gcu_greyarea
      last edited by

      I was able to narrow down the issue through further testing.

      The log entry and its assorted Alert ("No Match") …

      DNSBL Recject,Oct 22 16:09:42,192.168.15.216,192.168.15.1, | / |

      ... can be reproduced by manually testing the DNSBL VIP Ports. e.g. http://vip-ip:80 (8081) . The error is generated for both https and https on ports (80, 8081, 443, 8433)

      As it turns out our ISP Provided router wants to connect to the DNSBL VIP IP via port 80 (Seen via packet capture)...
      Since WAN and LAN Interfaces are Bridged and filtering is done on the Bridge IF I have no way of blocking the Routers connection attempts...

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • B
        blueduckdock
        last edited by

        Quick Q- in the sync section there is "Sync to configured backup server." Is this for CARP installs?
        I'd like to have my HQ box sync not only to the other carp member but also our regional offices. Wondering if/how this works.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • X
          xbipin
          last edited by

          sorry if this seems like a basic question as this thread is extremely long so just managed to read around 20% of it.

          im new to pfblockerng and what i was looking for is be able to block DNS on a per host basis which i dont seem to be able to make it work, as soon as i try to block youtube.com it aplies to unbound in general for every1.

          is it even possible to block dns on a per host basis as most other threads i read was using opendns but that too it applies in general for every1

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B
            blueduckdock
            last edited by

            @xbipin:

            sorry if this seems like a basic question as this thread is extremely long so just managed to read around 20% of it.

            im new to pfblockerng and what i was looking for is be able to block DNS on a per host basis which i dont seem to be able to make it work, as soon as i try to block youtube.com it aplies to unbound in general for every1.

            is it even possible to block dns on a per host basis as most other threads i read was using opendns but that too it applies in general for every1

            You could put those hosts on a separate interface. I would think that'd be easy enough.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • X
              xbipin
              last edited by

              @blueduckdock:

              @xbipin:

              sorry if this seems like a basic question as this thread is extremely long so just managed to read around 20% of it.

              im new to pfblockerng and what i was looking for is be able to block DNS on a per host basis which i dont seem to be able to make it work, as soon as i try to block youtube.com it aplies to unbound in general for every1.

              is it even possible to block dns on a per host basis as most other threads i read was using opendns but that too it applies in general for every1

              You could put those hosts on a separate interface. I would think that'd be easy enough.

              well we have a small LAN and creating separate interfaces using vlans would be some what of a overkill.
              if unbound could serve DNS queries per host that would solve this as i believe it would be a very useful feature and many would be interested in.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • G
                gcu_greyarea
                last edited by

                You could Configure your DHCP server  and specify the DNS option as external DNS server e.g. Google DNS.
                For the small number if hosts you need to filter create a static DHCP Mapping(Reservation) and specify the unbound DNS server on the LAN Address.
                Create an IP alias for these hosts and create a firewall rule to stop them acciessing any other DNS servers.

                Obviously this creates a problem when all hosts must use the unbound resolver.

                Other options would be - running a few virtual instances of pfSense -each with their own DnS resolver and DNSBLs. Then specify custom DNS servers via DHCP mappings.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • X
                  xbipin
                  last edited by

                  we currently block external DNS access from LAN and force every1 to use unbound and i guess unbound config doesnt mention any option to filter dns per host or probably run multiple instances of it which would seem like a more easier option without the complexities do multiple other things for same effect.

                  cyber roam i guess does this dns filtering per host so curious on how do they achieve it as many other ppl in my region use that just for the purpose of blocking certain domains per host

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • BBcan177B
                    BBcan177 Moderator
                    last edited by

                    There is no option in The Unbound Resolver to "Filter by host"…. So if you want to bypass DNSBL for some hosts... You need to define a different DNS server for those LAN devices....

                    "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                    Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                    Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                    Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • X
                      xbipin
                      last edited by

                      @BBcan177:

                      There is no option in The Unbound Resolver to "Filter by host"…. So if you want to bypass DNSBL for some hosts... You need to define a different DNS server for those LAN devices....

                      thanks for the info, is there any such feature request at unbound side or probably any plans to add it in the future?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • P
                        pfBasic Banned
                        last edited by

                        I just ran into an issue and wanted to put it out here.

                        I run Private Internet Access as a VPN for one of my interfaces, I also use their DNS's.

                        I guess it's not really too surprising that this happened but my internet went down due to DNS and it was because the PIA DNS were being blocked by one of my pfBlockerNG lists, specifically "http://www.stopforumspam.com/downloads/bannedips.zip".

                        Anyways I know I'm not the only person who uses PIA DNS so I thought I'd put it out on here.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • BBcan177B
                          BBcan177 Moderator
                          last edited by

                          @pfBasic:

                          I just ran into an issue and wanted to put it out here.

                          I run Private Internet Access as a VPN for one of my interfaces, I also use their DNS's.

