Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Does TNSR provide an NAT64 server built in?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved TNSR Feedback
    5 Posts 3 Posters 2.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • IsaacFLI
      IsaacFL
      last edited by

      Read thru the documentation and couldn't find anything to indicate one way or the other.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • dennis_sD
        dennis_s
        last edited by

        Hi @IsaacFL,

        TNSR does support two different versions of v4 to v6 translation depending on your needs. The documentation for these 2 versions can be found here:

        Dual-Stack Lite
        MAP

        IsaacFLI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • NotHereDaveN
          NotHereDave Netgate
          last edited by

          Hey @IsaacFL

          Can you fill in a bit more about your NAT64 requirement? As @dennis_s said, TNSR includes DS-Lite and MAP T/E already, but if you have a particular requirement that's not met by those, I'd love to hear about it.

          BTW - I'm w/Netgate too.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • IsaacFLI
            IsaacFL @dennis_s
            last edited by

            @dennis_s
            My case would fall more under v6 to v4. Internal network is ipv6 only with nat64 server used to provide access to external sites that are still ipv4 only. Currently use a NAT64 server but would prefer built into edge server.

            NotHereDaveN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • NotHereDaveN
              NotHereDave Netgate @IsaacFL
              last edited by

              @IsaacFL thanks! We'll certainly consider a simple NAT64 implementation in TNSR.

              Right now, the primary request has been from carriers who need to transit IPv4 traffic across their IPv6 backbone networks. I'm always open to hearing about other uses though. Thanks for the feedback!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.