Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Openvpn site to site rules

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved OpenVPN
    12 Posts 3 Posters 1.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      choko
      last edited by

      Dec 26 14:13:03 openvpn[9340]: /usr/local/sbin/ovpn-linkdown ovpnc1 1500 1560 10.10.11.2 10.10.11.1 init
      Dec 26 14:13:03 openvpn[9340]: SIGTERM[hard,] received, process exiting
      Dec 26 14:13:03 openvpn[88055]: OpenVPN 2.3.8 i386-portbld-freebsd10.1 [SSL (OpenSSL)] [LZO] [MH] [IPv6] built on Aug 21 2015
      Dec 26 14:13:03 openvpn[88055]: library versions: OpenSSL 1.0.1l-freebsd 15 Jan 2015, LZO 2.09
      Dec 26 14:13:03 openvpn[88207]: NOTE: the current –script-security setting may allow this configuration to call user-defined scripts
      Dec 26 14:13:04 openvpn[88207]: TUN/TAP device ovpnc1 exists previously, keep at program end
      Dec 26 14:13:04 openvpn[88207]: TUN/TAP device /dev/tun1 opened
      Dec 26 14:13:04 openvpn[88207]: do_ifconfig, tt->ipv6=1, tt->did_ifconfig_ipv6_setup=0
      Dec 26 14:13:04 openvpn[88207]: /sbin/ifconfig ovpnc1 10.10.11.2 10.10.11.1 mtu 1500 netmask 255.255.255.255 up
      Dec 26 14:13:04 openvpn[88207]: /usr/local/sbin/ovpn-linkup ovpnc1 1500 1560 10.10.11.2 10.10.11.1 init
      Dec 26 14:13:04 openvpn[88207]: UDPv4 link local (bound): [AF_INET]192.168.1.241
      Dec 26 14:13:04 openvpn[88207]: UDPv4 link remote: [AF_INET]x.x.x.x:8888

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • V
        viragomann
        last edited by

        Your client and server settings may not match. The server IP is 10.10.10.1, the clients IP is 10.10.11.2.

        Set the tunnel mask on server to /30. On the client you could leave the tunnel field blank. The address is supplied by the server.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C
          choko
          last edited by

          i just applied this but nothing is changed

          server log
          Dec 26 14:39:07 openvpn[73428]: /usr/local/sbin/ovpn-linkdown ovpns1 1500 1560 10.10.10.1 10.10.10.2 init
          Dec 26 14:39:07 openvpn[73428]: SIGTERM[hard,] received, process exiting
          Dec 26 14:39:08 openvpn[45035]: OpenVPN 2.3.8 i386-portbld-freebsd10.1 [SSL (OpenSSL)] [LZO] [MH] [IPv6] built on Aug 21 2015
          Dec 26 14:39:08 openvpn[45035]: library versions: OpenSSL 1.0.1l-freebsd 15 Jan 2015, LZO 2.09
          Dec 26 14:39:08 openvpn[45105]: NOTE: the current –script-security setting may allow this configuration to call user-defined scripts
          Dec 26 14:39:08 openvpn[45105]: TUN/TAP device ovpns1 exists previously, keep at program end
          Dec 26 14:39:08 openvpn[45105]: TUN/TAP device /dev/tun1 opened
          Dec 26 14:39:08 openvpn[45105]: do_ifconfig, tt->ipv6=1, tt->did_ifconfig_ipv6_setup=0
          Dec 26 14:39:08 openvpn[45105]: /sbin/ifconfig ovpns1 10.10.10.1 10.10.10.2 mtu 1500 netmask 255.255.255.255 up
          Dec 26 14:39:08 openvpn[45105]: /usr/local/sbin/ovpn-linkup ovpns1 1500 1560 10.10.10.1 10.10.10.2 init
          Dec 26 14:39:08 openvpn[45105]: UDPv4 link local (bound): [AF_INET]192.168.2.241:8888
          Dec 26 14:39:08 openvpn[45105]: UDPv4 link remote: [undef]

          client log
          Dec 26 14:37:14 openvpn[73590]: /usr/local/sbin/ovpn-linkdown ovpnc1 1500 1560 init
          Dec 26 14:37:14 openvpn[73590]: SIGTERM[hard,] received, process exiting
          Dec 26 14:37:15 openvpn[8954]: OpenVPN 2.3.8 i386-portbld-freebsd10.1 [SSL (OpenSSL)] [LZO] [MH] [IPv6] built on Aug 21 2015
          Dec 26 14:37:15 openvpn[8954]: library versions: OpenSSL 1.0.1l-freebsd 15 Jan 2015, LZO 2.09
          Dec 26 14:37:15 openvpn[9140]: NOTE: the current –script-security setting may allow this configuration to call user-defined scripts
          Dec 26 14:37:15 openvpn[9140]: OpenVPN ROUTE: OpenVPN needs a gateway parameter for a –route option and no default was specified by either --route-gateway or --ifconfig options
          Dec 26 14:37:15 openvpn[9140]: OpenVPN ROUTE: failed to parse/resolve route for host/network: 192.168.2.0
          Dec 26 14:37:15 openvpn[9140]: TUN/TAP device ovpnc1 exists previously, keep at program end
          Dec 26 14:37:15 openvpn[9140]: TUN/TAP device /dev/tun1 opened
          Dec 26 14:37:15 openvpn[9140]: /usr/local/sbin/ovpn-linkup ovpnc1 1500 1560 init
          Dec 26 14:37:15 openvpn[9140]: UDPv4 link local (bound): [AF_INET]192.168.1.241
          Dec 26 14:37:15 openvpn[9140]: UDPv4 link remote: [AF_INET]x.x.x.x:8888

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DerelictD
            Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
            last edited by

            You must supply the tunnel networks on both sides with a /30 (point-to-point mode).

            Set them both to 10.10.10.0/30. The server will use .1, the client .2.

            There is nothing in those logs indicating a connection attempt is even occurring. The client isn't properly loading at all.

            OpenVPN 2.3.8 i386-portbld-freebsd10.1 [SSL (OpenSSL)] [LZO] [MH] [IPv6] built on Aug 21 2015

            Why such an ancient version?

            Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
            A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
            DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
            Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              choko
              last edited by

              i use an old version 2.2.6 because i think its the most stable version,i  plan to use traffic shaper later .an i see in the bug tracker that in the 2.4 traffic shaper dont work at all,many problem with it. so i prefer to use an old stable version. i have a basic use anyway.

              i set ip like you tell me,but same issue.
              my 2 pfsense are behind a modem and i forward 8888 udp port on every modem . can this be the cause ??
              before use this topology i see in the internet that pfsense can work behind modem .
              i cant set pfsense on pppoe because there is no place to put the vlan id of the ISP  (ipmsan topology) so i am obliged to have pfsense behind modem.
              but i same tuto i see that is working well ,and that work even with ddns service if not static public ip.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                choko
                last edited by

                this is haw i want to make my vpn .normally its possible a topologie like this ,it work i hope  :(

                openvpn.jpg
                openvpn.jpg_thumb

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DerelictD
                  Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                  last edited by

                  OK well I am not going to spend a bunch of time troubleshooting 2.2.6 with you. Sorry.

                  Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                  A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                  DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                  Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • C
                    choko
                    last edited by

                    ok,thanks for help anyway, but can you tell me with what recent stable version can i do that

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DerelictD
                      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                      last edited by

                      2.4.2_1. If your hardware is 32-bit-only then 2.3.5_1.

                      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        choko
                        last edited by

                        thank you for the help :)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.