Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PfBlockerNG v2.0 w/DNSBL

    pfBlockerNG
    192
    1.1k
    1.6m
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H
      heliop100
      last edited by

      Bingo

      I find it on: /var/db/pfblockerng/deny/IBlock_Proxy.txt:5.9.110.236exi

      But I have one server communicating on port 123 with that IP, believe are one NTP server.

      Why are not blocking it?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • H
        Hugovsky
        last edited by

        I'm having problems with iOS 11.3 BETA. It seems that safari can't go to 0.0.0.0 and pages can't load. Solution was to reinstall package and use the VIP address, as I was using the certificate hack and 0.0.0.0.

        EDIT: Sorry, wrong version. I'm on 2.1.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • xanaroX
          xanaro
          last edited by

          earlier this month 1.1.1.1 (DNS server) was announced.
          I noticed I can use their backup server 1.0.0.1 but cannot use 1.1.1.1

          I have read that it is because of pfblockerNG, I tried the suggested edit from shell

          https://www.reddit.com/r/PFSENSE/comments/88wg6g/issue_with_pfblockerng_dnsbl_and_cloudflares_1111/

          sed -i '' 's/1.1.1.1/1.1.1.2/g' /usr/local/pkg/pfblockerng/pfblockerng.sh

          but it does not seem to have worked, any help is appreciated.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • RonpfSR
            RonpfS
            last edited by

            You have to do a Force Reload All when you change this IP.

            2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
            Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
            Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M
              Maxburn
              last edited by

              Did charting make it into this release? I can't seem to find it.

              https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=144733.msg787832#msg787832

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • E
                Escorpiom
                last edited by

                I've just set this up, and the blocker is indeed very effective!
                At the moment I'm using the DNSBL part only but so far it's impressive.

                The only thing missing at the moment is the DNS blocking for IPv6 content. For example on Youtube.
                As I understand this would be a new future for the upcoming 3.0 release, if so then I'm eager to try it out.

                Thanks for your work on pfBlockerNG and your support, it's a must have for PfSense.

                Cheers.

                Edit:
                I should have posted this in the pfBlockerNG 2.1 topic, that's the actual version installed on my pfsense box.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • L
                  labradorg13
                  last edited by

                  Hi do you have any guide or tutorial for the new version of pfblockerng w/ dnsbl.
                  Kindly please share.

                  Thanks

                  pfSenseTestP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • pfSenseTestP
                    pfSenseTest @labradorg13
                    last edited by

                    @labradorg13 https://www.linuxincluded.com/block-ads-malvertising-on-pfsense-using-pfblockerng-dnsbl/

                    2x SG-5100 | MBT-4220 (retired) | SG-1000 (retired)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      SashaZt
                      last edited by

                      Fatal error: Call to undefined function pfb_alerts_default_page() in /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_general.php on line 96 PHP ERROR: Type: 1, File: /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_general.php, Line: 96, Message: Call to undefined function pfb_alerts_default_page()
                      Help???

                      BBcan177B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • BBcan177B
                        BBcan177 Moderator @SashaZt
                        last edited by

                        @sashazt said in PfBlockerNG v2.0 w/DNSBL:

                        Fatal error: Call to undefined function pfb_alerts_default_page() in /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_general.php on line 96 PHP ERROR: Type: 1, File: /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_general.php, Line: 96, Message: Call to undefined function pfb_alerts_default_page()
                        Help???

                        Strange error... Looks like it didn't install properly... Do you have enough hard drive space? Try to remove/reinstall the package.

                        "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                        Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                        Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                        Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • O
                          Overloader
                          last edited by

                          It looks like a PHP Opcache issue. Simply reboot pfsense after upgrade. Then it works.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • BBcan177B
                            BBcan177 Moderator @SashaZt
                            last edited by

                            @sashazt said in PfBlockerNG v2.0 w/DNSBL:

                            Fatal error: Call to undefined function pfb_alerts_default_page() in /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_general.php on line 96 PHP ERROR: Type: 1, File: /usr/local/www/pfblockerng/pfblockerng_general.php, Line: 96, Message: Call to undefined function pfb_alerts_default_page()

                            Can you confirm if you are on pfSense 2.4.3? or 2.4.4?

