Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Routing Problem in Test Network

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved OpenVPN
    22 Posts 3 Posters 2.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      Alejandro.Carbonara
      last edited by

      I checked and was able to run that command, but I was getting "RTNETLINK answers: File exists" as a response.
      To check, I looked at the IP routing tables:

      Kernel IP routing table
      Destination      Gateway          Genmask        Flags    MSS Window  irtt Iface
      default            10.0.2.2            0.0.0.0            UG      0    0          0 eth0
      10.0.2.0          0.0.0.0            255.255.255.0  U        0    0          0 eth0
      192.168.57.0    0.0.0.0            255.255.255.0  U        0    0          0 eth1
      192.168.58.0    192.168.80.1    255.255.255.0  UG      0    0          0 tun0
      192.168.80.0    0.0.0.0            255.255.255.0  U        0    0          0 tun0

      (Note that due to this being on vagrant, the first gateway is used to provision the machine.)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • V
        viragomann
        last edited by

        So the necessary route is set fine as the routing table shows.
        Has it been already set before you were running that command?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A
          Alejandro.Carbonara
          last edited by

          The route was set before running the command.

          I've started and stopped the openVPN client several times on the machine, so it may have been set earlier.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • johnpozJ
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
            last edited by

            "192.168.57.0    0.0.0.0            255.255.255.0  U        0    0          0 eth1"

            That route is not going down your tunnel.. So how would you expect to get their through the tunnel.. Seems your client is trying to go out eth1 to get there.  With no gateway so it thinks that network is on its eth1 interface.

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • V
              viragomann
              last edited by

              I think, that's just the way how his OS prints networks connected directly to an interface. The line has only an U-flag, no G for a gateway.
              It the same as
              10.0.2.0          0.0.0.0            255.255.255.0  U        0    0          0 eth0

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • V
                viragomann
                last edited by

                Now, as the route is set as it should be, why do you think, you have a routing problem?

                Try to ping pfSense internal address and see if you get a response.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A
                  Alejandro.Carbonara
                  last edited by

                  As of now, I can ping the internal ip of pfsense and get a positive response.

                  Attempting to ping the internal machine gets me no response whatsoever.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • V
                    viragomann
                    last edited by

                    Check the firewall of the internal machine.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A
                      Alejandro.Carbonara
                      last edited by

                      The target machine is an ubuntu server VM.

                      sudo ufw status
                      Status: inactive

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • V
                        viragomann
                        last edited by

                        And its default gateway is set to 192.168.58.2 (the pfSense internal address)?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • johnpozJ
                          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                          last edited by

                          Oh my bad.. I was reading that you wanted to get to 192.168.57… ooops..

                          If you can ping the internal IP address of pfsense then your tunnel is up and routing that network down the tunnel.  Not being able to get to the machine on the network behind pfsense points to problem on the machine.  As viragomann pointed out host firewall and or wrong gateway on the host not pointing back to pfsense are 2 very common problems.

                          Just because ufw is not running does not mean for example iptables is not running.. I run iptables on my ubuntu vms not ufw..

                          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A
                            Alejandro.Carbonara
                            last edited by

                            The routing table on the internal machine looks like:

                            Kernel IP routing table
                            Destination    Gateway        Genmask        Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
                            default        10.0.2.2        0.0.0.0        UG    0      0        0 eth0
                            10.0.2.0        *              255.255.255.0  U    0      0        0 eth0
                            192.168.58.0    *              255.255.255.0  U    0      0        0 eth1

                            Also, I checked and iptables is all accept rules.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • johnpozJ
                              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                              last edited by

                              Well how is that going to work??

                              Your sending unknown networks out 10.0.2.2

                              So how exactly would it get to the vpn clients ip on 192.168.80.0/24

                              Your going to have to create a host route on this machine pointing 192.168.80.0/24 to the 192.168.58 IP of pfsense.

                              Or you would have to source nat your vpn clients to look like they are coming from the 192.168.58 IP of pfsense so your host there knows how to talk to it.

                              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • A
                                Alejandro.Carbonara
                                last edited by

                                I was able to resolve the problem! There was some weirdness going on because I had set up the machine on an internal network.

                                johnpoz was right, in that the problem was in the routing table of the internal machine. Once I fixed the internal machine to use the firewall as a gateway, I was able to VPN to it from the external machine.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.