Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Dashboard Traffic Graphs

    2.3.3 Development Snapshots
    12
    19
    19.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • chpalmerC
      chpalmer
      last edited by

      Firefox v50 and Internet Explorer (windows 7)

      2.3.2-RELEASE-p1 (i386)
      built on Tue Sep 27 12:13:32 CDT 2016

      When Im at the dashboard and allow the traffic graphs to populate switching to another tab and then back the traffic graphs are empty and start to populate over.

      Is this by design?  I really want to be able to leave the page and still have them record so I can come back and view results.  I did search but found no references to this with my chosen search terms.. 

      Triggering snowflakes one by one..
      Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        maverick_slo
        last edited by

        Yup, that is how it's supposed to be…

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • chpalmerC
          chpalmer
          last edited by

          Bummer..  Thanks!

          Triggering snowflakes one by one..
          Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Raul RamosR
            Raul Ramos
            last edited by

            @maverick_slo:

            Yup, that is how it's supposed to be…

            How many Graphs have this behavior in Gui interfaces? one?

            pfSense:
            ASRock -> Wolfdale1333-D667 (2GB TeamElite Ram)
            Marvell 88SA8040 Sata to CF(Sandisk 4GB) Controller
            NIC's: RTL8100E (Internal ) and Intel® PRO/1000 PT Dual (Intel 82571GB)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              Cino
              last edited by

              @maverick_slo:

              Yup, that is how it's supposed to be…

              It is really annoying. It's a step backwards IMHO.  Also, I've noticed interface names are not showing anymore. Only opt1,opt2, and so on.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A
                ariyako
                last edited by

                @chpalmer:

                Firefox v50 and Internet Explorer (windows 7)

                2.3.2-RELEASE-p1 (i386)
                built on Tue Sep 27 12:13:32 CDT 2016

                When Im at the dashboard and allow the traffic graphs to populate switching to another tab and then back the traffic graphs are empty and start to populate over.

                Is this by design?  I really want to be able to leave the page and still have them record so I can come back and view results.  I did search but found no references to this with my chosen search terms.. 

                same with 2.4, wish we got option to keep all the traffic graphs to populate when switchin to another tab

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • H
                  Harvy66
                  last edited by

                  Tabs are meant to be a form of Window Management. If we assume tabs are just windows, then it is safe to say that "changing tabs" is akin to losing focus. If we substitute these terms, then we can ask, "is it desirable that we lose traffic graph information when focus is lost?"

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • chpalmerC
                    chpalmer
                    last edited by

                    @Harvy66:

                    we can ask, "is it desirable that we lose traffic graph information when focus is lost?"

                    Yes.

                    I am able to multitask and many times desire to watch the overall picture of the graph over time.  When that history (short as it is) goes away I cannot get it back for overall comparison.

                    Ive discovered a way to keep the graphs active by opening up another browser but still as soon as I minimize the dashboard to retrieve something on my desktop the results vanish.

                    I too have to say it seems like a step backwards.

                    Triggering snowflakes one by one..
                    Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P
                      pablot
                      last edited by

                      This does not happened on the previous version, so I have to agree with the ones that see this as a step backwards.

                      Not only that the history get lost, but also the name of the interface as only wan, lan, opt1, etc. names are printed. That also was better in the previous version.

                      Sorry guys, but this seems as problems or limitations with the new graphics and not a design decision.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        chrcoluk
                        last edited by

                        I agree with the above comments it is desirable in my case to have it still updating when not in focus, the only downside is the obvious increase in cpu usage, but people if they dont like it can close the tab or put it in a suspended state.

                        A workaround is to have the tab in its own window, even if the window is in the background it will still update as its considered the foreground tab for that window.

                        pfSense CE 2.7.2

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • P
                          PiBa
                          last edited by

                          FYI, i've send a pullrequest against 2.4beta master branche.: https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/pull/3384

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • R
                            robi
                            last edited by

                            +1 for this

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • C
                              Cino
                              last edited by

                              @PiBa:

                              FYI, i've send a pullrequest against 2.4beta master branche.: https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/pull/3384

                              Thank you so much!! I haven't tried 2.4 yet but overwrote the files on my 2.3.3 box. Interface names are correct and graphs dont reset anymore. Nice touch adding the option to refresh or not.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • P
                                pablot
                                last edited by

                                @Cino:

                                @PiBa:

                                FYI, i've send a pullrequest against 2.4beta master branche.: https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/pull/3384

                                Thank you so much!! I haven't tried 2.4 yet but overwrote the files on my 2.3.3 box. Interface names are correct and graphs dont reset anymore. Nice touch adding the option to refresh or not.

                                Done the same and voila!, everything working as it should!. Thanx!!!
                                Will this be included in 2.3.3 and 2.4 ??

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M
                                  maverick_slo
                                  last edited by

                                  This is really awsome :)
                                  Tried and all works like a charm.

                                  2 points though:

                                  1. It would be nice to have all names corrected
                                  2. It would be cool to have current download / upload speed displayed

                                  Thanks!

                                  graphs.PNG_thumb
                                  graphs.PNG

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • P
                                    PiBa
                                    last edited by

                                    @maverick_slo:

                                    1. It would be nice to have all names corrected
                                    2. It would be cool to have current download / upload speed displayed

                                    1. I thought about that, but if your using longer interface-names it could start overlapping soon, while the real interface identifiers are usually pretty short avoiding that for the most part.
                                    2. Could be nice but doesn't really add much i think, you can hover over the graphs and see the numbers for each position, as for your PPPOE link currently doing 28Kb/s down and 18Kb/s up (approximately) would it really be that much more informational if you could instantly see the numbers for the last past second.?.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • M
                                      maverick_slo
                                      last edited by

                                      It would make a nice touch 😁
                                      At least on my primary link…

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • T
                                        tripplex
                                        last edited by

                                        My traffic graphs not showing correct figures while under load

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • G
                                          grandrivers
                                          last edited by

                                          yes this is obvious if you do to status traffic graph, have not dug into it though just no its way off

                                          pfsense 2.4 super micro A1SRM-2558F
                                          C2558 8gig ECC  60gig SSD
                                          tripple Wan dual pppoe

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.