Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    PF States limit reached.

    Firewalling
    6
    18
    3.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • X
      xciter327
      last edited by xciter327

      Also the firewall had a kernel panic on reboot.(decide to reboot it because the graphs were not working).

      0_1537343874714_df984a18-4f5d-424f-a287-2d0fdd66e793-image.png

      I checked in /var/crashes and there was no dump.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • H
        heper
        last edited by

        So this problem happens every 200 days or so? Uptime in screenshot.....

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • X
          xciter327
          last edited by

          No it happens once a day for the last 3 days. I don't reboot the firewall, I just flush the states. "pfctl -F states all"

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • X
            xciter327
            last edited by

            Just wanted to report it has not happened since I put the limits on.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • B
              beatvjiking
              last edited by

              You can probably find in your logs what device(s) are attempting to open so many sessions and address whatever is happening - i.e. malware or what have you.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • X
                xciter327
                last edited by

                Just to report it happened again. In my eyes, there are two options: Option 1 is adaptive timeouts are not working. Option 2 is the device somehow running out of memory. I can see in the monitoring graph that when the states reach roughly 900k the device becomes un-resposive. I've set much lower adaptive timeouts now and put the max states to 5mil(8G RAM). max src states is at 8096 on each firewall rule.

                If anybody has a suggestion on how to simulate a lot of connection states from multiple IP, I would love to hear it.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  SteveITS Galactic Empire
                  last edited by

                  You're not alone: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&channel=cus&q=pfsense+pf+states+limit+reached

                  this one mentions a Spiceworks scan of a large subnet:
                  https://forum.netgate.com/topic/81059/zone-pf-states-pf-states-limit-reached-how-to-find-the-offender/10
                  Given that post (simultaneous scan), how often are the adaptive timeouts processed/changed/updated by pfSense? (instantly, every 5 minutes, etc.)

                  Pre-2.7.2/23.09: Only install packages for your version, or risk breaking it. Select your branch in System/Update/Update Settings.
                  When upgrading, allow 10-15 minutes to restart, or more depending on packages and device speed.
                  Upvote 👍 helpful posts!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • B
                    beatvjiking
                    last edited by

                    When I recommended 8k states, that was a very high ceiling. It works well in my environment but in most environments that can be far far lower with no negative impacts on user experience. 512 is a reasonable limit to impose on your allow rules. You may want to try that as an alternative to more RAM :)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DerelictD
                      Derelict LAYER 8 Netgate
                      last edited by

                      Is this running on Hyper-V?

                      Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
                      A comprehensive network diagram is worth 10,000 words and 15 conference calls.
                      DO NOT set a source address/port in a port forward or firewall rule unless you KNOW you need it!
                      Do Not Chat For Help! NO_WAN_EGRESS(TM)

                      X 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • X
                        xciter327 @Derelict
                        last edited by

                        @Derelict said in PF States limit reached.:

                        Is this running on Hyper-V?

                        Appreciate your reply. It is on a physical box. Supemicro Atom C2750.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.