Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    WireGuard lives!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    WireGuard
    17
    90
    24.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • V
      vjizzle
      last edited by

      Hi! I setup pfSense 2.6 on my Hyper-V lab and was able to get setup a Wireguard tunnel with TorGuard. Looks promising! I did notice a little more cpu load then I expected when running speedtests but I was able to utilize my 100Mbit internet connection.

      WGTUN Interface (opt1, tun_wg0)
Status
up 
IPv4 Address
10.13.XX.XX
Subnet mask IPv4
255.255.255.0 
Gateway IPv4
10.13.XX.XX
MTU
1500 
In/out packets
509239/443583 (536.63 MiB/360.12 MiB) 
In/out packets (pass)
509239/443583 (536.63 MiB/360.12 MiB) 
In/out packets (block)
0/0 (0 B/0 B) 
In/out errors
0/0 
Collisions
0

      wg01.png

      cmcdonaldC C 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • cmcdonaldC
        cmcdonald Netgate Developer @vjizzle
        last edited by cmcdonald

        @vjizzle There is still optimization gains to be realized yet in the kernel module...primarily around the crypto. We will track all ongoing development on all fronts to keep this fresh and current. Stay tuned

        Need help fast? https://www.netgate.com/support

        E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • E
          emikaadeo @cmcdonald
          last edited by emikaadeo

          @theonemcdonald Hi! Just to clarify, will this be available in pfSense 2.5.1 Package Manager ?

          JeGrJ C 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JeGrJ
            JeGr LAYER 8 Moderator @emikaadeo
            last edited by

            @emikaadeo said in WireGuard lives!:

            @theonemcdonald Hi! Just to clarify, will this be available in pfSense 2.5.1 Package Manager ?

            Not currently as it's not recommended for stable. So if you want to run it on 2.5.x, download the packages from GitHub and install it manually.

            Don't forget to upvote 👍 those who kindly offered their time and brainpower to help you!

            If you're interested, I'm available to discuss details of German-speaking paid support (for companies) if needed.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • C
              chrisjmuk @emikaadeo
              last edited by

              @emikaadeo I am currently just using the Dev build 1.6.xxxx and just install the package via the package manager and seems to work great.

              V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C
                chrisjmuk @vjizzle
                last edited by

                @vjizzle i am using the same and this is my CPU spec and i am only using 3% on idle but does jump to 40% on a speed which it would normally even without the wireguard.

                Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N2940 @ 1.83GHz
                Current: 1826 MHz, Max: 1827 MHz
                4 CPUs: 1 package(s) x 4 core(s)

                V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • V
                  vajonam Rebel Alliance @chrisjmuk
                  last edited by

                  @chrisjmuk think you mean 2.6.xx ?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • V
                    vjizzle @chrisjmuk
                    last edited by vjizzle

                    @chrisjmuk I have the following specs on my testlab pfSense 2.6:

                    CPU Type Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-6100U CPU @ 2.30GHz
                    2 CPUs: 1 package(s) x 1 core(s) x 2 hardware threads
                    AES-NI CPU Crypto: Yes (inactive)
                    QAT Crypto: No

                    The load does not bother me that much, my main pfSense is a core i5 beast :) so no worries there. But by the time this is ready for production I expect it to be better optimized for performance. The developer said there will be tweaks and tuning.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • E
                      emikaadeo
                      last edited by emikaadeo

                      Downloaded packages from GitHub and installed manually v0.0.9 on 2.5.1-RELEASE (amd64) in this order:

                      wireguard-kmod-0.0.20210503.txz
wireguard-tools-lite-1.0.20210424.txz
pfSense-pkg-WireGuard-0.0.9.txz

                      Works great so far (using Mullvad VPN)
                      Is there any best/safe method to upgrade packages when new versions will be available?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        dersch
                        last edited by

                        So if i update to 2.5.1 i need to manually install the package?

                        E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • E
                          emikaadeo @dersch
                          last edited by

                          @dersch
                          The new WireGuard port is currently not available officially in 2.5.1 Package Manager (only in 2.6.0 development) so yes, you have to install packages manually.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • martywdM
                            martywd
                            last edited by

                            I'm running 2.5.1 with the pfsense wireguard v0.0.9 pkgs installed. I configured wireguard 3+ days ago to connect my VPN (Windscribe) and since then all is working flawlessly. Nice.