                            Also did this occur when you upgraded pfBlockerNG-devel? or was this a new installation of pfBlockerNG-devel?

                            "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                            Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                            Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                            Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                            O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • O
                              Overloader @BBcan177
                              last edited by

                              @bbcan177 I'm running pfsense 2.4.3-RELEASE-p1 and upgraded from pfBlockerNG 2.1.4_9 to 2.2.5_11 (dev). There are no installation errors but it looks like that the PHP files are cached due opcache.

                              $ php -v
                              PHP 5.6.34 (cli) (built: Mar 16 2018 16:55:46) 
                              Copyright (c) 1997-2016 The PHP Group
                              Zend Engine v2.6.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2016 Zend Technologies
                                  with Zend OPcache v7.0.6-dev, Copyright (c) 1999-2016, by Zend Technologies
                                  with Suhosin v0.9.38, Copyright (c) 2007-2015, by SektionEins GmbH
                              
                              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • M
                                MarcoP @Overloader
                                last edited by

                                @overloader is your php using opcache.validate_timestamps=0?
                                If it doesn't opcache should be able to check the modified timestamp and regenerate the cache.


                                I found out a little issue with a feed blocking it's own IP, funny.

                                Info regarding the feed
                                PRI4 - CCT_IP - https[:]//cybercrime-tracker[.]net/fuckerz.php - 213.186.33.3

                                I'll drop an email and report it directly to the list owner, till here easy.


                                However the main gateway is still able to connect and download from that IP.

                                pfSense gateway - pfBlockerNG Reports
                                Sep 4 10:00:47 WIFI pfB_PRI4_v4 (1770006077) 192.168.20.103:44188 213.186.33.3:443 cluster015.ovh.net TCP:S

                                pfSense test box on WIFI vlan - 192.168.20.103 - pfBlockerNG error.log
                                [ pfB_PRI4_v4 - CCT_IP_v4 ] Download FAIL [ 09/04/18 10:00:53 ] Firewall and/or IDS (Legacy mode only) are not blocking download.

                                Inbound interface is WAN

                                • Advanced inbound on OpenPorts alias
                                • Advanced outbound any any - as default
                                • Floating rules deny both directions

                                Outbound interfaces, all including WAN

                                • Advance inbound/outbound as default
                                • Floating rules denying both directions

                                Pinging the IP from WAN correctly fails so pfB rules are working, but why is it still able to download, or is pfBlockerNG able to circumvent it's own block lists.

                                I was only able to found out the feed blocking it's own IP only because I was synching to the client.

                                Cheers

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • gnitingG
                                  gniting
                                  last edited by

                                  I'm looking to get started with PfBlockerNG but am confused as to which version I should get started with, the "dev" version or the stable one? Any pointers on differences between the two will be immensely helpful.

                                  Thanks.

                                  BBcan177B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • BBcan177B
                                    BBcan177 Moderator @gniting
                                    last edited by

                                    @ibbetsion said in PfBlockerNG v2.0 w/DNSBL:

                                    I'm looking to get started with PfBlockerNG but am confused as to which version I should get started with, the "dev" version or the stable one? Any pointers on differences between the two will be immensely helpful.

                                    https://forum.netgate.com/topic/135708/is-pfblockerng-devel-stable

                                    "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it."