                          I guess it's not really too surprising that this happened but my internet went down due to DNS and it was because the PIA DNS were being blocked by one of my pfBlockerNG lists, specifically "http://www.stopforumspam.com/downloads/bannedips.zip".

                          Anyways I know I'm not the only person who uses PIA DNS so I thought I'd put it out on here.

                          Best to submit this to Stop Forum Spam.

                          "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                          Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                          Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                          Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • H
                            hulleyrob
                            last edited by

                            Is anyone else seeing this lately after a cron?

                            There were error(s) loading the rules: pfctl: DIOCXCOMMIT: Device busy - The line in question reads [0]:

                            Has only started happening in the last few weeks.

                            Some googling suggested setting NIC speed manually from auto.

                            If anyone has got any other ideas please post.

                            Thanks

                            Rob

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • BBcan177B
                              BBcan177 Moderator
                              last edited by

                              Looks like a bad aliastable possibly. Try a Force reload and/or a reboot.

                              Check the pfblockerng.log and system logs for further clues. If you hover over the Firewall rules, do you get the aliastable popup? Could also be unrelated to the package. You could temporarily disable the package and see if it re occurs.

                              "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                              Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                              Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                              Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • H
                                hulleyrob
                                last edited by

                                Ok thanks for that does this look ok as it is the only alias that didn't look right to me?

                                It only seemed to appear after i ticked de-duplication is it.

                                Rob

                                ![Screen Shot 2016-11-07 at 13.19.46.jpg](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2016-11-07 at 13.19.46.jpg)
                                ![Screen Shot 2016-11-07 at 13.19.46.jpg_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Screen Shot 2016-11-07 at 13.19.46.jpg_thumb)

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • BBcan177B
                                  BBcan177 Moderator
                                  last edited by

                                  That is used for the IP Suppression… Its ok as is...

                                  "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                                  Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                                  Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                                  Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • E
                                    erwintwr
                                    last edited by

                                    Hi guys

                                    i am busy running a test server where i plan to simulate our current Squid+squidguard setup, but add DNSBL to it.

                                    one think i note is that some ad's are still getting through ( comparing with AdBlock on chrome)

                                    Is it possible to load an AdBlock list ( and from where?) , so that user experience is similar to having AdBlock extension activate?

                                    Thx

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • P
                                      pfBasic Banned
                                      last edited by

                                      It looks like I got one thing working on my setup but killed DNSBL in the process.

                                      I recently setup policy based routing where my pass firewall rules determine the Gateway to be used. I did this so that I could have one interface route all traffic through my VPN client and another interface not utilize the VPN at all. That works great, but ever since I set that up I have 0 hits on all of my DNSBL feeds and ads are coming through.

                                      Any ideas on how I can use pfBlockerNG DNSBL while still utilizing policy based routing for my purposes?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • X
                                        XmickS
                                        last edited by

                                        My DNSBL has stopped working. When I do a Fprce Update, I get this in the log

                                        ------------------------------------------
                                        Assembling database... completed
                                        Validating database... completed
                                        Reloading Unbound... Failed to Reload... Restoring previous database.... Not completed.
                                        
                                        *** DNSBL update [ 0 ] [ 8654 ] ... OUT OF SYNC ! ***
                                        ------------------------------------------
                                        

                                        When I execute "Shell Output - unbound-control -c /var/unbound/unbound.conf status"
                                        I get this:

                                        error: SSL handshake failed
                                        34386131464:error:14090086:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed:/builder/pfsense-232/tmp/FreeBSD-src/secure/lib/libssl/../../../crypto/openssl/ssl/s3_clnt.c:1191:
                                        

                                        I've just uninstalled PfBlockerNG and after that a reboot, but it still persists. Any ideas?

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • L
                                          laviniuc
                                          last edited by

                                          the cron/reload/update job stalls for me. no error, just stops at dnsbl. works if i disable alexa whitelist or if i stop the dnsbl component. anyone else having this problem?

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • BBcan177B
                                            BBcan177 Moderator
                                            last edited by

                                            @laviniuc:

                                            the cron/reload/update job stalls for me. no error, just stops at dnsbl. works if i disable alexa whitelist or if i stop the dnsbl component. anyone else having this problem?

                                            It might be related to Alexa retiring its TOP1M feed… They have since restored the feed, but uncertain of its ultimate fate...

                                            https://twitter.com/adamcaudill/status/800813805009768448
                                            https://twitter.com/Alexa_Support/status/801167423726489600

                                            I would try the following and see if it fixes this issue:

                                            mv /var/db/pfblockerng/top-1m.csv /var/db/pfblockerng/top-1m.csv.old
                                            

                                            Then run a "Force Reload" and see if it re-downloads the Alexa Archive and rebuilds the Alexa whitelist…

                                            As reference, the Alexa TOP1M feed url:

                                            https://s3.amazonaws.com/alexa-static/top-1m.csv.zip
                                            

                                            "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                                            Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                                            Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                                            Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.