Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    Problem after pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16 update

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved pfBlockerNG
    20 Posts 3 Posters 1.9k Views 5 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • chudakC Offline
      chudak @RonpfS
      last edited by chudak

      @ronpfs

      I don’t see what to review there :(
      All countries except USA selected and I did not touch it for long time

      3A0FA458-3592-4221-8E39-06C205A89852.jpeg

      And then why T-Mobile net blocked ?

      PR_v4
      172.58.88.0/21

      That seems like main suspect, no ?

      RonpfSR 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • RonpfSR Offline
        RonpfS @chudak
        last edited by RonpfS

        @chudak You have 80 IPv4 items selected, click on the "..."

        2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
        Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
        Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

        chudakC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • chudakC Offline
          chudak @RonpfS
          last edited by

          @ronpfs

          I did and as I said all but USA selected

          E3A612C8-22E2-40CE-B6A5-768CCFA3CCB7.jpeg

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • RonpfSR Offline
            RonpfS @chudak
            last edited by RonpfS

            @chudak said in Problem after pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16 update:

            And then why T-Mobile net blocked ?

            GeoIP isn't perfect, and only update once a month.

            Put that IP or range in a Permit group, or change strategy from Blocking the world to Allowing some countries ;-)

            2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
            Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
            Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

            chudakC 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • chudakC Offline
              chudak @RonpfS
              last edited by chudak

              @ronpfs

              In addition adding to the whitelist does not seem to be working

              clicked on + in the psBNG report and added the IP
              force reload
              the IP is shown as added
              verified it's listed in "IPv4 Custom_List"
              verified pfB_Whitelist_v4 rule is on top of the FW rules

              ping still blocked by pfB_NAmerica_v4 auto rule (1770009871)

              ?!

              (Tried disabled North America in GeoIP, after force reload - traffic pass)

              RonpfSR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • chudakC Offline
                chudak @RonpfS
                last edited by

                @ronpfs

                How do you "change strategy from Blocking the world to Allowing some countries" ?

                Thx

                GerardoMdPG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • GerardoMdPG Offline
                  GerardoMdP @chudak
                  last edited by

                  @chudak Maybe... "Allowing the world to blocking some countries". Its more dificult to block all and let a few be allowed than allow (almost) everything and block specific traffic imo.

                  chudakC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • chudakC Offline
                    chudak @GerardoMdP
                    last edited by

                    @gerardomdp said in Problem after pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16 update:

                    @chudak Maybe... "Allowing the world to blocking some countries". Its more dificult to block all and let a few be allowed than allow (almost) everything and block specific traffic imo.

                    I agree, it was a bit confused by this :)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • RonpfSR Offline
                      RonpfS @chudak
                      last edited by

                      @chudak said in Problem after pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16 update:

                      verified pfB_Whitelist_v4 rule is on top of the FW rules

                      What does your FW Rules look like ? Did you click the "Quick" box?
                      You can use the Report tab "+" to create a Whitelist group and see how it's configured.

                      2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                      Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
                      Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

                      chudakC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • chudakC Offline
                        chudak @RonpfS
                        last edited by

                        @ronpfs said in Problem after pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16 update:

                        @chudak said in Problem after pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16 update:

                        verified pfB_Whitelist_v4 rule is on top of the FW rules

                        What does your FW Rules look like ? Did you click the "Quick" box?
                        You can use the Report tab "+" to create a Whitelist group and see how it's configured.

                        The rule looks like:

                        fa6c656c-75bf-4945-9096-f71bc68d2363-image.png

                        Little confused by White_List_ports, but I never modified it manually

                        3f375a77-4472-487a-86ef-0b8550c8fa11-image.png

                        Port 80, don't know why.

                        Quick "Apply the action immediately on match." checked

                        Anything wrong ?

                        chudakC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • chudakC Offline
                          chudak @chudak
                          last edited by chudak

                          Something is really fishy.

                          Either my North America setup all of the sudden got messed or pbBNG messed the GeoIP list or the MaxMind GeoIP list is bad.

