Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    pfBlockerNG-devel feedback

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfBlockerNG
    102 Posts 26 Posters 100.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • GrimsonG
      Grimson Banned
      last edited by

      Works fine, the only issue so far is a cosmetic issue where the links to the EasyList feeds are shown wrong (it downloads the correct feeds, so it's only the UI), some examples:

      0_1534841139188_UIBug1.png

      0_1534841261338_UIBug2.png

      BBcan177B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D
        dma_pf @JasonAU
        last edited by

        @jasonau said in pfBlockerNG-devel feedback:

        Zero issues for me running it on my home prod environment and loving the new features, I think from a code/stability POV I'm very happy with it.

        The only thing I can think of is we need a good KB/reference material on how to do some things with it, I know we have these forums but it can be hard to find your problem or questions sometimes, personally I learn best from Youtube videos

        I concur with Jason's comments. Just upgraded from pfBlockerNG 2.1.2_3 to pfBlockerNG-devel 2.2.1 on a pfSense 2.4.3 Release -P1 (amd64) box with no issues. I'm running multiple openvpn connections and a site-to-site tunnel and everything worked smoothly right after the upgrade.

        I would also like some more concise reference material on how it all works. I know that we have this forum and I have learned a lot from it. But there is certainly a steep learning curve.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          konawolv
          last edited by

          I have been very satisfied with pfBlockerNG-devel. The only issues i had were cert issues with downloading feed updates which caused my cron jobs to act funny. However, i dug around some posts and found your recommendation to change those feeds to "FLEX" and that seemed to have fixed the problem.

          Otherwise, its been great. Ads dont get blocked get blocked on androids and on the ipad, but they still play. I think this has something to do with the way that apps distribute ads on those platforms.

          The usability of devel has been great. Also recently updated to 2.2.5_9 with no issues that i have seen.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • B
            bartkowski
            last edited by

            Overall very happy, no issues that I could see.

            But I just got this error while looking at log files.

            PHP ERROR: Type: 1, File: /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_log.php, Line: 192, Message: Allowed memory size of 536870912 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 129 bytes) @ 2018-08-21 11:23:59

            BBcan177B RonpfSR 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • BBcan177B
              BBcan177 Moderator @Grimson
              last edited by

              @grimson that was fixed early on. You must have been an early tester and created those easylist entries with the old code. You could try a "save" in the Easylist Tab to see if that repairs those entries.

              "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

              Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
              Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
              Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

              GrimsonG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • BBcan177B
                BBcan177 Moderator @bartkowski
                last edited by

                @bartkowski that could happen if you attempt to view a very large log file and it exhausted the browser/php memory trying to load that log file.

                "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • GrimsonG
                  Grimson Banned @BBcan177
                  last edited by

                  @bbcan177 said in pfBlockerNG-devel feedback:

                  @grimson that was fixed early on. You must have been an early tester and created those easylist entries with the old code. You could try a "save" in the Easylist Tab to see if that repairs those entries.

                  No, a save does mix them up differently but they still don't match.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • RonpfSR
                    RonpfS @bartkowski
                    last edited by RonpfS

                    @bartkowski You could try to increase the "memory_limit" settings in /etc/inc/config.inc. This change will be lost when you upgrade pfsense as it installs the defaut config.inc.

                    // Set memory limit to 512M on amd64.
                    if ($ARCH == "amd64") {
                    	ini_set("memory_limit", "512M");
                    } else {
                    	ini_set("memory_limit", "128M");
                    }
                    

                    You can also the limit the size of pfblocker log files in pfBlockerNG / General Tab / Log Settings .

                    2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                    Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
                    Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

                    B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • B
                      bartkowski @RonpfS
                      last edited by bartkowski

                      @ronpfs I'm running the SG-2440 with stock RAM. I'll give this a try.

                      Edit: My config.inc file shows the same memory limits.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • GrimsonG
                        Grimson Banned
                        last edited by Grimson

                        Ok, I did a fresh install (removed previous package and cleaned out any remaining files in /tmp) of pfBlockerNG-devel version 2.2.5_10 on pfSense 2.4.3p1.