                                    Website: http://pfBlockerNG.com
                                    Twitter: @BBcan177  #pfBlockerNG
                                    Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pfBlockerNG/new/

                                    gnitingG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • gnitingG
                                      gniting @BBcan177
                                      last edited by

                                      @bbcan177 said in PfBlockerNG v2.0 w/DNSBL:

                                      @ibbetsion said in PfBlockerNG v2.0 w/DNSBL:

                                      I'm looking to get started with PfBlockerNG but am confused as to which version I should get started with, the "dev" version or the stable one? Any pointers on differences between the two will be immensely helpful.

                                      https://forum.netgate.com/topic/135708/is-pfblockerng-devel-stable

                                      Thank you.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • A
                                        anttechs
                                        last edited by

                                        I love it and it even has the BBC in the list lol
                                        I am I dying to get more Anti corp lists like what you see on filterlist.com because of spying but I get a lot of :

                                        [ pfB_PRI1_v4 - BBC_C2_Agr_v4 ] Download FAIL [ 02/03/19 11:04:34 ] 
                                        [ pfB_PRI1_v4 - Talos_BL_v4 ] Download FAIL [ 02/03/19 11:04:19 ]
                                        [ pfB_PRI1_v4 - CINS_army_v4 ] Download FAIL [ 02/03/19 11:04:02 ]
                                        [ pfB_PRI1_v4 - BBC_C2_v4 ] Download FAIL [ 02/03/19 11:03:46 ]
                                        [ DNSBL_NSA - NSAblocklist1 ] Download FAIL [ 02/03/19 11:03:30 ]
                                        [ DNSBL_facebook - FB2 ] Download FAIL [ 02/03/19 11:03:15 ]

                                        and this

                                        [ BBC_C2_Agr_v4 ] Downloading update . cURL Error: 60
                                        SSL certificate problem: self signed certificate Retry in 5 seconds...
                                        . cURL Error: 60
                                        SSL certificate problem: self signed certificate Retry in 5 seconds...
                                        . cURL Error: 60
                                        SSL certificate problem: self signed certificate Retry in 5 seconds...
                                        .. unknown http status code | 0

                                        [ pfB_PRI1_v4 - BBC_C2_Agr_v4 ] Download FAIL [ 02/03/19 11:04:34 ]
                                        [ osint.bambenekconsulting.com ] Domain listed in DNSBL

                                        The Following List has been REMOVED [ BBC_C2_Agr_v4 ]

                                        and I have no idea if I'm doing something wrong or it's just the site?

                                        or its because it's not in the right format?

                                        But its still going great and so much simpler to use.
                                        Great work.

                                        I do wonder if this is 0.0.0.0 example.com is ok to put as a list?
                                        I could just ake my own list but then they would not get updated.

                                        I want to block all companies like google, apple, Microsoft, NSA Government, and so on.
                                        I just use a paiid vpn to reach the outside world.

                                        Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J1900 @ 1.99GHz
                                        Current: 1992 MHz, Max: 1993 MHz
                                        4 CPUs: 1 package(s) x 4 core(s)
                                        AES-NI CPU Crypto: No
                                        8 Gig RAM
                                        250GB SSD

                                        https://ant-techs.is/ip-blocklists

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • M
                                          MarcoP
                                          last edited by

                                          @anttechs edit filerlist to filterlists ;)

                                          About the failed downloads, if i remember right some list does include other list' IP, so if you have WAN as Outbound interface in pfBlockerNG these IPs are going to be blocked. The same should apply for the SSL error.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • A
                                            anttechs
                                            last edited by

                                            Many thanks ;)
                                            I'm still learning everyday lol
                                            mines on LAN Outbound Firewall Rules reject.
                                            but Wan is set to default

                                            I think I get it

                                            I disabled TLD because I had .com and most of the others in there, I may be going over the top lol

                                            Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J1900 @ 1.99GHz
                                            Current: 1992 MHz, Max: 1993 MHz
                                            4 CPUs: 1 package(s) x 4 core(s)
                                            AES-NI CPU Crypto: No
                                            8 Gig RAM
                                            250GB SSD

                                            https://ant-techs.is/ip-blocklists

                                            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.