Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    DNS resolves but there is a delay in ping response

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Virtualization
    8 Posts 2 Posters 782 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P
      pacmac
      last edited by

      Hello,

      I have a ESXi machine. I have pfSense in an VM, Debian with PiHole in another VM connected to the pfSense LAN interface.

      if I do a ping www.google.com, it resolves instantly, but there is a delay to the first ping response.
      if I do a ping from pfSense, it resolves and start receiving responses instantly.

      pfSense is using that Debian/PiHole VM for DNS requests.

      any idea?

      BR.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P
        pacmac
        last edited by

        I have a big delay also accessing to outlook.office.com

        While looking to the browser logs I see that there are a lot of net::ERR_CONNECTION_RESET 200 errors.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • johnpozJ
          johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
          last edited by johnpoz

          And why would you think pfsense has anything to do with that? Are you running proxy on pfsense?

          An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
          If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
          Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
          SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

          P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P
            pacmac @johnpoz
            last edited by

            Because when I back to my router as gateway, then connection is perfect.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
              last edited by

              Are you running proxy on pfsense?

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

              P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P
                pacmac @johnpoz
                last edited by pacmac

                @johnpoz no.

                I have created (on ESXi):

                • one vswitch for WAN
                  pfsense address 192.168.0.2
                  gateway address 192.168.0.1 (my livebox)
                • one vswitch for LAN
                  pfsense as gateway on 10.0.0.1
                  pihole on 10.0.0.3

                I have a desktop on the livebox subnet: 192.168.0.0/24 with this configuration
                IP address 192.168.0.103
                Gateway 192.168.0.2 (pfSense)
                DNS 8.8.8.8

                and I still have the same problem, delays between name resolution and response on pings and big delay on most web accesses.

                let me know if you want screenshots from anything.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • johnpozJ
                  johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator
                  last edited by

                  None of that has anything to do with what I asked.. Are you running proxy on pfsense?

                  Resolving and RTT of pings have zero to do with each other.

                  An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
                  If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
                  Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
                  SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

                  P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P
                    pacmac @johnpoz
                    last edited by

                    @johnpoz

                    I answered 'no' to that on my previous comment in the first line.

                    I don't have too much idea about networking, sorry. I am just giving you as much information as I can.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.