• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Bring TFTP Package Back [ 50$ ]

Completed Bounties
5
10
5.2k
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Z
    Zedful
    last edited by Sep 13, 2016, 1:05 PM

    Hello
    I'm here with my 50$
    for bringing TFTP server package back which is removed in 2.3.

    2.3 Removed Packages

    TFTP - no package maintainer, not converted

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • J
      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
      last edited by Sep 19, 2016, 4:01 PM

      In addition to it not having a maintainer, we switched from inetd to xinetd and the TFTP daemon did not work with xinetd. I am not sure if this has been corrected yet, but if it has, it may be possible to bring it back eventually.

      Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

      Do not Chat/PM for help!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        doktornotor Banned
        last edited by Dec 5, 2016, 11:06 PM

        Done by seidler2547 @ https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/pull/167

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
          last edited by Dec 7, 2016, 5:23 PM

          "we switched from inetd to xinetd and the TFTP daemon did not work with xinetd"

          Then why is there a freaking entry in the conf for it.. How can we remove this - it just spams the logs.

          [2.3.2-RELEASE][root@pfsense.local.lan]/: cat /var/etc/xinetd.conf 
          service 6969-udp                                                   
          {                                                                   
                  type = unlisted                                             
                  bind = 127.0.0.1                                           
                  port = 6969                                                 
                  socket_type = dgram                                         
                  protocol = udp                                             
                  wait = yes                                                 
                  user = root                                                 
                  server = /usr/libexec/tftp-proxy                           
                  server_args = -v                                           
          }

          [2.3.2-RELEASE][root@pfsense.local.lan]/:

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • J
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
            last edited by Dec 7, 2016, 5:27 PM

            That's tftp-proxy, not tftpd. And that does work.

            Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
              last edited by Dec 7, 2016, 5:41 PM

              Oh my bad then.. Just saw ports 6969 and tftp, didn't catch the -proxy part ;)

              Since I do not use this, will never use it in this environment - how can I remove this so it doesn't come back and keep spamming the logs..

              Dec 7 08:05:39 xinetd 50417 Reconfigured: new=0 old=1 dropped=0 (services)
              Dec 7 08:05:39 xinetd 50417 readjusting service 6969-udp
              Dec 7 08:05:39 xinetd 50417 Swapping defaults
              Dec 7 08:05:39 xinetd 50417 Starting reconfiguration

              I do not have the the proxy enabled.  So why would this entry be in there?  If I remove it it just comes back.

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.7.2, 24.11

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                last edited by Dec 7, 2016, 6:03 PM

                That would be a question for a new thread in a different board

                Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  doktornotor Banned
                  last edited by Dec 8, 2016, 8:14 AM

                  @johnpoz:

                  I do not have the the proxy enabled.  So why would this entry be in there?  If I remove it it just comes back.

                  You  should be able to set up a separate syslog facility for the xinetd with location optimized to /dev/null with a small patch to system_syslogd_start(). Frankly, I'm tempted to submit this as a PR – because the system log now mostly consists of the competely useless xinetd noise.

                  https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/6308

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • S
                    seidler2547
                    last edited by Jun 19, 2017, 9:38 AM

                    @doktornotor:

                    Done by seidler2547 @ https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/pull/167

                    Right, that's me :)

                    Glad to help.

                    Stefan

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Z
                      Zedful
                      last edited by Jun 28, 2017, 10:31 AM

                      O o
                      Thank You !
                      a PM is sent.
                      This can be moved to "Completed Bounties".

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.