                        On the first visit of the EasyList feeds page everything is fine. Then I enabled EasyList, EasyPrivacy and Easylist German with all of their content, set Action to Unbound and saved the settings. Now the feed URLs in the UI are mixed up again. I'm using Firefox 61.0.2 but I see the same in IE. They do show fine in the config.xml, so I guess something gets mixed up when reading/interpreting the config for the UI:

                        0_1535117945591_easylist_config.txt

                        BBcan177B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • BBcan177B
                          BBcan177 Moderator @Grimson
                          last edited by

                          @grimson

                          I'm working on a patch for this... I will shoot you a PM if you don't mind testing that when its completed?

                          "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                          Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                          Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                          Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                          GrimsonG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • GrimsonG
                            Grimson Banned @BBcan177
                            last edited by

                            @bbcan177 said in pfBlockerNG-devel feedback:

                            @grimson

                            I'm working on a patch for this... I will shoot you a PM if you don't mind testing that when its completed?

                            Happy to help, I have the System_Patches package installed so providing a patch is probably the easiest way to test the fix.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • BBcan177B
                              BBcan177 Moderator
                              last edited by

                              @grimson said in pfBlockerNG-devel feedback:

                              Happy to help, I have the System_Patches package installed so providing a patch is probably the easiest way to test the fix.

                              @Grimson, its just as easy to download the two patched files below. Let me know how it goes.

                              fetch -o /usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.inc "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BBcan177/FreeBSD-ports/patch-1/net/pfSense-pkg-pfBlockerNG-devel/files/usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.inc"
                              
                              fetch -o /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_category_edit.php "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BBcan177/FreeBSD-ports/patch-1/net/pfSense-pkg-pfBlockerNG-devel/files/usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_category_edit.php"
                              

                              "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                              Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                              Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                              Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • GrimsonG
                                Grimson Banned
                                last edited by

                                Looks good, I couldn't reproduce the issue anymore. Thanks.

                                BBcan177B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • BBcan177B
                                  BBcan177 Moderator @Grimson
                                  last edited by

                                  @grimson said in pfBlockerNG-devel feedback:

                                  Looks good, I couldn't reproduce the issue anymore. Thanks

                                  Great. Thanks for testing. There are a bunch of changes in the next pull request:

                                  https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-ports/pull/559

                                  "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                                  Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                                  Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                                  Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • L
                                    lordbob75
                                    last edited by

                                    I did not notice for a while, but it looks like ever since I upgraded to this version the DNSBL has been crashing and restarting every minute, along with the service watchdog.

                                    I've also got the out of sync error, but I've force reloaded a bunch of times and the log just says DNSBL is out of sync. Not sure what to look for in it.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • RonpfSR
                                      RonpfS
                                      last edited by RonpfS

                                      There is no need to place DNSBL under the System Watchdog.

                                      You need to post the log of a Force Reload All if you want to get help.

                                      One thing that can generate Out of Sync warnings is if you have Header/Label that are not unique.

                                      2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                                      Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
                                      Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

                                      L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • L
                                        lordbob75 @RonpfS
                                        last edited by

                                        @ronpfs ah, well then that should fix that part.

                                        I've attached the log to this post.
                                        0_1535239826092_pfblockerng.zip

                                        RonpfSR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • RonpfSR
                                          RonpfS @lordbob75
                                          last edited by

                                          @lordbob75

                                          *** DNSBL update [ 850567 ] [ 824258 ] ... OUT OF SYNC ! *** [ 08/25/18 16:04:06 ]
                                          
                                          

                                          850567 - 824258 = 26309

                                          Searching for 26309 show that you load twice Malware_Domains

                                          
                                          [ Malware_Domains ]		 Reload [ 08/25/18 15:58:47 ] . completed ..
                                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Orig.    Unique     # Dups     # White    # TOP1M    Final                
                                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            26446    26446      137        0          0          26309                
                                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          
                                          
                                          [ Malware_Domains ]		 Reload [ 08/25/18 15:59:21 ] . completed ..
                                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Orig.    Unique     # Dups     # White    # TOP1M    Final                
                                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            26446    26446      137        0          0          26309                
                                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          

                                          2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                                          Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
                                          Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

                                          L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • L
                                            lordbob75 @RonpfS
                                            last edited by

                                            @ronpfs Awesome, thanks. I'll fix it. I'm not sure I understand how the number searched worked though. I'm not sure how to explain what I don't get about it.

                                               26309 /var/db/pfblockerng/dnsbl/Malware_Domains.txt
                                            

                                            In that list, is that number like the start of where that list adds to the master list or something? If that makes sense?

                                            RonpfSR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.