Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname on multi-WAN and "Reset all states if WAN IP Address changes"

    2.5 Development Snapshots (Retired)
    5
    34
    1.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • w0wW
      w0w
      last edited by

      Sad to say but I have same error on the same config. Regardless of option "Reset all states if WAN IP Address changes" enabled or not after known sequence I get those pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname and then Fatal trap 12 a bit later.

      trap12_lily2.jpg

      ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        A Former User @w0w
        last edited by A Former User

        @w0w did you try again after rebooting? I seen a page fault occur on my bare metal instance but not VM, but much earlier in the boot process. Second boot it doesn't occur.

        Not likely to fix the original error however.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • w0wW
          w0w
          last edited by

          It was rebooted multiple times before I did test sequence to crash it ☺, so it is some bug. I'll wait for Netgate version, when it is out or if somebody else find something. It can be also related to ix driver, not sure, will test it also a bit later

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • w0wW
            w0w
            last edited by w0w

            On the igb0 I have similar situation, but different message on 2.5.0-DEVELOPMENT (amd64)
            built on Fri Mar 13. Instead of pf_test spam I have this one...

            kernel: igb0: TX(3) desc avail = 1024, pidx = 0

            Looks like it's this one
            https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239240

            rschell do you have the patch mentioned in the thread included in your firewall version?

            ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              A Former User @w0w
              last edited by A Former User

              @w0w The patches mentioned in 239240 (MFC 356310) and have been incorporated. If its posted in 12-stable branch of pfsense/FreeBSD-src, as of the build date, its in there .

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • I
                Impatient
                last edited by

                I had that fatal trap 12: page fault message happen on a test machine with 2.5.

                I tested mb,drive,memory,switched cpu everything tested good.

                I finally swapped memory even though the previous mem passed memtest for 24 hrs
                and the machine has been running fine since.

                w0wW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • w0wW
                  w0w @Impatient
                  last edited by w0w

                  @Impatient
                  I do not think it's memory, could be Intel card driver, I don't have any problem until I do known sequences on known configuration. Also 2.4.5 is not affected by this bug on the same hardware.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • I
                    Impatient
                    last edited by Impatient

                    If it was the network card would it not mention that in the error?

                    It does mention what is not in memory (supervisor read data)

                    Then the result of that is the (panic: page fault).

                    I run dual wan PPPoE with Reset all states if WAN IP Address changes enabled
                    and get no error's running 2.5.0.a.20200313.1633 as of today on above system.
                    Previously in 2.5.0.a.20200312.something.

                    It has only been running for about 12 hrs. with 1 reboot.

                    w0wW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • w0wW
                      w0w @Impatient
                      last edited by w0w

                      @Impatient
                      My firewall is overall stable on 2.5.0, I can run it for a month until something triggers the fatal trap or "pf_test: kif == NULL", sometimes it crash on boot and 1 of 3 times crashing or/and this "pf_test: kif == NULL" message spamming, when there is the problem on the PPPoE ethernet port — for example ISP router is out of power or I have unplugged the cable or changed the link speed.
                      I repeat, I do not have any of the mentioned problems on 2.4.5 version, so I think it's software problem.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B
                        BlakeThoennes
                        last edited by BlakeThoennes

                        Hello all,

                        As was announced 2.5 to be soon mainstreamed, I jumped onto the dev branch.

                        15 minutes after successful upgrade net went down, I couldnt ping or load pfsense web.
                        Error streaming on screen without stop was

                        igb1: TX(2) desc avail = 1024, pidx = 0

                        Running 2.5.0.a.20200330.1049 (latest x64)
                        Potential Solution based on power settings posted here? Not sure how to issue these commands. (from terminal at firewall, thru web, ssh...???)
                        https://forum.netgate.com/topic/149643/igbx-bug-tx-1-desc-avail-no-carrier

                        Bug report mentioned elsewhere here:
                        https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239240

                        Had been running stable until now and never had a single issue.
                        Only way to get the firewall working (tried ifconfig up down, bridge up down, reset web config, etc) was to reboot the firewall. Has been working for over 50 minutes now without issue...

