Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Unable to browse the web

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Firewalling
    30 Posts 5 Posters 2.4k Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T Offline
      Tom8888 @johnpoz
      last edited by

      @johnpoz said in Unable to browse the web:

      well if you turned off NAT, then not sure how you think clients are going to be working.. Since your upstream is not going to nat those - unless you set it up too.

      pfctl -d

      What should i do exactly? (sorry i am not an IT)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • johnpozJ Online
        johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
        last edited by johnpoz

        you shouldn't be running that cmd, if you want pfsense to actually nat, that disable firewall and natting.

        That is not the default gateway for the lan, that is the interface in the lan address.. So yeah that is how it talks to that network.. You didn't set a gateway on the lan interface did you?

        An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
        If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
        Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
        SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

        T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T Offline
          Tom8888 @chpalmer
          last edited by

          @chpalmer said in Unable to browse the web:

          Tom:

          Do a packet capture on your WAN using the diagnostic menu and then repeat the ping attempt from a LAN client.

          These are just a few lines taken out from the middle of the report, i hope is going to get posted and not flagged as a spam....

          16:04:53.151476 IP 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.254: ICMP echo reply, id 18172, seq 16249, length 8
          16:04:53.380004 IP 192.168.1.214.57189 > 192.168.1.254.80: tcp 1
          16:04:53.380038 IP 192.168.1.254.80 > 192.168.1.214.57189: tcp 0
          16:04:53.444004 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.1.254 tell 192.168.1.1, length 46
          16:04:53.444020 ARP, Reply 192.168.1.254 is-at 40:62:31:02:ac:c4, length 28
          16:04:53.682654 IP 192.168.1.254 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id 18172, seq 16250, length 8
          16:04:53.683323 IP 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.254: ICMP echo reply, id 18172, seq 16250, length 8

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • johnpozJ Online
            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
            last edited by

            yeah that pfsense pinging its gateway.

            Now do that sniff when you try and ping from the lan address to 8.8.8.8

            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T Offline
              Tom8888 @johnpoz
              last edited by

              @johnpoz
              No i did not set a default gateway on the LAN, as the guide suggested not to do it as well

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T Offline
                Tom8888
                last edited by

                PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) from 172.16.1.254: 56 data bytes

                --- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
                3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T Offline
                  Tom8888
                  last edited by Tom8888

                  Packet Capture from WAN while pinging 8.8.8.8

                  16:37:23.724824 IP 192.168.1.254 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id 18172, seq 19996, length 8
                  16:37:23.725314 IP 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.254: ICMP echo reply, id 18172, seq 19996, length 8
                  16:37:23.796500 IP 192.168.1.214.59665 > 224.0.0.252.5355: UDP, length 33
                  16:37:23.826400 IP 192.168.1.100.138 > 192.168.1.255.138: UDP, length 201
                  16:37:24.206639 IP 192.168.1.254.123 > 80.211.82.90.123: UDP, length 48
                  16:37:24.206996 IP 192.168.1.214.59665 > 224.0.0.252.5355: UDP, length 33
                  16:37:24.231761 IP 192.168.1.254 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id 18172, seq 19997, length 8
                  16:37:24.232228 IP 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.254: ICMP echo reply, id 18172, seq 19997, length 8
                  16:37:24.262468 IP 80.211.82.90.123 > 192.168.1.254.123: UDP, length 48
                  16:37:24.763824 IP 192.168.1.254 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id 18172, seq 19998, length 8

                  Doing the same test on LAN i just get a blank page (????)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T Offline
                    Tom8888
                    last edited by Tom8888

                    Here is how my different machines are connected to each other:

                    1. i have a main router from where the internet connection is coming from, with 4 LAN ports AND wifi
                    2. a laptop is connected by wifi to this main router and i can control PFSense from this browser
                    3. a LAN wire connect the main router to an old pc, which is hosting a local site not on the web
                    4. a second LAN wire goes to a brand new (powerful) mini pc which has only the last version of PFSense installed
                    5. from the PFSense machine, there is a second LAN wire which goes to an access point, broadcasting a second wifi connection not protected by password

                    If i try to connect with my laptop to the other wifi coming from the AP of PFSense, i can still control PFSense from it, but NOT browse the web.
                    When i enter this command (pfctl -e) into the PFSense Shell (option 8), i can no longer access the control panel of PFSense, but if i insert another command (pfctl -d), then i can again visualize the interface.
                    In both cases i cannot browse the web, unless i connect directly to the main router.
                    If i eliminate the PFSense box and connect the wire from the AP directly to the main router, then even this wifi connection works perfectly.

                    Version 2.4.4-RELEASE-p3 (amd64)
                    built on Wed May 15 18:53:44 EDT 2019
                    FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p10

                    The system is on the latest version.
                    Version information updated at Mon Aug 19 17:38:24 UTC 2019
                    CPU Type Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J3160 @ 1.60GHz
                    Current: 1600 MHz, Max: 1601 MHz
                    4 CPUs: 1 package(s) x 4 core(s)
                    AES-NI CPU Crypto: Yes (inactive)
                    Kernel PTI Enabled
                    Uptime 00 Hour 43 Minutes 15 Seconds
                    Current date/time
                    Mon Aug 19 17:39:02 UTC 2019
                    DNS server(s)

                    127.0.0.1
                    1.1.1.1
                    8.8.8.8
                    
                    chpalmerC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • chpalmerC Offline
                      chpalmer @Tom8888
                      last edited by

                      @Tom8888

                      For that setup you need a WAN rule from 192.168.1.0/24 to "WAN Address" in order to come in from the WAN side the way you are doing it.

                      Triggering snowflakes one by one..
                      Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz on an M400 WG box.

                      T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • T Offline
                        Tom8888 @chpalmer
                        last edited by

                        The problem has been solved, i will post the details but not now as here is 1am, thanks all for your support.

                        T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • T Offline
                          Tom8888 @Tom8888
                          last edited by

                          So, basically, i hired someone on Fiverr.com which after a month of struggles, has been able to do half the job i hired him for, the resolution of this problem i posted here will likely lead us to the final step, which is redirecting all the clients accessing the free wifi to a locally hosted site.
                          The problem was apparently a misconfiguration of the AP, so people could connect to the wifi, get an IP address but unable to navigate anywhere, as only a white page would display and say the connection was taking too long.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • johnpozJ Online
                            johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                            last edited by

                            So your AP was either running a captive portal, or it wasn't actually in AP mode and was trying to route, etc. which was prob the same network on both sides, etc. Its wan and its lan.. So yeah not going anywhere.

                            An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                            If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                            Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                            SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.