Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PFBlockerNG Can`t ByPass Client *With WPAD

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfBlockerNG
    11 Posts 5 Posters 2.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H
      heper
      last edited by

      this isn't the correct forum section for this question.
      there is a special packages subsection for this: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?board=15.0

      as for you questions:
      no clue, but dealing with squid is always a pain in the ass ;)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        doktornotor Banned
        last edited by

        pfBNG will not block anything from Squid (localhost) since the traffic won't ever match.

        P.S. Not exactly sure what's "changed my general configuration WAN TO WAN" supposed to mean.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
          last edited by

          His wan to wan suppose to mean he changed pfblockers auto rule connection to create inbound and outbound rules in floating using wan and wan as inbound??  Agreed be fuzzy on what he changed from to, etc..

          While the pfblocker is a slick package - I am not a fan of any sort of auto rule anything.  When I was playing with it, I always just used the aliases and created own rules.. But dok is right on the money (as always) your rule would have to block the firewall as the source, since when your using the proxy that is what is doing the going, not the client.. Client says hey proxy go get me www.something.com for me, and then then send it to me after you got it..

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • H
            Harvy66
            last edited by

            In a nutshell, pFBlockerNG is blocking traffic that goes through PFSense and using a proxy mean the traffic is no longer going through. It's now terminating and originating in PFSense.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • G
              GoldenShark
              last edited by

              @johnpoz:

              His wan to wan suppose to mean he changed pfblockers auto rule connection to create inbound and outbound rules in floating using wan and wan as inbound??  Agreed be fuzzy on what he changed from to, etc..

              While the pfblocker is a slick package - I am not a fan of any sort of auto rule anything.  When I was playing with it, I always just used the aliases and created own rules.. But dok is right on the money (as always) your rule would have to block the firewall as the source, since when your using the proxy that is what is doing the going, not the client.. Client says hey proxy go get me www.something.com for me, and then then send it to me after you got it..

              So Where is solution ?? :D

              @Harvy66:

              In a nutshell, pFBlockerNG is blocking traffic that goes through PFSense and using a proxy mean the traffic is no longer going through. It's now terminating and originating in PFSense.

              @Harvy66:

              In a nutshell, pFBlockerNG is blocking traffic that goes through PFSense and using a proxy mean the traffic is no longer going through. It's now terminating and originating in PFSense.

              You're totally right. But I created "any to any * * PASS to Floating" Rules . It could be work.. If i change it Single hostor alias to Any *  *  It wouldn't work.

              @doktornotor:

              pfBNG will not block anything from Squid (localhost) since the traffic won't ever match.

              P.S. Not exactly sure what's "changed my general configuration WAN TO WAN" supposed to mean.

              P.S. Not exactly sure what's "changed my general configuration WAN TO WAN" supposed to mean.

              It Means : http://prntscr.com/dm41u3
              If i can change it like this. It could be work.

              But WAN to LAN " NOT WORKING WITH SQUID PROXY"

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                doktornotor Banned
                last edited by

                Uh.

                @GoldenShark:

                But I created "any to any * * PASS to Floating" Rules . It could be work.. If i change it Single hostor alias to Any *  *  It wouldn't work.

                Huh? You are trying to fix non-working blocking by allow anything rules? How on earth could that ever possibly help?!?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • G
                  GoldenShark
                  last edited by

                  @doktornotor:

                  Uh.

                  @GoldenShark:

                  But I created "any to any * * PASS to Floating" Rules . It could be work.. If i change it Single hostor alias to Any *  *  It wouldn't work.

                  Huh? You are trying to fix non-working blocking by allow anything rules? How on earth could that ever possibly help?!?

                  If I can Active this rule : http://prntscr.com/dm46ss

                  PF BLOCKER ACCEPT IT

                  If I can change rule like this : http://prntscr.com/dm47fk

                  PF BLOCKER DOES NOT ACCEPT

                  I think It is not familiar with Single host or alias source.. "WAN TO WAN"

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    doktornotor Banned
                    last edited by

                    It does NOT "accept" it because it's not matching the traffic. The source is NOT "FreeClients". The source IP is Squid on pfSense.

                    Remove that absolutely horrible allow any floating rule, you are killing your firewall functionality with such nonsense.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • G
                      GoldenShark
                      last edited by

                      @doktornotor:

                      It does NOT "accept" it because it's not matching the traffic. The source is NOT "FreeClients". The source IP is Squid on pfSense.

                      Remove that absolutely horrible allow any floating rule, you are killing your firewall functionality with such nonsense.

                      :D  ;D so how could I match it with my freeclients ???

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        doktornotor Banned
                        last edited by

                        You don't. Not possible. Put them on a non-proxied VLAN.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.