                          I did some testing pinging my router from different locations using NordVPN:

                          SF CA 172.58.94.230 blocked by pfB_NAmerica_v4 (PR_v4 172.58.88.0/21) (no VPN)
                          
                          SF CA 192.145.118.74 blocked by pfB_NAmerica_v4 (DE_rep_v4 192.145.116.0/22)
                          
                          NY NY 185.187.243.230 blocked by pfB_Top_v4 (DE_rep_v4 185.187.243.0/24)
                          
                          Dallas 107.158.15.75 passed 
                          
                          Atlanta 92.119.17.244 blocked by pfB_Top_v4 (GB_rep_v4 92.119.16.0/22)
                          

                          Why CA is PR, DE, NY -- DE, Atlanta -- GB ???
                          Kill me I don't know.

                          To make it even more spicy - I asked a couple of fiends to ping me from different phones, located not in SF, and they were successful from AT&T and T-Mobile (!!!)

                          Anybody has a hypothesis ?

                          @BBcan177

                          RonpfSR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • RonpfSR Offline
                            RonpfS @chudak
                            last edited by RonpfS

                            @chudak Your FW Rules is only for TCP/IP, you need FW Rules to allow ICMP if you wanna use Ping.

                            You can search de GeoIP .txt files for the Networks that puzzle you.

                            There are probably good guides or posts on how to configure your pfSense to achieve your goals.

                            2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                            Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
                            Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

                            chudakC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • chudakC Offline
                              chudak @RonpfS
                              last edited by

                              @ronpfs said in Problem after pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16 update:

                              @chudak Your FW Rules is only for TCP/IP, you need FW Rules to allow ICMP if you wanna use Ping.

                              Of cause, I have FW rule to allow ICMP, otherwise I won't be able to ping at all !

                              You can search de GeoIP .txt files for the Networks that puzzle you.

                              There are probably good guides or posts on how to configure your pfSense to achieve your goals.

                              You seem to be suggesting a mis-configuration, which is possible. But I've provided a detailed tests and settings, that can be repeated and/or confirmed and/or proofed wrong.

                              What exactly do you suspect wrong with the settings based on what's shown ?

                              One note - the same pfBNG configuration has been in use with no issues for long time.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • chudakC Offline
                                chudak @chudak
                                last edited by

                                @chudak said in Problem after pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16 update:

                                @ronpfs said in Problem after pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16 update:

                                @chudak said in Problem after pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16 update:

                                What does GeoIP PR mean?

                                Porto Rico

                                grep "172.58.88." /usr/local/share/GeoIP/cc/*.txt
                                
                                /usr/local/share/GeoIP/cc/North_America_v4.txt:172.58.88.0/21
                                /usr/local/share/GeoIP/cc/North_America_v4.txt:172.58.88.0/21
                                /usr/local/share/GeoIP/cc/PR_v4.txt:172.58.88.0/21
                                /usr/local/share/GeoIP/cc/US_rep_v4.txt:172.58.88.0/21
                                
                                
                                

                                Why Porto Rico if I am I San Francisco CA ?!

                                I am still straggling with this ....

                                Do you have an explanation why in your grep 172.58.88.0/21 i slisted in 4 GeoIP lists North_America, PR_v4, US_rep?

                                RonpfSR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • RonpfSR Offline
                                  RonpfS @chudak
                                  last edited by

                                  @chudak
                                  From any GeoIP tab : Click here for IMPORTANT info --> What's new in GeoIP2

                                  2.4.5-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)
                                  Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 8GB
                                  Backup 0.5_5, Bandwidthd 0.7.4_4, Cron 0.3.7_5, pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16, Status_Traffic_Totals 2.3.1_1, System_Patches 1.2_5

                                  chudakC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • chudakC Offline
                                    chudak @RonpfS
                                    last edited by

                                    @ronpfs said in Problem after pfBlockerNG-devel 3.0.0_16 update:

                                    @chudak
                                    From any GeoIP tab : Click here for IMPORTANT info --> What's new in GeoIP2

                                    Cool, so far I don't see what's wrong. Do you ?

                                    I had a chat with MaxMind support and one thing jumped at me "it looks like the "registered country" for that IP address range is Germany. I'm wondering if pfSense is looking at that instead of the "country""

                                    That's interesting

                                    It'd be good to have a NordVPN and GeoIP user here to confirm this....

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.