Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    [SOLVED] Traffic graph weirdness

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.4 Development Snapshots
    26 Posts 7 Posters 4.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      PiBa
      last edited by

      Maybe you could install "nload" on ssh/console?

      pkg add http://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd:11:x86:64/latest/All/nload-0.7.4_1.txz
      
      

      Start it use arrows to switch to desired nic/vlan and compare with traffic graphs.

      It should pull statistics from sysctl just like pfSense.. And if also wrong then points a little to freebsd.
      Though i suppose it could still be a issue introduced by pfSense's changes somewhere..

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M
        maverick_slo
        last edited by

        Hehe :)
        So here we go, guess pfsense bug after all….

        Untitled.png
        Untitled.png_thumb

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          PiBa
          last edited by

          Oké i guess its still not 100% definitive…

          Pfsense calls sysctl with:

          CTL_NET, PF_LINK, NETLINK_GENERIC, IFMIB_IFDATA, {ifidx}, IFDATA_GENERAL
          

          Where it retrieves the data: bytes, packets, collisions, multicasts, mtu
          https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/blob/devel/devel/php56-pfSense-module/files/pfSense.c#L3210

          While nload calls sysctl with:

          CTL_NET, PF_ROUTE, 0, 0, NET_RT_IFLIST, 0
          

          Where it retrieves the data: bytes, packets, errors
          https://github.com/liuyang1/nload/blob/master/src/devreader-bsd.cpp#L108

          So its similar but not the same, and that might be for a good reason. I'm not exactly sure.. Though i guess most of those extra data items are not needed for traffic graphs..

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            maverick_slo
            last edited by

            Jarred is on the case 😁
            Maybe just fewer flags and thats it.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jdillardJ
              jdillard
              last edited by

              I think this is the issue jahonix was referring to: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/3314

              If that's the case someone else might pick up the ticket, but for now I'll try and find the commit with the patch.

              edit: I tried running:

              git log --since "MAY 18 2015" --until "MAY 20 2015" --pretty=format:"%Cred%h%Creset -%C(yellow)%d%Creset %s %Cgreen(%ad) %C(bold blue)<%an>%Creset"
              

              on the following repos:

              
              pfsense/pfsense
              pfsense/FreeBSD-ports
              pfsense/FreeBSD-src
              
              

              without any luck finding the patch so far. I may have accidentally missed it or be taking the wrong approach.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P
                PiBa
                last edited by

                Found it: https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense-tools/commit/ad55e66a3fb817f8e54bae7bf38306039b82e3ad

                Or: https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-src/commit/939f11b196e7d22a1ce3da8533e97ff3e92510b6#diff-437f2b0c100f75faf75f7c5b60eca6a4R1156

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • P
                  PiBa
                  last edited by

                  2.3:

                   			ifp->if_opackets++;
                   			//ifp->if_omcasts += mcast;
                   			//ifp->if_obytes += len;
                  

                  2.4:

                  			if_inc_counter(ifp, IFCOUNTER_OPACKETS, 1);
                  			if_inc_counter(ifp, IFCOUNTER_OBYTES, len);
                  			if_inc_counter(ifp, IFCOUNTER_OMCASTS, mcast);
                  

                  In 2.4 it looks different.. probably needs some // as well.. https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-src/blob/RELENG_2_4/sys/net/if_vlan.c#L1132

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jahonixJ
                    jahonix
                    last edited by

                    I love this kind of collaboration, really great!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • jdillardJ
                      jdillard
                      last edited by

                      Nice work PiBa! And thanks for the lead jahonix!

                      I updated the ticket with the new info: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/7751

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        maverick_slo
                        last edited by

                        Thanks guys!
                        This us why I prefer pfsense to other fw's…  ;)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • jahonixJ
                          jahonix
                          last edited by

                          @jared: I didn't do a thing despite remembering that I had this problem in the past myself.
                          And someone gave me a smite for it anyways.  ;-)

                          I'd love to contribute more actively but my programming abilities are elsewhere (Crestron mainly).

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • M
                            maverick_slo
                            last edited by

                            Resolved with todays snap!

                            Thanks guys!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Raul RamosR
                              Raul Ramos
                              last edited by

                              Hi

                              My Lan is a parent interface of 2 Vlan's. When someone transfere something from internet on one of the Vlan's interface the Lan interface have the same bandwidth usage (if no one use Lan otherwise it sum the  bandwidth). Ideally, in my case, should be the bandwidth used in Vlan not sum in the Parent interface.

                              Some stuff i can point is the rule from Vlan to internet have a limiter.

                              The double bandwidth is solved in Vlan's interfaces.

                              pfSense:
                              ASRock -> Wolfdale1333-D667 (2GB TeamElite Ram)
                              Marvell 88SA8040 Sata to CF(Sandisk 4GB) Controller
                              NIC's: RTL8100E (Internal ) and Intel® PRO/1000 PT Dual (Intel 82571GB)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.