Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    2.4 RC vs 2.4.1 - features, experience etc

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.4 Development Snapshots
    13 Posts 10 Posters 3.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jimpJ
      jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
      last edited by

      At the moment the only difference, aside from some build/meta info, is the FreeBSD base. There were a lot of changes in FreeBSD 11.1 that need testing separately. I've run some preliminary tests with IPsec and it's been OK, that was our largest concern.

      Once 2.4-RELEASE drops, then things will (slowly) start to differ as things get added/fixed/etc. 2.4.1 will not be all that different from 2.4.0 except for the base and, in all likelihood, fixes for issues discovered in 2.4 after release and more people use it. There are a couple extra things we want to bring in but nothing huge. ETA for 2.4.1 is targeted as ~30 days after 2.4.0 due to FreeBSD making 11.0 go EOL in that timeframe.

      Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

      Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

      Do not Chat/PM for help!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • occamsrazorO
        occamsrazor
        last edited by

        Thank you all for the useful information, think I will stay on the 2.4 for now.

        pfSense CE on Qotom Q355G4 8GB RAM/60GB SSD
        Ubiquiti Unifi wired and wireless network, APC UPSs
        Mac OSX and IOS devices, QNAP NAS

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H
          Hugovsky
          last edited by

          I'm using 2.4.1 with 3 ipsec tunnels and 1 roadwarrior and it's been fine so far. I'm using a supermicro asri2558 board with 16GB and 100/100 FO connection.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B
            beatvjiking
            last edited by

            One thing I did notice, and can't really explain, was that the web interface is much snappier in 2.4.1 than 2.4RC. I was able to reproduce this on two otherwise identically configured SG-2220 units. I know it's just the base that changed between the two so I don't know why it is, but, doing the same tasks on each in two separate tabs, the interface loaded and responded more quickly in 2.4.1 for me. Not that it was a slouch before, but it was a big enough difference to be noticeable.

            I've had zero stability issues on 2.4.1 besides a GUI crash loading the IPSec dashboard widget when there were no IPSec tunnels configured. Removing it fixed the issue. Throughput and actual firewall stability have been rock solid on both, but my configs aren't terribly adventurous either.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • I
              IceM4n
              last edited by

              I had a boot error after upgrading to v2.4.1 running on Hyper-V; I deleted the virtual CD-ROM and then it booted up fine.

              I would agree that the interface is much faster then before.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                dcol Banned
                last edited by

                Will there be an update path to 2.4.1 from 2.4 at some point, or will it have to be a fresh install.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • jimpJ
                  jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                  last edited by

                  You can always move forward, going to 2.4.1 from 2.4.0 will be a regular, simple upgrade.

                  Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                  Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                  Do not Chat/PM for help!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • valnarV
                    valnar
                    last edited by

                    I was on a build of 2.41 and now that I see 2.40 is FreeBSD 11.1, can I take that config and apply to a fresh build of 2.40RC?ย  Or is that a problem?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • dragoangelD
                      dragoangel
                      last edited by

                      can I safely delete file:

                      cat /boot/loader.conf.local
                      set kern.vty=sc
                      ```after upgrade to 2.4.1? I read that issues with VMware in FreeBSD kerner was fixed.

                      Latest stable pfSense on 2x XG-7100 and 1x Intel Xeon Server, running mutiWAN, he.net IPv6, pfBlockerNG-devel, HAProxy-devel, Syslog-ng, Zabbix-agent, OpenVPN, IPsec site-to-site, DNS-over-TLS...
                      Unifi AP-AC-LR with EAP RADIUS, US-24

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • jimpJ
                        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                        last edited by

                        Yes, that line can be removed

                        Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                        Do not Chat/PM for help!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.