Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    DNS leaks using OpenVPN client tunnel

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved OpenVPN
    69 Posts 7 Posters 25.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      strangegopher
      last edited by

      to fix dns leaks, i didn't do anything fancy, just set the dns servers under dhcp settings to be google dns. simple and it works.

      I am also blocking any access to dns server on the firewall

      https://www.dnsleaktest.com/

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • G
        gschmidt
        last edited by

        @strangegopher:

        to fix dns leaks, i didn't do anything fancy, just set the dns servers under dhcp settings to be google dns. simple and it works.

        I am also blocking any access to dns server on the firewall

        https://www.dnsleaktest.com/

        I made the port forward NAT rule…this does not leak my IPS provider, but all Google and OpenDNS servers...and I didn't even specify OpenDNS in pfsense

        So if you perform a dnsleaktest, you only see the dns server of your VPN provider?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DerelictD
          Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
          last edited by

          @strangegopher:

          to fix dns leaks, i didn't do anything fancy, just set the dns servers under dhcp settings to be google dns. simple and it works.

          I am also blocking any access to dns server on the firewall

          https://www.dnsleaktest.com/

          This is all you need to do. DNS queries will be policy routed out the VPN just like all the other traffic.

          Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
          A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
          DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
          Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            strangegopher
            last edited by

            @gschmidt:

            @strangegopher:

            to fix dns leaks, i didn't do anything fancy, just set the dns servers under dhcp settings to be google dns. simple and it works.

            I am also blocking any access to dns server on the firewall

            https://www.dnsleaktest.com/

            I made the port forward NAT rule…this does not leak my IPS provider, but all Google and OpenDNS servers...and I didn't even specify OpenDNS in pfsense

            So if you perform a dnsleaktest, you only see the dns server of your VPN provider?

            Purpose of dns leak test is to find out your real ip address even if your are behind a vpn. If there is no dns leak then you should see ip address of your vpn provider instead of your real ip address.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • G
              gschmidt
              last edited by

              Thanx for helping, this a struggle for me for 2 weeks now.

              I understand the leak testing. I already used the test site you linked me, this is why i noticed the leaks.
              The problem is with my current settings the dnsleaktest site returns all Google and OpenDNS servers.
              Not my ISP ip-address and also not my VPN provider DNS server.

              There are many threads and tutorials about "route network clients policy based through a OpenVPN Client tunnel"
              For my current setup I used (a combination of) the tutorials:
              https://www.techhelpguides.com/2017/06/12/ultimate-pfsense-openvpn-guide/
              https://www.infotechwerx.com/blog/Creating-pfSense-Connection-VPNBook

              Now the first tutorial describes DNS leak prevention at "Step 11", which are 2 methods.
              Method 1 (my current setup), but this leaks what I describe at the beginning of this reply
              Method 2 is working correctly, however all other network clients (which are not meant to go through the openvpn client gateway), also use the DNS server of my VPN provider  because in the DNS resolver only the EXPRESSVPN gateway is selected for outgoing interfaces. As soon as i multi select EXPRESSVPN, LAN or WAN my ISP ip-address is leaking.

              Now your answer looks so simple:

              I have specified the Google servers at System/General Setup/DNS Server Settings
              I have made static DHCP mappings for the network clients that need to go through the OpenVPN Gateway i have created.
              I have made a firewall alias for those static mappings
              I get the idea of Derelict to fill the vpn provider DNS servers on the static DHCP mappings

              Now this one "I am also blocking any access to dns server on the firewall", the picture you attached shows that (selected) rule I guess?
              A firewall rule on the LAN i guess?
              what I see is an alias of all RFC 1918 ipv4 private networks, but I can't see the Destination port and gateway…is this any?

              Besides that...I have a firewall rule on the LAN, which sends the static DHCP mappings (as an alias) through the VPN Client Gateway (EXPRESSVPN)
              The other one is the NAT redirection to the DNS servers of my VPN provider (DNS leak prevention method 1)
              The rest of the rules are default from pfSense 2.4.2 installation

              above or under which rule should your "I am also blocking any access to dns server on the firewall" rule be located?

              ![LAN Firewall Rules .JPG](/public/imported_attachments/1/LAN Firewall Rules .JPG)
              ![LAN Firewall Rules .JPG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/LAN Firewall Rules .JPG_thumb)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DerelictD
                Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                last edited by

                That second rule will never match because the traffic will be matched by the any rule above it and policy routed out the VPN.

                Note the 0/0 counters there.

                Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • G
                  gschmidt
                  last edited by

                  Right!…I changed the order...but still...leaking Google and OpenDNS (which i did not specify anywhere in pfsense)

                  NAT-02.jpg = NAT Redirection of ExpressVPN DNS servers

                  Result= dnsleaktest.jpg

                  NAT-rule-01.JPG
                  NAT-rule-01.JPG_thumb
                  NAT-rule-02.JPG
                  NAT-rule-02.JPG_thumb
                  dnsleaktest.JPG
                  dnsleaktest.JPG_thumb

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DerelictD
                    Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                    last edited by

                    WHAT DNS SERVERS ARE YOUR CLIENTS SET TO USE?

