Error The requested URL could not be retrieved cant seem to resolve
-
oh doesn't it work and why is it useless these days.. is that because faster internet?
so what would help me or nothing really like i mentioned i was watching youtube videos how proxy server help with windows updates on multiple computers and files you download if the same.. i just trying to maximise my internet connection which is just the slowest option in dsl -
@kom very true. I would agree with kom on this. The reason the youtube videos you are watching on squid are old is because squid was likely more relevant then for caching purposes. I don't think it is going to help you very much in your situation comet.
Also, I'm not familiar with it, but it looks like NordVPN is 3rd party service that creates a VPN connection for individual devices. I assume you must use a client app on each PC or device to connect to the service? Are all your computers individually connecting to NordVPN? If so, I don't see how pfSense, or more specifically squid will be very helpful. If your network has limited speed, a VPN is only going to make it more slow. In fact, if each PC is connecting directly through NordVPN, wouldn't it be impossible for squid to work as a local caching server since all traffic (and web page requests) from each client will go through the encrypted tunnel to NordVPN servers first?
-
i was watching the youtube videos of the old pfsense version
so why isnt squid proxy revleant anymore still not sure??? as for the vpn.. no i have nordvpn setup client on Pfsense so any computer connected on the network is covered... i use OpenVPN client under pfsense OpenVPN so thats how i do the vpn.. so proxy wouldnt help me..so it only helps people with the faster internet connection? -
@comet424 said in Error The requested URL could not be retrieved cant seem to resolve:
so why isnt squid proxy revleant anymore still not sure???
Because the dynamic web is extremely hard to cache these days without you being a master guru at squid refresh patterns and store_ids. When I was running squid with cache at my company, the hit rate was something like 4-7%. That's terrible. Others I spoke to had similar results. It caused problems with Windows Updates, Netflix YouTube and other services. These days I still use it for URL filtering with squidguard but have the cache turned off.
-
KOM is right, for caching purposes I'm getting extremely low hit rates (see below). It's normally not even 1%. The total average is 0.76%. The hit % or hit rate is a measure of how often the cache is being used.
The main reason for the proxy these days is url filtering with squidguard and/or for security with clamav. I personally use it for security, although even that is arguably not very effective. Below is a link of other discussions on this exact topic, so you can get other people's opinion on it.
https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/85181-are-proxy-servers-still-necessary
-
ok ill read article.. so what is dynamic web compared to whatever it was before? ok so i wont use squid proxy.. and what is the url filtering is that to say add that to porn hub so no one can goto that website so i don't want my kids accessing that website...
and what does the squidguard do i seen that as an option.. and what hs the clamav.and another question well 2
1.. with windows you get virus's does pfsense get virus's?
2.. when i was in college back in late 90s we used BlackICE to test your network for security leaks.. whats good now a days.. that tells me pfsense has closed off anything and hackers cant get in etc.. i googled some some didn't work some where out of date.. but how you guys test your network.. and remember i just home use not network company -
So you have 5mbps internet, and you want to run that through a vpn to make it even slower.. Have fun with that.
Dynamic internet vs static means that almost every page you hit these days is dynamically produced on the fly.. Not just static text or images.. So a proxy has a hard time storing information in its cache and then knowing that the the next browser actually wants the same exact stuff vs what the site is dynamically creating which is just slightly different.. So you storing info in the cache is not going to save you much of anything - and could actually slow you done.
Out of the box pfsense blocks ALL inbound unsolicited traffic - so what exactly are you going to test? If your talking about pentesting/security tools or vulnerability scanners.. Say security onion distro or kali these sorts of toolkits are going to come with a HUGE learning curve for your home user.. HUGE!!! Something as simple to use as say nessus home can be overly complex for your typical home user.. But sure you might want to look into that for scanning your local machines for security concerns..
No pfsense is not going to get viruses ;)
Keep in mind that if you want to scan pfsense to validate nothing is open - it has to be done from OUTSIDE your network.. You can not do a valid scan of your wan/internet rules from inside your network. You could only validate your own lan rules.Why do you need to block p0rnhub as example? Do you have teenage boys or something in your home that your wanting to stop from surfing porn? Do they not have phones with data plans? In a home setup I find the use of a proxy of really zero value..
-
Yes, squidguard is the package which allows doing url filtering and it works along with squid. Url filtering is exactly what you said, you can block porn or any other sites you don't want people to access. There are many publicly available lists of sites which are maintained and constantly being updated with known bad url's and IP's. If you use those lists and keep them up to date, then it reduces your chances of getting malware for instance. It is another layer of security. Pfblockerng is another package that does url filtering. That is what I use for url filtering since it's easy to set up and keep the lists updated. Search the forums for those packages if you are interested in learning more on them. I'm sure many of your questions have already been asked and answered.
PfSense runs on FreeBSD. It is an operating system which like any other operating system can be vulnerable to attacks and viruses. I wouldn't worry about that though. You can't think of pfSense like a Windows computer. It's not the same. Your biggest concern like on any network is making sure your users don't do something dumb like go to sites they shouldn't or open email attachments they shouldn't. That is something that you can't control, but security experts try to reduce as much as possible. Right out of the box with default settings, pfSense is already more secure than any commercially available home router. I would suggest you do a lot of searching on these forums and elsewhere to learn more. It took me personally months of searching, trial and error, just to begin to understand what pfSense is capable of.
When you have specific issues and can't find the answers after searching the forums and else, the pfSense community is usually very helpful.
Raffi
-
ah ok all good info i wont bother using the squid then..
as for the porn question i was just using it as a random thing for the question about url filitering.. no teens.. i do have 12 and 9 yr old.. i not worried i was just making a reference..but ok ill check out he other info and ill scrap the squid
and ya 5mps is all you can get in the country.. you cant tap in the fiber in front of my driveway and they only offered on phone line.. unless i lived in town...
thanks for the feed back.. and ill just disabled it..
thank you
-
@comet424 I forgot to mention that the best source for information on pfSense is in the book written by the experts. Recently it has been made free to the public. Even when it was not free, it was worth every penny.
https://www.netgate.com/docs/pfsense/book/Good luck
Raffi
