Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    OSPF Route Summarization on ABR

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved FRR
    6 Posts 3 Posters 508 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • 0daymaster0
      0daymaster
      last edited by

      Hi. I'm trying to summarize routes between two different OSPF areas. This should be fairly simple, right? Here is my config page for area 0.0.0.0 on my ABR. In area 0.0.0.10 I have a bunch of /24 subnets in the 172.16.0.0/16 and 10.6.0.0/16 prefixes. I want to advertise only 172.16.0.0/16 and 10.6.0.0/16 to my interior gateways in area 0.0.0.0. My current configuration seems to have no effect on route summarization (see screenshot of MikroTik router). What am I doing wrong here? Thanks.

      b4b97f3d-ae32-4ff6-8eaa-4857a3124fa8-image.png

      d4843b17-722a-4371-991b-e71545eabc7b-image.png

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P
        pete35
        last edited by

        Same here, it looks like, it isnt implemented yet in FRR, see : https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/5290

        <a href="https://carsonlam.ca">bintang88</a>
        <a href="https://carsonlam.ca">slot88</a>

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jimpJ
          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
          last edited by

          This worked the last time I tried it, but I don't have it enabled right now to check and none of the backups from my lab have it setup, just fragments.

          Leave the substitute prefix blank. Putting the same value there is not valid and may be why it's not working (FRR may be rejecting the line)

          Last time I did it, I believe what I did was:

          • Set the summaries on the local area (0.0.0.10 in your case)
          • Set this area as a stub
          • Set this area on the LAN interface(s)
          • Set the area to the backbone (0.0.0.0) on the interface facing the rest of the OSPF routers

          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

          Do not Chat/PM for help!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            pete35
            last edited by

            Do we really need a stub area for summarization?
            According to that: https://study-ccna.com/ospf-summarization/
            it isnt required.

            <a href="https://carsonlam.ca">bintang88</a>
            <a href="https://carsonlam.ca">slot88</a>

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jimpJ
              jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
              last edited by

              No, that's just how I had mine setup in the lab when I know it was working. YMMV.

              Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

              Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

              Do not Chat/PM for help!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P
                pete35
                last edited by

                I tried it again, but no success. OVPN routes and static routes are classified as external routes (AS External Link States) into the OSPF database,
                so according to this: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/5290 they are not summarized. Only local LAN addresses have a chance to get summarized.

                <a href="https://carsonlam.ca">bintang88</a>
                <a href="https://carsonlam.ca">slot88</a>

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • First post
                  Last post
                Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.