• Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
Netgate Discussion Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login

Interface and VLAN config for TP-LINK TL-WA801ND

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Wireless
5 Posts 3 Posters 2.0k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L
    lewis32
    last edited by Aug 24, 2019, 9:09 AM

    I plan on connecting an access point (TP-LINK TL-WA801ND) to pfSense and setting up two SSIDs tagged with VLANs to create a trusted network and a guest network.

    igb0 - WAN (DHCP)
    igb1 - LAN (192.168.1.0/24)

    igb2
    VLAN 20 (192.168.20.0/24) - assigned as interface PrimaryWiFi
    VLAN 30 (192.168.30.0/24) - assigned as interface GuestWiFi

    When the access point operates in multi SSID mode it expects a VLAN tag for each SSID created. With a UNIFI system you can assign the device as an interface and it will be untagged. Then you can create a VLAN interface with a tag.

    The TP-LINK TL-WA801ND in multi SSID mode assigns VLANs to everything, there is no default untagged stream.

    I'm trying to figure how exactly what static IP address I should give the access point and what network format to use.

    Do I need to add another interface for the access point itself even if it will not be used in rules?

    For example:

    igb2
    WLAN1 (192.168.10.0/24) with a static IP of 192.168.10.1
    VLAN 20 (192.168.20.0/24) - assigned as interface PrimaryWiFi
    VLAN 30 (192.168.30.0/24) - assigned as interface GuestWiFi

    Or is there a way to achieve my goals without adding the WLAN1 interface which will never be used in rules?

    J 1 Reply Last reply Aug 24, 2019, 11:04 AM Reply Quote 0
    • J
      JKnott @lewis32
      last edited by Aug 24, 2019, 11:04 AM

      @lewis32

      My advice is to stay away from TP-Link, if you're planning on using VLANs. I have a different TP-Link access point and can't use a 2nd SSID & VLAN, as they seem to think multicasts should pass between the VLAN and main LAN.

      PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
      i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
      UniFi AC-Lite access point

      I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        stephenw10 Netgate Administrator
        last edited by Aug 24, 2019, 3:36 PM

        Impossible to say without actually testing it. If it allows management over a VLAN though I would do that anyway. Better to avoid tagged and untagged traffic on the same physical interface because of unexpected leaks. I have a TP-Link switch that does that. 😉 However I also have TP-Link switch from their 'enterprise' style range and I've had no problems with it at all.

        That AP does not look 'enterprise'.

        Just to give you options you can probably put OpenWRT on it and then set it up however you want. It's more complex and carries some inherent risk.
        https://openwrt.org/toh/tp-link/tl-wa801nd

        Steve

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          JKnott
          last edited by Aug 24, 2019, 3:45 PM

          @stephenw10 said in Interface and VLAN config for TP-LINK TL-WA801ND:

          Better to avoid tagged and untagged traffic on the same physical interface because of unexpected leaks. I have a TP-Link switch that does that.

          With TP-Link, leaks are expected. 😉

          Also, tagged and untagged on an interface are common in the real world. Take a look at all the VoIP phones, with a computer connected through them.

          With my TP-Link access point, it is possible to have untagged and tagged traffic for the appropriate SSID.

          PfSense running on Qotom mini PC
          i5 CPU, 4 GB memory, 32 GB SSD & 4 Intel Gb Ethernet ports.
          UniFi AC-Lite access point

          I haven't lost my mind. It's around here...somewhere...

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • L
            lewis32
            last edited by Aug 24, 2019, 5:42 PM

            OpenWRT looks like a decent workaround if the factory firmware is not sufficient. Thank you both for the updates on this.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            5 out of 5
            • First post
              5/5
              Last post
            Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.
              This community forum collects and processes your personal information.
              consent.not_received