Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    12.1?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved 2.5 Development Snapshots (Retired)
    21 Posts 7 Posters 2.1k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • NollipfSenseN
      NollipfSense @A Former User
      last edited by

      @rschell said in 12.1?:

      Unless there is something fundamentally not functioning in the pfSense v2.5-dev, there would not be much to gain.

      Thank you for the links...I came to the same conclusion as well...thank you for sharing!

      pfSense+ 23.09 Lenovo Thinkcentre M93P SFF Quadcore i7 dual Raid-ZFS 128GB-SSD 32GB-RAM PCI-Intel i350-t4 NIC, -Intel QAT 8950.
      pfSense+ 23.09 VM-Proxmox, Dell Precision Xeon-W2155 Nvme 500GB-ZFS 128GB-RAM PCIe-Intel i350-t4, Intel QAT-8950, P-cloud.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        A Former User @A Former User
        last edited by

        @rschell said in 12.1?:

        @jimp Last week, I moved my builds from 12.1 to 12-Stable and that went reasonably smooth. I'm current with the 2.5 changes (up to 1/14) and haven't noticed any issues. I'll continue to track the updates and let you know if something breaks.

        I'm not sure where to report these findings, so if there is a better place, move it there. Hopefully this is adding value, if not I can be silent. Since moving to the Stable/12 base, I have found to issues that will require further investigation, my tack has been to revert those commits:

        • MFC r339557 (5d9e751) on 1/16/2020 conflicts with Loos-br's a cherry-picked commit on the 2.5 branch (8b64875 on 2/15/2019). MFC r339557 pulls in a reference to uid which was placed into an if block in if_pflog.h by Loos-br. Since change just involved improving a logging message in Stable/12, I choose to revert the MFC 339557 commit.

        • The second commit I have had to revert is MFC r 355881 by hselasky on 12/25/2019, this commit makes a minor location change of a subroutine call in in6_mcast that causes radvd to again start to failing its IPV6_JOIN_GROUP call. I have tried debug this further without success so far.

        Another observation, my VM installs work just fine, but my baremetal installs crash on the first boot:

        --- trap 0xc, rip = 0xffffffff81063b46, rsp = 0xfffffe00248eda30, rbp = 0xfffffe00248eda50 ---
        pfsync_state_export() at pfsync_state_export+0x26/frame 0xfffffe00248eda50
        pfsync_sendout() at pfsync_sendout+0x280/frame 0xfffffe00248edb00
        pfsyncintr() at pfsyncintr+0xd1/frame 0xfffffe00248edb50
        ithread_loop() at ithread_loop+0x1db/frame 0xfffffe00248edbb0
        

        The second boot works just find, the baremetal instance has a Openvpn server running. I don't have a HA configuration setup intentionally, not sure what's triggering the crash yet. Prefer not to rebuild it from scratch if I can avoid it.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T
          techpro2004
          last edited by

          It has been a few months and my original question still stands, When is pfsense 2.5 moving to 12-stable. Thanks?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jimpJ
            jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
            last edited by

            Soon

            Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

            Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

            Do not Chat/PM for help!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T
              techpro2004
              last edited by

              Not helpful using a non-answer for everything time related.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jimpJ
                jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                last edited by

                It's the most useful reply you'll get for asking the same question repeatedly. When there is news, it will be announced. We're quite busy working on things trying to get 2.4.5 out, we also just released TNSR 20.02.

                Be patient. Stop asking the same question so often.

                Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                Do not Chat/PM for help!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T
                  techpro2004
                  last edited by

                  I ask the same question because I never get an answer. When I don't get an answer, I loose hope. When I loose hope, I have to check back to try to get some hope. It is a cycle and only you can break it by giving me valid answers.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • jimpJ
                    jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                    last edited by

                    You have received an answer. The most valid answer you'll get.

                    Nobody is going to give you any kind of timeline because there is none. It will be ready when it's ready. We do not rush things like that.

                    Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                    Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                    Do not Chat/PM for help!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • T
                      techpro2004
                      last edited by

                      So you are telling me you have no internal time goals to get projects done by. If so, how do you get your employees to do anything before it is obsolete also, you said you are pushing on 2.4.5. If you are pushing on it, then you must have an idea of when you want that released.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • jimpJ
                        jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                        last edited by

                        I'm sure we'd all love for it to be out already, but it's not ready, so "soon".

                        This conversation has vastly outlived its usefulness. We have better things to be doing (like working on pfSense)

                        Please refrain from wasting everyone's time with irrelevant and repetitive questions in the future.

                        Remember: Upvote with the ๐Ÿ‘ button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                        Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                        Do not Chat/PM for help!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.