                    DNS is NOT this hard, people.

                    With your rules like that, the express_vpn_dns servers will be queried using the default gateway, NOT the VPN, unless you have redirect gateway for the VPN itself.

                    Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                    A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                    DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                    Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      strangegopher
                      last edited by

                      @gschmidt:

                      I have specified the Google servers at System/General Setup/DNS Server Settings

                      No need to do this as unbound by default uses root servers for dns, so no need for dns forwarding.
                      If you want you can remove all the dns servers from this section and dns will still work.

                      above or under which rule should your "I am also blocking any access to dns server on the firewall" rule be located?

                      Sorry I posted the wrong image.
                      This is what the dns rule should look like:
                      (above all other rules in your case [except anti-lockout])
                      Action: Block
                      Protocol: IPv4 TCP/UDP
                      Source: ExpressVPN_Hosts
                      Src Port: Any
                      Destination: This Firewall
                      Dst Port: 53 (DNS)

                      That will block access to firewall's dns server.

                      Now you will have to to do to is go to:
                      Services/DHCP Server/LAN
                      and Under DNS Servers add dns server of your choice (like google dns).

                      Also like Derelict mentioned you can remove the 2nd rule of NAT redirection to expressvpn.
                      And any other port forwarding rules u created under Firewall -> Nat.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • G
                        gschmidt
                        last edited by

                        On the static DHCP mappings in pfSense (which is my main router): Empty
                        On client 1 (Window 10 PC): automatically (which is the gateway 192.168.1.1)
                        On client 2 (linux device): 192.168.1.1

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S
                          strangegopher
                          last edited by

                          Do you not see this under Services/DHCP Server/LAN?

                          Capture.PNG
                          Capture.PNG_thumb

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DerelictD
                            Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                            last edited by

                            That DOES NOT MEAN that you do not have static DNS servers on the client you are testing, bro.

                            This really is. not. that. hard.

                            Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                            A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                            DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                            Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • G
                              gschmidt
                              last edited by

                              Ok….I have created the rule =Block rule.jpg
                              Added the google dns servers = "DHCP Server DNS Server.jpg"
                              and the ExpressVPN DNS servers = Static DHCP Mapping.jpg"

                              dnsleaktest result= dnsleaktest.jpg

                              :o

                              ![Block Rule.JPG](/public/imported_attachments/1/Block Rule.JPG)
                              ![Block Rule.JPG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Block Rule.JPG_thumb)
                              ![DHCP Server DNS Server.JPG](/public/imported_attachments/1/DHCP Server DNS Server.JPG)
                              ![DHCP Server DNS Server.JPG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/DHCP Server DNS Server.JPG_thumb)
                              ![Static DHCP Mapping.JPG](/public/imported_attachments/1/Static DHCP Mapping.JPG)
                              ![Static DHCP Mapping.JPG_thumb](/public/imported_attachments/1/Static DHCP Mapping.JPG_thumb)
                              dnsleaktest.JPG
                              dnsleaktest.JPG_thumb

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • G
                                gschmidt
                                last edited by

                                I did an nslookup at the client W10 PC
                                Which shows the DNS server of ExpressVPN
                                Which I entered in the Static Mapping DNS servers in pfSense

                                nslookup.JPG
                                nslookup.JPG_thumb

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • S
                                  strangegopher
                                  last edited by

                                  try removing the ExpressVPN DNS servers from Static DHCP Mapping and replacing it with 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • DerelictD
                                    Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                                    last edited by

                                    It doesn't matter where anything is configured. What are the DNS servers configured on the client. Use ipconfig /all

                                    Hell, if you're having this much trouble, configure them statically.

                                    Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                                    A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                                    DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                                    Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • G
                                      gschmidt
                                      last edited by

                                      ipconfig /all

                                      I dont see static dns servers?
                                      Only the express vpn dns servers i have specified in pfsense

                                      ipconfig-all.JPG
                                      ipconfig-all.JPG_thumb

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • S
                                        strangegopher
                                        last edited by

                                        my guess is expressvpn dns servers might be the issue, so try using 8.8.8.8 in windows go to Control Panel\Network and Internet\Network Connections right click your interface, select properties, double click "Internet Protocol Version 4", select "Use Following DNS server addresses" and enter 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4

                                        and run dns leak test again

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • G
                                          gschmidt
                                          last edited by

                                          @strangegopher:

                                          try removing the ExpressVPN DNS servers from Static DHCP Mapping and replacing it with 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4

                                          Check!…Still leaking Google and openDNS servers....looks exact the same as with the NAT redirection of port 53
                                          I just did a default pfsense 2.4.2 setup (update to 2.4.3), nothing special

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • S
                                            strangegopher
                                            last edited by

                                            Well I am out of ideas then. I don't know what could be going wrong.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.