                            Now I see that the v0.1.1 pkgs were released a few hours ago, so like @emikaadeo asked previously, what is/are the "best/safe method to upgrade packages when new versions will be available?"

                            Thanks!
                            .

                            D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • D
                              dersch @martywd
                              last edited by

                              @martywd same for me.

                              @theonemcdonald can you advise please how to upgrade?

                              with

                              pgk upgrade pfSense-pkg-WireGuard-new.version.txz

                              it is asking to install it new. So do we need to remove the old.version first? will the config persist?

                              V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • V
                                vajonam Rebel Alliance @dersch
                                last edited by

                                @dersch

                                Yes as long as the "keep settings" is checked on the settings tab. It will persist. but its always good to make a backup of your config before you upgrade. Recreating the wg tunnels is quite easy once you have the settings.

                                However I have done the upgrade on many boxes and it runs it fine. Just be careful if you are upgrading wireguard over the wire guard tunnel itself like a remote router.

                                T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • T
                                  tquade @vajonam
                                  last edited by

                                  @vajonam

                                  Having no success upgrading to 0.1.1 from 0.0.9 on pfSense 2.6.0-DEVELOPMENT.

                                  Have tried the following with result:

                                  [2.6.0-DEVELOPMENT][admin@pfSense.localdomain]/root: pkg upgrade pfSense-pkg-WireGuard-0.1.1_1.txz
                                  Updating pfSense-core repository catalogue...
                                  pfSense-core repository is up to date.
                                  Updating pfSense repository catalogue...
                                  pfSense repository is up to date.
                                  All repositories are up to date.
                                  pkg: pfSense-pkg-WireGuard-0.1.1_1.txz is not installed, therefore upgrade is impossible
                                  Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting)
                                  Your packages are up to date.

                                  [2.6.0-DEVELOPMENT][admin@pfSense.localdomain]/root: pkg install pfSense-pkg-WireGuard-0.1.1_1.txz
                                  Updating pfSense-core repository catalogue...
                                  pfSense-core repository is up to date.
                                  Updating pfSense repository catalogue...
                                  pfSense repository is up to date.
                                  All repositories are up to date.
                                  pkg: No packages available to install matching 'pfSense-pkg-WireGuard-0.1.1_1.txz' have been found in the repositories

                                  [2.6.0-DEVELOPMENT][admin@pfSense.localdomain]/root: pkg add https://github.com/theonemcdonald/pfSense-pkg-WireGuard/releases/download/v0.1.1/pfSense-pkg-WireGuard-0.1.1_1.txz
                                  Fetching pfSense-pkg-WireGuard-0.1.1_1.txz: 100% 26 KiB 26.6kB/s 00:01
                                  Installing pfSense-pkg-WireGuard-0.1.1_1...
                                  the most recent version of pfSense-pkg-WireGuard-0.0.9 is already installed

                                  I'm out of ideas.
                                  Ted Quade

                                  V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • V
                                    vajonam Rebel Alliance @tquade
                                    last edited by

                                    @tquade

                                    pkg remove 0.0.9 and then pkg install 0.1.1_1

                                    I think the issue is that you cannot upgrade a _1 (REVISION) package when you dont have 0.1.1 package installed.

                                    remove should not lose your configuration.

                                    T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • T
                                      tquade @vajonam
                                      last edited by

                                      @vajonam

                                      Thanks for the pointers.

                                      I had to run pkg add ...........-0.1.1_1
                                      instead of pkg install ..........-0.1.1_1

                                      Ted Quade

                                      cmcdonaldC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • V
                                        vajonam Rebel Alliance
                                        last edited by

                                        Just a best practice. when using the command line, always remove and install new versions.

                                        Eventually when we move to a gui installer (Package Manager) it will do this anyway. this way no files are left around because of an upgrade.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                        • cmcdonaldC
                                          cmcdonald Netgate Developer @tquade
                                          last edited by cmcdonald

                                          @tquade if you are side loading you should always pkg remove first and then pkg add. The GUI package manager doesn't perform in place upgrades as that can leave obsolete files on disk.

                                          Edit: @vajonam beat me lool

                                          Need help fast? https://www.netgate.com/support

                                          T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • T
                                            tquade @cmcdonald
                                            last edited by

                                            @theonemcdonald
                                            @vajonam I leave a little wiser. Thanks to both of you.

                                            Ted

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post