                        Heres the logs at time of event.
                        Mar 30 15:15:15 kernel igb1: TX(2) desc avail = 1024, pidx = 0
                        Mar 30 15:15:15 check_reload_status 356 Reloading filter
                        Mar 30 15:15:15 php-fpm 343 /rc.linkup: Hotplug event detected for LAN(lan) static IP (192.168.1.1 )
                        Mar 30 15:15:14 kernel igb1: link state changed to DOWN
                        Mar 30 15:15:14 check_reload_status 356 Linkup starting $igb1
                        Mar 30 15:15:14 kernel igb1: TX(1) desc avail = 42, pidx = 712

                        Additional Log Hardware Information for comparison to yours if you suffer from this too...
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel wlan: mac acl policy registered
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel random: entropy device external interface
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1600051300 Hz quality 1000
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel Launching APs: 3 2 1
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel ioapic0 <Version 2.0> irqs 0-114 on motherboard
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel random: unblocking device.
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 4 core(s)
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel WARNING: L1 data cache covers fewer APIC IDs than a core (0 < 1)
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel ACPI APIC Table: <ALASKA A M I >
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel Event timer "LAPIC" quality 600
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel avail memory = 8161169408 (7783 MB)
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel real memory = 8589934592 (8192 MB)
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel TSC: P-state invariant, performance statistics
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel VT-x: PAT,HLT,MTF,PAUSE,EPT,UG,VPID
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel Structured Extended Features3=0xc000400<IBPB,STIBP>
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel Structured Extended Features=0x2282<TSCADJ,SMEP,ERMS,NFPUSG>
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel AMD Features2=0x101<LAHF,Prefetch>
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel AMD Features=0x28100800<SYSCALL,NX,RDTSCP,LM>
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel Features2=0x43d8e3bf<SSE3,PCLMULQDQ,DTES64,MON,DS_CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,MOVBE,POPCNT,TSCDLT,AESNI,RDRAND>
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel Features=0xbfebfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE>
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel Origin="GenuineIntel" Id=0x406c4 Family=0x6 Model=0x4c Stepping=4
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J3160 @ 1.60GHz (1600.05-MHz K8-class CPU)
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel VT(efifb): resolution 800x600
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel FreeBSD clang version 6.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_601/final 335540) (based on LLVM 6.0.1)
                        Mar 30 15:21:04 kernel FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE-p10 ce9563d5729(RELENG_2_5) pfSense amd64

                        Suggestions? Recommend I go back to stable?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • w0wW
                          w0w
                          last edited by

                          I am waiting for 2.5.0 based on STABLE. Expected to be soon. I hope that it will be released before the end of the world. ☺

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • B
                            BlakeThoennes
                            last edited by

                            Good news is it hasnt failed on me again since the one time 15m after original upgrade.

                            So... scary start, but stable for nearly 24hours now.

                            Hopefully that release is SOON.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • w0wW
                              w0w
                              last edited by

                              Re-tested on the latest build
                              2.5.0-DEVELOPMENT (amd64)
                              built on Fri Apr 03 19:36:42 EDT 2020
                              FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE-p10
                              Don't know what exactly was merged/patched, whatever else, but I can not crash my system anymore with my test sequence. I'll check later what changes are made on github.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • w0wW
                                w0w
                                last edited by

                                Hmm... looks like this thing came back, after I've configured CARP and started to play with PPPoE on secondary firewall and re-plugged main ethernet cable that cames from ISP (PPPoE).

                                Crash report begins.  Anonymous machine information:

amd64
12.1-STABLE
FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE f1de4082be8(devel-12) pfSense

Crash report details:

No PHP errors found.

..........................................
<118>Starting CRON... done.
<118> Starting package Cron...done.
<118> Starting package System Patches...done.
<118> Starting package Service Watchdog...done.
<118> Starting package nut...done.
<118> Starting package Shellcmd...done.
<118> Starting package Backup...done.
<118> Starting package iperf...done.
<118> Starting /usr/local/etc/rc.d/shutdown.nut.sh...done.
<118>pfSense 2.5.0-DEVELOPMENT amd64 Fri May 22 07:43:46 EDT 2020
<118>Bootup complete
<6>ix0: link state changed to DOWN
<6>ix0: link state changed to UP
<6>ix0: link state changed to DOWN
<6>ix0: link state changed to UP
<6>gif0: link state changed to DOWN
<6>ng0: changing name to 'pppoe0'
<6>gif0: link state changed to DOWN
<6>gif0: link state changed to UP
<6>gif0: link state changed to DOWN
<6>gif0: link state changed to UP
<6>gif0: link state changed to DOWN
pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname 
pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname @��
pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname @��
pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname @��
pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname @��
pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname @��
pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname @��
pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname @��
pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname @��
pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname @��
pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname @��
pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname @��
pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname @��
pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname @��
pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname @��
pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname @��
pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname @��
pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname @��
<6>ng0: changing name to 'pppoe0'
pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname @��
pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname 
<6>gif0: link state changed to DOWN
<6>gif0: link state changed to UP


Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 2; apic id = 04
fault virtual address	= 0x70
fault code		= supervisor read data, page not present
instruction pointer	= 0x20:0xffffffff80f25037
stack pointer	        = 0x28:0xfffffe0095dd2370
frame pointer	        = 0x28:0xfffffe0095dd23b0
code segment		= base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
			= DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1
processor eflags	= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
current process		= 80273 (unbound)
trap number		= 12
panic: page fault
cpuid = 2
time = 1590480096
KDB: enter: panic

                                The crash occurs only on primary firewall.
                                Full log is here

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • w0wW
                                  w0w
                                  last edited by w0w

                                  Got those topic messages on backup firewall also, when experimented with PPPoE (same link)

                                  May 26 19:34:51 	kernel 		
May 26 19:34:51 	root 	54561 	PPPoE put down
May 26 19:34:51 	kernel 		
May 26 19:34:50 	kernel 		
May 26 19:34:50 	kernel 		
May 26 19:34:49 	kernel 		
May 26 19:34:49 	kernel 		
May 26 19:34:48 	kernel 		
May 26 19:34:48 	kernel 		
May 26 19:34:47 	kernel 		
May 26 19:34:47 	kernel 		
May 26 19:34:47 	kernel 		
May 26 19:34:46 	kernel 		
May 26 19:34:46 	kernel 		
May 26 19:34:46 	kernel 		
May 26 19:34:45 	kernel 		
May 26 19:34:45 	kernel 		
May 26 19:34:44 	kernel 		pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname
May 26 19:34:44 	kernel 		pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname
May 26 19:34:43 	kernel 		pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname
May 26 19:34:43 	kernel 		pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname
May 26 19:34:42 	kernel 		
May 26 19:34:42 	kernel 		
May 26 19:34:42 	kernel 		pf_test: kif == NULL, if_xname

                                  Crashdump

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • w0wW
                                    w0w
                                    last edited by

                                    May be it's https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230498

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • w0wW
                                      w0w
                                      last edited by w0w

                                      I've played around a bit and the result is that 2.4.5-RELEASE is still not affected, and 2.5 is crashing not every time but mostly, when I issue 'killall mpd5' or even 'rc.linkup stop wan'
                                      The configuration is the same. PPPoE as WAN, DHCP as WAN2, no IPv6, only failover is configured. PPPoE as tier1 and DHCP as tier2.
                                      I don't think that unbound is the real cause of crash... just because I've tried to stop unbound service and repeat the sequence (multiple times disconnected and connected WAN port cable) and got another dump. crash00.txt

                                      Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 3; apic id = 06
fault virtual address	= 0x0
fault code		= supervisor read instruction, page not present
instruction pointer	= 0x20:0x0
stack pointer	        = 0x28:0xfffffe0074d614a8
frame pointer	        = 0x28:0xfffffe0074d615f0
code segment		= base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
			= DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1
processor eflags	= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
current process		= 12 (swi4: clock (0))
trap number		= 12
panic: page fault
cpuid = 3
time = 1590747377
KDB: enter: panic
����������������

                                      https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234296 looks very similar.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • w0wW
                                        w0w
                                        last edited by

                                        Do we have patch provided in https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234296 enabled on pfSense latest 2.5 version? I mean https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=343787

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • jimpJ
                                          jimp Rebel Alliance Developer Netgate
                                          last edited by

                                          If it was marked fixed in 12.0-RELEASE then yes, that would be in 2.5.0. 2.5.0 snapshots are on 12.1-STABLE now, so well past that point.

                                          Remember: Upvote with the 👍 button for any user/post you find to be helpful, informative, or deserving of recognition!

                                          Need help fast? Netgate Global Support!

                                          Do not Chat/PM for help!

                                          w0wW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • w0wW
                                            w0w @jimp
                                            last edited by w0w

                                            @jimp
                                            Can you suggest me something?

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post